Multitask Research Paper

Now trust me, that’s not very efficient. In the case of multitasking your brain is like a computer. I know, the same thing that very well causes you to be unproductive does the samething to itself. WHen you begin to run to many programs on your computer it actually slows down and may even crash causing any of the work you may have done to go down the drain. Similarly, by multitasking, you actually make it harder for yourself to stay on task as a part of the brain called the striatum has to burn more oxygenated glucose, causing you to lose focus and be more tired than before. Explain more thoroughly with

In the essay “Multitasking can make you lose … Um … Focus” Alina Tugend exams why multitasking causes you to lose focus and how it is counterproductive. Tugend explains what multitasking is in the first section and that since the 90s we have widely accepted it into our daily lives. She also brings a credible professor named Earl Miller to elaborate on multitasking and how it is explained in a scientific manor. As this professor goes on he talks about how its misleading and that multitasking doesn’t actually benefit us, it actually hinders are ability to be productive. Tugend uses multiple case studies to back up this information and to even support her own argument that multitasking causes loss of focus.

Multitasking: A Poor Study Habit by Noelle Alberto shows that multitasking is a bad thing do when studying. Ablerto gives four main points in her article, those points being, that multitasking while studying doesn’t save time, multitasking doesn’t prepare you for the business world, damages the students ability to learn, and causes students not to gain the trait that helps for paying attention. Throughout her article she provides evidence to prove these four points to a decent extent. I would disagree with the point that multitasking isn’t saving time because of having to switch back and forth between tasks. I don’t believe this point because personally I know I save time from multitasking while studying.

I believe that the article is very well-written. I think that the author makes many good points and has many good examples of how, when and why people multitask; she also has included many research studies to help support her argument (against multitasking).The author also made some very convincing arguments and points against multitasking and also how it affects society and how common it is.The only

My experience in multitasking has proved to be inefficient because of how much time I actually wasted in the long run. I was studying for a test I had while finishing my homework for another class while watching TV. Three tasks at once seemed crazy now that I think about it and it was the longest night I had studying. My brain did not process all of the material I had to know for the test tomorrow and I did not even finish the homework that day.

According to Sarah D Sparks multitasking is possible, but it is difficult for one to multitask. Because it takes away your focus from one thing to another, and your brain can’t be in two place at the same time. Younger people are more generally better at multitasking than older people because working their memory tends to be more effective in their early 20s. We can’t process two task simultaneously but it would also takes more time to multitask than it would take do one task at a time. When a person tries to do two things at a time the cortex part of the brain delays decision making of the second task. People can’t really multitask without being distracted some people find it very hard to multitask efficiently.

Multitasking is a common technique used by most people that is thought to be a way of getting tasks done quicker. With the need for speed in today’s society there is more that has to be done in a minimal time. But what people do not realize is that when they cram their work into a limited amount of time, it can backfire altogether. Within this paper will be an explanation of the negative side effects that may come with multitasking such as stress, physical health problems, and frequently making mistakes.

Starting January 26th (Friday) at 1:30 PM I began to log my activity ranging from doing my homework to going to soccer practices and games, to see what time I went to sleep every night. I continued to log this data until February 4th (Thursday) at approximately at 10:45 PM. In the recent studies where we began to log our sleep and social media usage data, it made me realize how much time I spend on homework, social media, extracurriculars, and everyday tasks. This data gave me an overview on how I should prioritize my homework while balancing extracurricular activities. Along with that, I was also able to keep track of the amount of hours I got of sleep every night and how that factored into my everyday tasks.

After all, if a person was to learn about or concentrate on a different subject every few minutes, it would be nearly impossible to retain and remember the information. As one study discovered, "multitasking adversely affects how you learn. Even if you learn while multitasking, that learning is less flexible and more specialized, so you cannot retrieve the information as easily (Rosen 412)." Most people who multitask become so distracted by the amount of information they are trying to obtain at one time that it is actually causing the opposite effect. Multitasking makes it harder to distinguish the difference or importance between individual tasks. This means that many people either dismiss all the information gain as redundant or clump all knowledge, unnecessary and essential, together.

While students feel they are great at multitasking, studies show that they actually perform academically at a lower level than those who do not multitask. A study was conducted by a respected research lab in Stanford University. Clifford Nass, a professor of communications at Stanford University, introduces us to a study conducted on carefully-selected high chronic students who multitask (Digital Nation). The experiment was structured for students to identify numbers as odd or even, letters as vowels or consonants. Professor Nass wanted to test how quickly these students can switch tasks without losing focus. The results showed that people who multitask are slower than those who do not multitask. While slower does not mean horrible, it should raise a sign that if they had focused on their work only they would get better scores in their respective studies. Sherry Turkle, in an interview, displayed the differences between two common multitasking activities: taking a break from your studies to stretch and surfing the web. Turkle says: “When you get up and stretch and take a walk around the block, you can stay with your problem. You can clear your mind; you can move your body. You can stay

Driving while focused on other tasks may cause increased traffic mishaps and accidents. Information processing of parallel processing systems suffers from bottlenecks, and may have implications in information processing which may be the case with the use of cell phones causing distractions while people are driving (Anderson, 2015). A bottleneck within central cognition stream is a central bottleneck and may cause significant effects while trying to think about two things at the same time (Anderson, 2015). As tasks are practiced they become more automatic, there seems to need less processing in central cognition. According to a Strayer and Johnston’s published study in 2001, Driven to distraction; dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular telephone incorporates a

In some cultures, multitasking is for intelligent people; similarly, in Saudi Arabia, women practice multitasking to show how they are smart and hardworking. It is one of the stereotyping that seems fascinating for most of Saudi people. Although multitasking has positive effects, it has negative consequences. To be more specific, multitasking consists of productive and powerless situations that has relationship between multitasking and health.

The beauty of working in any profession or even as in the comfort of your own home includes displaying the skills of a Multi-Tasker. In one’s own home that would include having to cook, clean, care for the kids, take out the trash, basically performing everyday duties at the same time, while still trying to find the time for yourself. For those who work remotely inside of the home have to learn how to establish multi-tasking skills working and home living at the same time, and some may not realize how easy it is to fall behind inside as well as outside of the home. The purpose of learning how to multi-task is to have your hands on multiple subjects at the same time while accomplishing one goal by the end of the day. If one decides to believe this or not – not everyone is great at multi-tasking for various of reasons, one, it may appear to be difficult to split your attention between more than one thing, two, some prefer focusing on one task at a time, or three, it just may not be that particular person’s cup of tea. At the end of day, whether you are working for a medical practice, postal service, or even in the privacy of one’s own home, multi-tasking is a necessary skill to work at, establish, and perform on a daily basis.

As the Baby Boomers and Generation X start to retire, age, and eventually pass away, a new generation is on the rise. Generation Y, or the millennials, are expected to make up 46% of the workforce by 2020 (Miller). This new generation, ranging from the 1980’s to the early 2000’s, is unlike any that has come before with the introduction of technology in the Digital Age. 1 in 3 millennials said they would prefer social media freedom, device flexibility, and mobility in the workplace over a higher salary (Miller). They will be natural web-marketers and add a whole new dynamic to the office: multitasking…efficiently. Some may say that multitasking does not exist or in fact is counterproductive, but this new generation has something to prove.

Multitasking could also be considered as distraction in situations requiring full attention on a single object (e.g., sports, academic tests, performance). The issue of distraction in the workplace is studied in interruption science. According to Gloria Mark, a leader in interruption science, the average knowledge worker switches tasks every three minutes, and, once distracted, a worker takes nearly a half-hour to resume the original task.