Pro Death Penalty Essay

     There are many reasons to both support and oppose the death penalty. Many people can feel very strongly about whether or not they approve of this method of punishment. I feel that the death penalty is wrong, and I believe that there is much support to back this up. I believe that the death penalty is wrong because it is not an effective deterrent, racially and economically bias, unreliable, expensive, and morally wrong of society.

4% of the criminals on death row have been wrongly accused of a crime and ended up being killed. You have a say in whether or not you want this atrocity to continue. California's death penalty system has failed. Tax payers money is being wasted on the death penalty and is also a empty promise to victims families and carries the unavoidable risk of executing an innocent person. The article Yes on prop 62 states that “there is no evidence that the death penalty lowers crime” (Hastings) The astronomical costs associated with putting a person on death row – including criminal investigations, lengthy trials and appeals – are leading many states to reevaluate and reconsider having this flawed and unjust system on the books. Proposition 62 is the

The people of California spoke their minds when they decided to keep the death penalty but they also decided to speed up the process by reducing the amount of appeals a convicted inmate is allowed to have. The death penalty pertains to criminals who commit crimes such as; during a kidnapping the victim dies, train wrecking if anyone dies, if a life prisoner assaults someone and that victim dies within a year, treason, first- degree murder under specific conditions (for hire, of a witness to prevent testimony, if committed during a robbery or burglary, of a peace officer, if committed during the course of a rape by force, if committed during performance of lewd and lascivious acts upon children, or by persons previously convicted of murder). The death penalty is not for petty crimes or mild offenses, but it is for those criminals who have done something so horrendously wrong that the community has deemed it fair that they are given the ultimate punishment for their actions. Putting another person to death is a heavy decision but once decided it should be done right away. There should not be years and years of waiting and appeals by the defendant when they have already been found guilty. This is a waste of time and money. They have already been convicted of their

Under the California law, “murder is the unlawful killing of a human being, or a fetus, with malice aforethought.” Cal. Penal Code §187. According to the provocative murder doctrine, the defendant is guilty of murder when he or she, or his or her accomplice “intentionally commits an act that is likely to cause death, and his [or her] victim or a police officer kills in reasonable response to such act.” People v. Gilbert, 63 Cal. 2d 690, 704 (1965). In such a case, evidence must show that the defendant acted with implied malice which led to a reasonable and foreseeable lethal response. Id. at 705. Malice is implied when an act involves a high degree of probability of killing, and initiating a gun battle may constitute such an act. Id. at 704.

Currently there are over three thousand criminals on death row, with seven hundred and forty six from the state of California (DPIC). While many people argue that the death penalty is an effective way of deterring crime the reality is that most criminals on death row spend their entire lives in prison and die without ever receiving a lethal injection, and wasting the tax payers money.

Since 1978 the state of California has successfully executed 13 people on death row. For decades capital punishment still remains the answer to violent and heinous crimes of the convicted. The death penalty delays closure for the families and majority are often flawed and overturned. Capital punishment causes problems within itself, those such as the cost to keep the public policy running. It is committed by an individual or insisted upon by the government, killing is still cruel in any form that it is given. Even though it is a

I completely disagree with the archaic and obsolete way of the death penalty since it's way to expensive, it doesn't make the crime go away and the person could be innocent. First off , the amount of money spent on the death penalty is tremendous. Los Angeles Times Study Finds California Spends $250 Million per Execution in a 2005 article, ACLU has reported that "California taxpayers pay at least $117 million each year post-trial seeking execution of the people currently on death row;Executing all of the people currently on death row, or waiting for them to die there of other causes, will cost California an estimated $4 billion more than if they had been sentenced to die in prison of disease, injury, or old age; California death penalty trials

As time has passed, prisons have improved because of advances in technology and staffing. Inmates with life-without-parole sentences can now serve their time in safer conditions. An introduction to a humane alternative to capital punishment has resulted in support for executions to continue to fall. The many people who are changing their beliefs are realizing that being locked in a cell for the rest of your life is an awful punishment. Some argue that it is a fate worse than death.

A teenaged girl kills a man as an act of revenge in the state of California. She took this act due to her best friend being killed by the stranger. She was said to be seen on a road that leads to a nearby beach, carrying the mans drugged body on January sixteenth, two-thousand sixteen. All was caught on video.

California has approximately the same population of Canada, and it uses the death penalty (37 million and 35 million people respectively) California will be used as a comparison for costs. Per death row inmate, ninety thousand dollars more is spent, between the extra trial costs, housing, and extra guards, death row costs an exorbitantly large amount more than a regular life imprisoned inmate. Inmates can spend up to twenty years on death row, waiting for their respective trials to be completed, to find out if they have been exonerated or not. This is part of the reason this process is so expensive. (Baskey-East, S. (2014, January). Currently many death row inmates are on suicide watch or solitary confinement from other inmates for their own safety – fellow inmates have been known to enact “prison justice” for crimes such as child molestation, and the suicide watch is for obvious reasons. But the price they pay for

The Britannica Encyclopedia declares that capital punishment is a criminal sentence in which one is sentenced to death, after being found guilty of a capital offense, by a court of law. The death penalty and capital punishment are synonymous in terms of the law (“Capital Punishment”). Capital offenses are often serious, major crimes that usually involve either the murder or harming of another individual. The death penalty process has become a long and arduous process that can last a decade or more. This process can entail innumerable appeals, public defenders stalling time and dozens of trials and retrials that cost taxpayers millions. Therefore, the American death penalty process for death row inmates should be revised and if it cannot

As the state of Alabama continues to cut funding to state parks, road construction, and the state legislature argues against teacher pay, there seems to be a majority in favor of continuing to spend valuable taxpayer money on capital punishment. As pointed out earlier, the average death row inmate stays on death row for approximately 14 years. Give the example; Anthony Ray Hinton was on

That number is 20 out of 2095. This year alone, three months into the year, there have already been six. We are quickly approaching our previous 20. The problem is, it’s costing us. According to a study made by Loyola Marymount Law Professor Paula Mitchell, between 1980 and 2012, California spent an estimated four billion on administering death penalty cases while actually only executing thirteen people. In this study she says “the legal costs, per case, skyrocket an extra one hundred thirty-four million dollars per year, which is well above the cost to implement life without possibility of parole.” Thedeathpenalty.org states that capital punishment cases burden county budgets with large unexpected costs. These counties manage these high costs by decreasing funding for highways and police and by increasing taxes. The report estimates that between 1982 and 1997 the extra cost of capital trials was $1.6 billion. That money could’ve easily either been not collected from tax payers or used for something much more efficient than being wasted on trials and cases that over 99% would not have even gone through and resulted in a death.

The ongoing problem of the death penalty system in California is the ineffective and expensive process between sentencing and executing. The Death Penalty Information Center (DPIC), a national non-profit organization serving the media and the public with analysis and information on issues concerning capital punishment, published the total numbers of death row inmates by states on July 1, 2016. From the data, California has the largest death rows in America. There are 741 inmates on death row in California. The next is 396 in Florida and 254 in Texas. However, there are just 13 executed prisons in California since the reinstatement of death penalty in 1978. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), operating all prisons and parole systems in California, published a document to analyze the

Data collected by the Death Penalty Information Center, a nonprofit organization dedicated to discussing capital punishment with reports and statistics, shows that 746 inmates reside in California’s Death Row. However, since 1976, the year the U.S. Supreme Court reinstated the death penalty nationwide, the state has carried out only 13 executions; in fact, the first occurred in 1992, an astonishing 16 years after the Supreme Court decision (“State by State”). The death penalty in California is a highly controversial issue and the topic of heated debate, especially in state government. Political decisions regarding capital punishment in California reflect the state’s divided stance on it. Although voters in California recently made a democratic effort to resolve the issues surrounding the state’s death penalty system, they are unaware of the injustice of capital punishment. The punitive measure costs both the government and taxpayers dearly, it wastes valuable time and resources, and years of human error have flawed cases in which the judicial system handed convicted murderers a death sentence.