Unfortunately, as an employee of an organization several years ago I was involved in a whistle blowing the case. I can personally vouch for the fact it is unpleasant at best and quit a headache. My “employer” was violating multiple OSHA and PEOSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) codes and requirements for training and personal protection. My colleague and I brought these issues to management in a written form on more than one occasion, and we both were promptly removed from the personnel roster without cause. The next several months were meetings, interviews, letters and legal correspondence to prove our case which was ultimately decided in our favor, reinstating us and led to a hefty fine for the agency. This was a volunteer
This case was based on facts and opinions from Peter Ramirez as being an employee for Yosemite Water Company as a route sales representative/relief sales representative. This case was filed because Mr. Ramirez felt that he wasn’t getting paid properly for all the jobs and duties he performed at the company. Also, the case was to resolve whether a bottled water driver was entitled to overtime pay or whether he was outside salesperson and being exempt from the Industrial Welfare Commission Wage Orders. Mr. Ramirez left the company and then he brought action against Yosemite for unpaid overtime wages. Yosemite defense was that Mr. Ramirez was an outside salesperson and exempt from wage and overtime laws. The best way to avoid costly lawsuits is with careful review of employee classifications (Hsiao-Ying and Kleiner, 2005).
6 A worker being fired for actions ranging from filing a workers’ compensation claim to reporting safety violations to government agencies is called
In this instance, Griffith would not be sheltered from retaliation under the traditional state and federal whistleblower laws. Federal laws generally protect those that disclose fraud against the government and state law NY Code 740 covers private sector and only when the complaint has been brought to the supervisor first. In the complaint against the State of New York et al the District Court ruled that Griffith’s first amendment rights and first amendment retaliation claims would not be summarily dismissed.
Protecting employees against reprisals when they report, in good faith, actions they feel violate the law or these standards.
In 2008, Lowe’s Companies, Inc. have failed to ensure a sustainable safety environment, put in place a health program, and maintain adequate record keeping on work-related injury and illnesses claims for certain locations in the state of Ohio. This employer has been made aware of OSHA requirements for its industry and has been cited many times for similar infractions. OSHA regulators have imposed stiff penalty fines that have cost Lowe’s Companies Inc. thousands of dollars. The record-keeping violations at the
The employee should first refer to their Code of Ethics to determine if the issue is unethical or just not to their liking. An issue could be ethical and reasonable but just not to their liking. If the issue is reasonable, they should decide if it is worth finding another job, discussing the issue internally, or ignoring. If the issue is unethical, the employee should try to handle the situation within the organization first, such as speaking with their supervisor. If this does not help, the employee should document evidence that can be discussed with an IE board or reasonable observer. Employees can also provide an anonymous complaint to the EPA or file a complaint with OSHA. If done, the employee should have good reason to believe that their complaint could prevent harm and
This case study analyzes the experiences of Courtland Kelley at General Motors (GM). Courtland Kelley a third generation GM worker put his job on the line by pushing the GM managers and executives to fully respond to the safety issues found while working as a safety inspector at the company. Kelley along with his supervisor Bill McAleer first discovered the issues while auditing GM cars at rail yards across the country, a spot check of vehicles before the cars were cleared to be delivered to the dealers. McAleer was taken off the audit as a result, who subsequently sued the company seeking whistle-blower protection. The case was eventually dismissed by a judge in favor of GM. The judgement only increased Kelley’s
In another employment at will case, fourteen employees from a Florida law firm were fired for wearing orange. The employees were told that management had taken the color of their shirts to mean, “that they were staging some sort of protest.” However, many of the group says that they wear orange shirts on paydays to “promote a feeling of togetherness when they would go out as a group for drinks” . An executive brought the orange wearing employees into a conference room and told “anyone wearing orange for an innocent reason should speak up”, an employee immediately explained the happy hour color. After this, the executive left the room to confer with other executives. When they returned, it was stated that all people wearing orange were fired although someone had said they were wearing the color for innocent reasons . Additionally, if the employees truly had been protesting by wearing the color orange, it would have been illegal to fire them for protesting . The employees reported feeling as though their rights had been infringed upon after being fired for wearing the color orange. These employees were fired without any warning, without being asked to even change
Employee protections allowing those corporate fraud whistleblowers who file complaints with OSHA within 90 days to win reinstatement, back pay and benefits, compensatory damages, abatement orders, and reasonable attorney fees and costs.
Jackson and Raftos (1997) referred to whistle blowing as an avenue of last resort. Employees find themselves in these situations when the authorities at their organisations have failed to take actions on reported issues affecting that organisation. Wimot (2000) likened whistleblowing to a spectrum. At one end of this spectrum whistleblowing would only cause minimal pain and scars on the stakeholders and organisation while on the other end is the worst scenario where the whistleblowing effects are turbulent and often experienced to be negative to all those involved (ibid).
In every setting there should be a policy and procedures on whistle blowing. The whistle blowing Policy is put into place to provide protection against the person in the work place against victimisation or any form of punishment (physical or verbal) when concerns are genuine. If you suffer any victimisation or punishment due to whistleblowing you may be able to take your case to an Employment Tribunal. If you have any concerns about misconduct or malpractice that is occurring in your work setting you should report it to your manager/supervisor. All information given is confidential. The whistleblower is a person that discloses wrongdoing that threatens others, rather than a complaint about their own treatment.
Devon, I agree with you about fighting a wrongful termination battle. I, personally, would never take to social media to voice my opinion about a specific incident that has stemmed from my job. That being said, I don't necessarily think it is as serious of an issue as one might think. You made a great point about working for the government and losing protection from the very law that was designed to protect you. I never thought about it until you brought it to my attention. Me and you could have said the same thing about our job but the repercussions could be completely different if one of us worked for a government agency. Very interesting fact.
I want to attend the United States Air Force Academy because I wish to serve my country as a member of the U.S. Air Force in a position of leadership. By attending the Air Force Academy, I can prepare myself to become a valuable addition to the Air Force, while also attaining one of the best educations available. At the academy, I have the opportunity to work with some of the best and brightest that our nation has to offer. Furthermore, access to the newest and most sophisticated equipment and world renown professors would allow me to work with other cadets to create and innovate technology designed to benefit the Air Force and Americans as a whole. At the academy, I can continue to learn and build upon the leadership traits I have developed while balancing and challenging myself by taking honors courses in school, playing varsity athletics, holding two leadership positions in AFJROTC, and working multiple jobs as a lifeguard and swim instructor. Additionally, I can discover and conquer more complex academic and physical challenges that I had only begun to face during my time as a high school student.
in ancient egypt there was a social pyramid of people farmers and slaves are at the bottom craftsmen are above the farmers and slaves then its the merchants then the scribes then it's the government then on top is the farrow scribes are the third level to the social pyramid peasants were the people that did the farms and constructions right below the pharaoh were the priests the priests were the people that contacted the gods. in ancient egypt they thought that social movement was impossible social movement meant that a pesent could move up to something else on the economic tree Warriors battled in wars or controlled residential uprisings. Amid long stretches of peace, troopers additionally regulated the workers, agriculturists, and slaves
Roomba is designed by the iRobot company to clean the house with its sensors and other tools without the assistance of humans. Specifically, the roomba is activated through the power button, which sends its wandering aimlessly, being limited by the touch and RCON sensor, as it cleans the floors with its brushes installed. The sensors confine the roomba to a specific room in order to prevent the roomba from falling off the stairs or being blocked by obstacles. My artifact explains the purposes of the Roomba though the uses of a images and text boxes.