The novel In The Woods is a story of how two investigators work together solving murderous crimes and takes many interesting twist and turns. The main investigation involves the murder of a young girl who is found on a student archeological dig site with a smashed skull. With no eye witnesses and very few leads, this investigation could easily go unsolved. Luckily, many suspects start coming to the light, but of course along with a collection of evidence that may lead investigators astray. These complications cause a ton of frustration for both the reader and detectives. Rob Ryan, one of the main characters/investigators, tells us at the beginning of the book that he is a liar (French, 2007, p. 4). The cause of his habitual lying is due to having a tragic experience as a young boy. Rob’s partner in the main murder investigation is Cassie Maddox. Cassie, is only 28 and has already made a name for herself on the police …show more content…
Although Katy’s mother doesn’t have an incriminating past, according to Cassie, her reaction to the death of her daughter was described as “unsurprised, almost resigned, as though grief was her familiar default state.” (French, 2007 p. 66). I would beg to differ on that assessment, seeing as Mrs. Devlin was sobbing nearly the whole time, and in text sounded to be genuinely stricken with unbelievable grief (French, 2007, 45-49). The reason Cassie may have thought Margaret was acting out of the norm may be due to Margaret having anxiety. I insinuate Mrs. Devlin may have anxiety due to Rob finding a bottle of Valium in the family’s cupboard prescribed to Margaret. Finding Margaret’s medication made Rob theorize that, “She’s making one or all of the girls sick, when Katy gets into ballet school she tries to put her foot down, and the mother kills her.” (French, 2007, p.66). Even though this theory is plausible, Margaret doesn’t have as much evidence against her that warrants further
Searches are over when the missing object is located, In the Woods focuses on both how and where the missing object was found. The circumstances of how the murder weapon was found are very unique. The quote: “Sean Callaghan, who claims he forgot it in the finds shed at five thirty on Monday evening. It matches Cooper’s description of the implement used to sexually assault Katy Devlin. Nobody knew it would be in the finds shed, which suggests that it was a weapon of opportunity and the shed may be our primary crime scene” of rob finding the murder weapon and the place Katy was murdered, shows how unique it is. This realization that Rob has, shows the murder weapon and the crime scene were discovered by mere happenstance. Tana French also uses
The case I chose to write on is based on a DVD that we watched in class called ‘Beaten by a hair’. In this case, a woman was reported missing after she went to work and never returned home. After the police discovered a bloody pillow case in the woods, near her house, they linked it to the missing pillow case in the woman’s room, and then realized that they had a murder case on their hands. A mystery in the case was that one of the local neighbors had mentioned seeing the woman leave through the front door of her house but the evidence says different, so investigators had to find out who left the house that morning. I am interested in this case because it was very intriguing how the forensic officers put all the pieces
The murder mystery book The Rag and Bone Shop, by Robert Cormier, tells a story about the corruption of innocence. A seven year old girl is brutally murdered, and the prime suspect is her twelve year old neighbor, Jason Dorrant. Jason tries to prove his innocence throughout the story to Trent, a stubborn and manipulative detective who always gets a confession. The story begins with Alicia Bartlett’s body being found in the woods near her home, and the investigation begins. Since Alicia had last been seen on the patio of her home with Jason, he is considered the prime suspect. Jason is a loner at school, always seen playing with the younger kids at recess, and not having many friends his own age. Months prior to the murder, Jason punched the
The book I read for my report was called “Pop Goes The Weasel.” The main characters in my book are Geoffrey Shafer and Alex Cross. Geoffrey Shafer is playing this fantasy game on his computer, which he decides to play in real life.. His character is named, Death and he is very demented. Throughout this book Shafer goes on crazed missions to kill people (mostly women) in Washington, DC. Alex Cross is a detective that is trying to figure out who is murdering these people.
A mentally ill teenage named Jessica Roger was born to Joan and Kevin Roger. As a young girl Roger’s mother was verbally abusive to her and her sister, she even went as far as trying to kill her husband. When little Roger was about eleven years old her mother left them with their alcoholic father. Roger ended up in prison for biting her sister and other acts because of her disorder, eventually she committed suicide while serving her time in a place where she just didn't belong. Although her mother showed remorse after her death and said, “she accepts blame, maybe too much, for what happened to her Jet”. On the other hand her father was unapologetic for his drinking “I still drink. It’s legal”. Roger sent her parents countless letter of how she was feeling but they didn’t do anything until after her death. Are you wonder how a mentally ill sixteen year old girl ends up on prison?
Cold case investigation is a growing concern due to increased numbers of unsolved cases and pop culture appeal. This paper will walk you through what a cold case investigation is, how one begins, and factors such as the use of volunteers can effect the outcome of a cold case investigation. Each year the number of unsolved cases in the U.S. goes up, but with limiting funding and lack of manning something has to be done to keep the numbers down. A dedicated cold case unit is the best answer to this problem.
To begin, detectives need evidence to piece together a crime, but determining what is evidence and what's not is the most difficult part of solving a case. There is a method, however, for figuring out whether a clue may be used in the case or not. This method is part of Holmes method, the scientific method, where the investigation follows the process of: observing, speculating, deducting and making inferences about the crime. During the step of observing, every detail is taken in, even the most irrelevant details, which allow the investigators to make sure that they have all the information needed to solve their case. Next comes the hardest part, a clump of the last three steps, involving the process of analyzing every single detail a case has, speculating its place in the case and deducting the information if it doesn’t fit to the speculated case. Eventually, those logical speculations that fit the case are formed into inferences, which are used to investigate the case
The documentary, Paradise Lost: The Child Murderers at Robin Hood Hills is about a horrifying murder of three eight-year-old boys that leads to the arrest of three teenage boys that stand out to society. Throughout the documentary, one can point out certain principles but two principles of psychology that stood out to me were Coercion and stereotypes.
In the vast collection that is Agatha Christie’s mystery novels, And Then There Were None is regarded as one of her best, and also possibly the most uniquely presented story of them all. The novel, known as both And Then There Were None and Ten Little Indians, provides a unique look at the concepts of guilt and justice in comparison to other detective novels by Agatha Christie and other well-renowned authors of the genre. Each of the ten characters exhibits varying degrees of guilt towards past actions, and as they each meet their untimely deaths, the reader is left to ponder whether or not the deaths are justified. Going against the standard tropes of a classic mystery novel, Ten Little Indians leads readers to question their own concepts
Humans naturally love to be perplexed, thus leading to the appeal of the entertainment apex of confusion, the detective fiction genre. However, we also crave a firm conclusion in any event of our lives, novels not excluded. While any imaginative tale may be written without any true formula, almost all of the detective fiction stories have a defined form. A crime is committed and followed by an investigation, then something almost tragic happens to the inspector, but he or she prevails and solves the case. This form has existed since the mid-1800s, yet works prior to Edgar Allen Poe’s Dupin and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes failed to attract prolonged attention. Detective fiction’s rise to fame can be directly linked to the appeal
“True Detective” This paper will examine “True Detective”, each of its episodes, and demonstrate my understanding of some of the basic components of literature and fiction. “True Detective” is a crime series written by Nic Pissolatto and directed by Cary Fukunaga. “True Detective” is about two detectives named Rustin Cohle and Marty Hart, they were resolving many cases about many missing women and children. They were looking for the murderer of many women and children in the state of Louisiana.
Detective stories are the type of genre that tends to go way over one’s head. In the sense that we are unfamiliar with dark,mysterious, and uncomfortable situations that we generally would have night terrors about. It goes deep into the idea of a world where there is just one brave soul who is willing to uncover the whole truth. There is always a lone detective that the story is revolved around, a man that is ready to sacrifice his safety in order to protect others. Chandler’s “The Simple Art of Murder” and Mosley’s “Devil in a Blue Dress” both bring out the important elements of a detective tale. The lone detective, the setting of a detective story, and the search for truth all come together to constitute as a detective story at its best.
Most often, people have an image in their mind when they think of detectives, whether the image is a man in a trench coat holding a magnifying glass, a beloved childhood character like Nancy Drew or the Hardy Boys, or the classic Victorian detective. While all of these may hold true, one specific person comes to mind at the mention of a detective, Mr. Sherlock Holmes. Along with images of detectives come preconceived ideas of what a detective or mystery novel should be or what it should contain. Within the genre, numerous authors have stood out among the others and set their own standard for these works of literature. In The Hound of the Baskervilles by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Doyle employs juxtaposed settings, descriptive imagery, and the symbolism that each convey to establish an immense attention to detail which maximizes the effectiveness of his writing in the genre of detection in this classic Sherlock Holmes story.
Despite the mystery genre having some certain rules by it, Christie broke some of these rules when writing some of her books. I want to investigate specifically the ways in which Christie wrote this book differently and to explore how and why she broke the rules of the detective genre.
My goals for the second novel, The Honey Whiskey Murders, began with exploring untapped research avenues. While I had a plot in mind, I knew it was important to stay open to the unexpected places the information took me. The research that went into the project was so entertaining, it was sometimes difficult to force myself to sit down and write.