preview

Murrah Building: An Architectural Analysis

Better Essays

This is an analysis potentially applied to the Alfred P. Murrah building; the Murrah Building was relatively a low-risk building. In honesty, the building was not notable, it was not a landmark, nor was it of critical importance. But, the use of standoff distance should still be incorporated. The installation of bollards is relatively low cost. The benefits of standoff distance are not only that of protecting but that of a more public setting. It removes buildings from the street-fronts, opening the sidewalk for more potential public spaces (The National Capital Urban Design and Security Plan). While this concept is not applicable to all locations, such as densely packed New York City, it is certainly applicable to the more sparsely spaced Oklahoma city. The empty standoff distance is not the only usable space that would be able to benefit the public, bollards have even been designed to incorporate built-in benches. This adds daily …show more content…

Bollards and barriers are all around us, without being noticed (Hart). Growing up in Washington D.C. in the post 9/11 era, I can recall walking past the Washington Monument when there were still jersey barriers present. I remember the construction and opening of the Capitol Visitor Center. At the time I had no idea why things were the way they were. Yet, that was the goal of these projects, to stay hidden and unnoticed. While the construction was obtrusive, the results were unobtrusive. Furthermore, the results were much better than the original. Pennsylvania Avenue, in front of the White House, is no longer a tan pebbled asphalt, but now an ornate and stately granite (The National Capital Urban Design and Security Plan). The same is for the paths of the Washington Monument, Its longer a cracked and decrepit black asphalt that's crumbling beneath your feet, but elegant granite, along with a decorative, and functional,

Get Access