Munchy's Argument For Banning Teens?

It’s easy to understand why some of the parents and faculty members of the students at Oak Creek High would not agree with an open-campus lunch. They may believe that the student body is not ready or capable for handling the privileges of an open-campus lunch program. Yes, there’s the risk of students skipping out of school for the rest of the day with no return, if they have the privilege to leave campus for lunch. Also, some students may abuse the privileges of an open-campus lunch and skip out even if they don’t have a pass ID or parental consent. When those students deciding to skip without a pass get stopped and questioned by a school resource officer, they may get a loitering ticket depending on where they go when they skip, as well as a truancy

These are the reason why schools should let the students should be able to leave campus for lunch. The school gives, then after a couple months they take all the special privileges away that they gave. Students should be able to handle an hour break to go get lunch with friends, or even go home for lunch. In high school many students have their license, and most of them don’t like the food that’s being served. There could be problems that occur with students leaving, but all problems have a solution, this essay explain why this would be great for high school students to be able to leave campus for lunch.

Most of these restaurants stay open until after midnight, but the on campus version only stays open until the late afternoon. For example, at The University of Alabama the on campus subway hours are from 7:30 am to 7:00 p.m., when the subway franchise normal hours are usually 7:00 a.m. until 11:00 p.m., with some even being open 24- hours. at This is inconvenient for students with classes in the later afternoon and night time. From personal experience it is such a disappointment when your favorite restaurant is closed before you can get to it. This often leads students to travel off campus to the same franchise at a different location. The money spent at the other locations could be spent at the on-campus restaurants and help bring in more income for the University. Extending the hours of these places would also be beneficial to the university because it would attract more customers, and more customers brings in more money for the university as well as the food chain. Those who disagree may argue that on campus restaurant hours should not be extended because it would ultimately cost more money. However, since more income would be brought in from customers, it would accommodate for any extra money that would have to be spent. Allowing students and even factuality the opportunity to stop by these restaurants while on campus instead of having to travel to

Mr. Jones should not be prejudice against teens because of their age. It is unreasonable for the teens to be banned when most are the ones not making any noise. Munchy’s should be open for all because anyone that goes into that restaurant is a valued customer who helps the business. Not only does this discriminate age by banning them, this will make business go down in value with lost customers. Every dollar counts, even if it is a little money it helps

Wandering kids. Bumper to bumper traffic. Drug dealing. Is this the picture drawn when local students have fifty minutes of freedom during lunch to do whatever they please? Students should not be allowed to leave their school campus during lunch. An open campus would lead to truancy, disturb local businesses and neighborhoods, and cause crime.

Someone working at a fast-food restaurant is bound to face torment either by their peers, and have the social stain of being viewed as poor or dirty. In a personal interview with another fast food worker, Whitney said, “…a lot of them [fast food workers] do tend to have that lower class background. Also, whenever you find adults working in the fast food industry, it generally means they lack an education.” A lot of younger adolescents will take jobs at fast food restaurants because very few places will hire kids when they first get their legal working papers, but fast food restaurants tend to flood their restaurant with these juvenile employees.

Wouldn’t you rather pay less for meals at restaurants you already go to and enjoy, while eating healthier? The standard way of thinking about kids’ meals is, well, childish, but they could be better for your wallet, cravings, and health. But not all restaurants and eateries allow adult patrons to order off this menu, sometimes even “looking around for your imaginary child,” writes a Yahoo! food editor (Paley). Restaurants shouldn’t impose age limits on kids’ meals.

The availability of fast food has become an easy access to the youth of America, due to an increase in fast food marketing and restaurants being built on nearly every street corner. In David Barboza’s article, If You Pitch It, They Will Eat, he explains that

There is room for growth, as more people from the middleclass are becoming comfortable with eating out in fast-food restaurants more often on a weekly bases. One thing that is fueling this growth is that most fast-food restaurants have adapted healthier menu items. Doing so they are raising the issues that some people and parents in particular have for bringing their children there, such as McDonalds offering salads, apple slices, oatmeal and other less toxic foods, so that people who are health conscious can also visit without leaving with a feeling of having ruined their health through a bad diet.

Students could leave campus, get food, and be back for time given from the school. If students could leave campus to get either a restaurant, get food at home or a fast food restaurant the food would be so much better than the schools food. Students could go to a small restaurant tor a diner. Students could go home and make their selves food. They could go to fast foods restaurants around the area such as McDonald’s, Hardee’s, or Subway. As long as students are back within the amount of time given students should be able to leave campus to get food. School lunches are not healthy for students most of the time. You do not know what the food they are serving you is half the time. If students were allowed to leave school for lunch it would give them a little bit of freedom for an hour. If they could leave campus for lunch it gives them a chance to have a break from their classes. Many students tend to fall asleep in class, if they could have an hour lunch break they could go home eat and rest for a little while. Students may feel trapped staying in one place for 8 hours. Many students also get bored sitting in classes for so long leaving for lunch give them the chance to move around and get out of

We as society should not have to be worry about dining out or about seeing a violation sign stating this restaurant

All things considered, business owners should have the right to ban teenagers. When teenagers disrupt the public this drives adults to come during different months when they are not usually present. Teens do not contribute as much as adults do and losing adult patrons will most likely mean the end for Munchy’s. Using this marketing strategy in the long run will improve revenue for the business because they are giving adults the time to eat in a teen-free zone. Enforcing this regulation will also encourage more adults to return to the restaurant and help Munchy’s

The social structure of Chick-fil-A was well organized. The employees were polite, helpful, and professional towards the customers while remaining friendly. The employees greeted each of their customers with a cheerful smile. The employees and management were kind and helpful to each other as well working hard to help each other and their customers. A societal problem I noticed was the children, ranging from ages 3-7, were out of control and screaming while the parents ignored them and ate, letting the children roam around. A pattern I noticed over the hour was more families and children coming in at first then, later on, mainly teenagers, couples, and young adults were in the fast food restaurant eating. I noticed conformity with the children

The fast food industry both feeds and prays off the young. Pioneers in developing marketing strategies to target children, the fast-food chains have even infiltrated the nation's schools through lunchroom franchises and special advertising packages that answer public education's need for funds; in every way possible, giving the children a loyal friend to rely on. In many franchises, teenagers are perfect candidates for low-paying, low-skilled, short-term jobs and constitute a large part of the fast-food chains' workforce; and often practically run individual locations, having more responsibility than most adults.

Banishment in restaurants hostile to minors ensures that every dollar counts. Since store and restaurants need cash in order for the business to be relentless, there should not be any type of punishment ascribe to resulting in loss of revenue. However, when adolescents are not eliminated earnings will increase. In the graph, “Munchy’s patrons in October,” the source indicates that during the month