Multiple Intelligence Theory and Learning Styles

I passed two different tests and got almost the exact same results. The first test shows me that I have four clearly expressed intelligences: Kinesthetic, Logical, Intrapersonal and Visual/Spatial. The second test gave me three top intelligences: Kinesthetic, Logical and Intrapersonal. I can say that all results correspond to reality. It is true that I love sports. I play tennis around 11 years. Also, I like math because of it I chose accounting discipline. In addition, it is completely true that I am an intrapersonal. Using these results I may think about my future career. However, I already have chosen one and it is correct decision this test proved my thoughts. Also, Kinesthetic intelligence provides me a chance to go in for sport. Logical intelligence supports my decision to be an accountant or an economist. However Intrapersonal intelligence shows me that I may reach successes working as CEO, an entrepreneur or even a psychologist.

While looking over my answers on the “Multiple Intelligence Scoring Sheet”, I’ve noticed that I only have “strong abilities” in the musical category. However, I also have abilities in interpersonal and intrapersonal as well. I honestly do agree on with Howard Gardner’s Theory and his descriptions because each category is written with logical meanings. After reviewing the types of roles that I was put in; the three listed are actually perfect for me, and the others don’t quite correlate with me personally, except spatial-visual.

My highest score was 80 which was for Bodily - Kinesthetic which means that I think of self-expression or the precision to achieve a goal. I actually do agree with the statement because I am a person who always has a goal to be perfect and get to the top. Now I do agree with the statements that the Multiple Intelligence Survey did give me my correct answers. As I said about the Bodily - Kinesthetic was about how to always be correct or perfect, but what it said my lowest skills was naturalistic, musical, and logical. This statement is true. None of these things are skills that have ever come naturally to me. My lowest result in this survey was naturalistic, musical, intrapersonal, and logical. My highest score was 80 which was for Bodily -

As nurses and nursing students, it is practical to have an understanding of the distinctive learning styles to tailor our success in school as well as heath promotion to meet the various learning tactics of our patients. That is to say, health promotion is a fundamental phase of our nursing interventions. The Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (2012) reports“ nurses promote health by advocating for healthy public policy and use their knowledge and expertise to promote health literacy with individual clients, families, groups and communities” (pg.14). Nonetheless, awareness of our learning styles enables us to improve and develop our learning skills. Furthermore, the usefulness of knowing our learning style as student nurses will open

When considering Organization Behavior, the learning styles assessment, and the TED Talk disputing the validity of individual learning styles as a real concept, there are several inherent themes evident throughout this thread. One such theme is that of self-reflection and awareness as means to understanding others better. Additionally, the themes of diversity and human behavior are explored equally. Organizational culture, structure and production are influenced and created by the individual members of any organization. Therefore, knowing your learning styles give ones an opportunity to maximize learning and highlight strengths and weaknesses. “Understanding your own learning styles and the styles of those around you will ensure that you are able to retain information and get the most out of each development opportunity” (Learning styles, 2017).

Extensive study has been done in the field of education regarding both learning styles and multiple intelligences. Several have even investigated the use of a multiple intelligences awareness when conducting psychotherapy. These studies, however, did not focus on a client’s specific intelligence, instead they looked at therapy that involved using many of the intelligences without regard to the individual intelligence profile. In the researcher’s review of existing literature on therapy and multiple intelligences theory, however, no studies were found to have focused on the relationship between specific modes of therapy and individual intelligences. Does the type of therapy found to be effective for an individual have anything to do with that individual’s learning style or higher level of intelligence in one area over another? Specifically, is there a theory that

Howard Gardner is the “John H. and Elisabeth A. Hobbs Professor of Cognition and Education at the Harvard Graduate School of Education and Adjunct Professor of Neurology at the Boston University School of Medicine, and Senior Director of Harvard Project Zero” (Gardner bio, Multiple Intelligences and Education, MI Theory, and Project Zero). As director of Project Zero, it provided and environment that Gardner could begin the exploration of human cognition (Multiple Intelligences and Education). Project Zero colleagues have been designing assessment and the use of multiple intelligences (MI) to realize more personalized curriculum, instruction, and teaching methods; and the quality of crossing traditional boundaries between academic

There are many intelligences described to us through our lives, all over the world. Does in-telligence decide what we do with our lives, or is one intelligence more important than any other? When we look at Merriam-Webster (2013) for the definition of intelligence it states that it is the ability to learn different or new actions dependent on circumstances involved. So, who decides what intelligence is, and do we know if emotional intelligence, personal intelligence or any other intelligence plays a part in the different styles of learning. Let us explore the effects that intelli-gence has on people, and how emotional intelligence plays a more important role than we think.

There are several different learning styles and theories about approaching them. Some students learn better through one or more of the learning styles than another. As Rita Dunn of St. John’s University says, “A students best “modality” for learning may be visual, auditory, or tactile, according to the speakers”(Walton,1991). An auditory learner may learn better through hearing material spoken. A visual learner learns better by reading instructions to himself. And finally, a tactile learner will usually learn most effectively when they are able to use models or things that they can touch or manipulate. Technology supports these three learning styles; auditory, visual and tactile. Animated graphics of

Out of the three assessments of multiple intelligence, preferred learning style and left right brain I believe that multiple intelligences was the most accurate assessment.

My results from Multiple Intelligences tell me that my linguistic is 67%, logical-mathematical is 31%, visual-spatial is 42%, intrapersonal is 44%, interpersonal is 63%, musical is 81%, bodity-kinesthetic is 50% and naturalistic is 33%.

Multiple intelligences will greatly affect one’s academic and professional success. Depending on which area one is strongest in, an ideal work environment would allow for that strength to be used. For example, if an individual were strongest in the logical-mathematical intelligence, he or she would want to work as an IT technician or a financial advisor. It 's the same as if an individual had the most strength in musical intelligence, he or she would want to be a musician or conduct an orchestra. Knowing one’s multiple intelligence could be extremely beneficial to one’s academic and career success. For example, If an

Taking into account the learning needs and diversities of all my students, I have made adjustments to the curriculum content. I included choice homework, individual work, small groups and graphic organizers to allow for students who struggle, students who need a challenge and for English Language Learners. Using strategies that can be as simplified or as complicated as I need them to be, allows me to address every student’s individual needs.

Most likely my classroom is going to consist of very diverse learners and this will definitely affect the dynamics of my classroom. Some of the challenges with a diverse classroom are the fact that there are so many different multiple intelligences, creating activities that appeal to all students is very difficult, and the fact that it may be hard to remember all of the accommodations for each student in the class who has an Individual Education Plan (IEP). There are many opportunities available for having a diverse classroom as well. For instance, it will allow me to have a wider variety of activities to help keep the students (and myself) engaged, the likelihood of having a boring classroom is diminished, and it gives me the opportunity to learn more about my students and to learn about new and different activities available that other teachers have shared. With this being said, there are many different activities I can use to appeal to the range of multiple intelligences and the variety of learning styles. After researching some different activities, I found the following to have the most potential for me as an 8th grade teacher. First of all, I like the idea of using a questionnaire at the beginning of the school year where the students answer questions about themselves to determine their own learning styles, etc. I think it is important for students to know the best ways they learn so they can study in that fashion. Some students may just feel that they are on

The concept of multiple intelligence all together is a favorite of mine. The first quote you mentioned from Howard Gardner is brilliant. In my personal opinion, I think that supporting a wide variety of intelligences is a strong point of mine. However, no one is perfect and we all always tend to lean toward our own intelligence strengths. My strengths from the assessment were: bodily kinesthetic, interpersonal and existential. I have had numerous lessons on Howard Gardner’s multiple intelligences, yet have never officially seen a ninth one. I have heard it mentioned that a ninth intelligence was in planning, but I had never seen it before. It is a wonderful addition, especially since it applies to me. However, I feel that bodily kinesthetic more largely describes me. Since bodily kinesthetic is higher activity wise, it is easier for me to come down to meet the needs of children with different intelligences. This is just a personal opinion, but I believe that having an intelligence strength that is calmer and more put together (logical mathematical or verbal) would be harder to branch out to meet the needs of the more complex and less recognized intelligences (naturalist, musical or spatial). That is just me going out on a limb and pondering the idea though. However, coming down to meet a more logical and concert thinker might be more of a challenge than it seems.