Music Censorship Essay

Music has a dangerously potent existential force. Individuals dissolve into melodies, beats and rhythms. According to Ban (Ned) In the U.S.A, “sound only exist when it is going out of existence” (Jones). This ability within music becomes threatened through censorship which infringes and hinders artistic expression. Radio stations use censorship to edit explicit music in hopes of preserving adolescent innocence, however; there in no value in radio censorship. The significance of radio censorship is diminished because editing music for radio play is ineffective in blocking the nature of a song, radio stations kill the authenticity of music, and songs lose their integrity.

Sure, protecting innocent children from exposure of explicit lyrics is best for both parents and children, but a person's creative works shouldn’t be blocked or bleeped on the radio just because another person wants it to. The radio stations that do play the bleeped songs are usually more adult radio stations. Everyone has the option to choose what to listen to, so they shouldn’t listen to the radio stations that upsets them. Parents can monitor their kids for themselves.

As much as, music is the food of the soul (Shakespeare, Twelfth Night), is also the virus that is spreading through a town. The profanity, unacceptable sexual nature and horrific thoughts that are evident in music are being heard by the young future generations of our country, our nation, our world. Is that right? Should it be deemed today’s normality? No. Many can agree that the content that music holds often isn’t the most appropriate for anyone to hear, on the contrary, there are people out who enjoy hearing these lyrics and also the words help convey the story or the emotion the artist is trying to convey; they can hear the artists thoughts and ideas. Who are we to stop people from telling their story and others from hearing

     Musicians are artists, and often their music reflects the life that they are exposed to. I have to hear about a painting or sculpture being censored because it may seem

Music censorship is extremely common and is used everyday. Music should not be censored because artists are prevented from being able to spread their messages and teenagers are not able to express themselves with their music. Although music should not be censored, many parents do not enjoy their child listening to inappropriate music. Parents feel that some music, rap for example, is inappropriate because some songs talk about drugs and alcohol.

In today's society, all types of music artists are expressing their views, opinions and feelings in their songs about what they see and what they know. This is on of the great things about this country, the freedom to express yourself. It is not fair, nor is it constitutional that music should be censored in anyway. It is not only rap music trying to be censored it is in all types of music. They are taking away their rights and it isn't fair. As reported in the New York Times. "Wall-Mart CD standards are Changing Pop Music", Wal-Mart and other large department stores sell CD's by your favorite artists which are not what your favorite artists originally created. Some retailers refuse to carry CDs with "Parental

Musical censorship is incredibly important in certain venues and environments. However, any form of overarching censorship towards all musicians in all forms is not needed and potentially harmful. It is true that music can be hurtful, inappropriate, and racist but if the edges of normal and safety aren’t pushed, than society will never grow.

It is understandable to have mixed feelings when pondering music censorship. On the one side, the First Amendment supports freedom of speech and the values that this country was built upon. The other argument, though, is that obscene music could potentially be a factor in raised violence, teen pregnancy, etc. Therefore, I agree that the right answer is to meet in the middle, where the government is not able to dictate the type of music being produced, but the option to listen to music without explicit content is available. One point I would like to mention is that I, personally, believe private sectors (Walmart, radio stations, etc.) should have the right to censor. They are just as individualized as every other American, and their right to

Musicians should be able to express themselves any way they want to. According to Freemuse.org, article ‘What is Music Censorship?’, “Music is a free expression of the ideas, traditions, and emotions of individuals and of people. The claim states that musicians should express themselves which supports the evidence because they both agree that music is a way of expression. Art is a way to express your ideas and emotions and music is a time of art. Moreover, censorship blocks the right of expressing.

Music is a way for people to express themselves in different ways. Songs may cause people to feel different emotions depending on the genre. Additionally, listening to music is dangerous, when most songs have a deeper meaning under all those beats. Music genres such as hip-hop and rap are guilty of influencing dangerous and illegal acts. The government should censor music lyrics because they are harming society by inducing the use of drugs and alcohol, encouraging aggressive behavior, and promoting underage sexual activity.

Music trends have changed and evolved throughout history to lead up to the music trends of today. Though, some say that popular music has actually devolved in the sense of content and purpose. Most notably, people often say that popular music is much too inappropriate and should be censored or monitored. But if this is done, then free expression is lost and it could even impede on the basic human right of freedom of speech. For this being a debatable issue, there is a very simple way to resolve it; simply don’t listen to it if you don’t like it. It is after all, within an individual’s control to monitor what music they do or don’t listen to. This popular kind of music is how people express themselves whether or not it is inappropriate.

To begin with, censoring today’s musical content would be a waste of time and money, our society has more serious problems than the words coming from the radio, banning these words wont help, we could focus on the respect we give to eachother, then our good maners would stop the verbal insults and argument provoking statements.

Alexander, you touch on some very valid points such as the value of expression. It is true that the meaning of a song can de drastically changed when censored; however, the artist’s ability to freely express is retained as long as legality is retained. This is why I believe that there is a distinction to be made between government and private censorship. A prominent component to the music censorship debate is liberty (freedom of speech). Those who are against censorship are often supporters of freedom, for the privilege to create music and lyrics without restrictions is a result of the first amendment. Therefore, it is rational to allow businesses freedom in making decisions that reflect their values and beliefs, because they, just as artists,

In response to that, teenagers have an exactly different perspective about banning uncensored music. “It’s freedom of speech.” Some teenagers argue that the profanity in the music is just a way of making the music sounds good. “Singers use the bad words to show their feelings, there’s nothing wrong with that.” A lot of people argued. Some people also said music without bad words, especially rock music, will be boring. Many people around the world like how the music has profanity in the lyrics, or even how the name of the band or a singer contains bad words. But there’s also many disagreement about the uncensored music. People think nice music should not contain foul languages, they think music without the bad words will be beautiful. Especially those people who have kids, they are extremely unhappy about the fact that the uncensored music is popular because of the inappropriate words in it. For music that is uncensored, plenty of people made a lot of argument about

On the other hand, although music can sometimes be offensive it is also detrimental to young fans. Parents have aversion to music for its violent and sexual lyrics they also argue that their children shouldn’t be listening to such substandard music. Teens who listens to the music maybe influenced by to do unacceptable thing and wrongly matter but they also have choices so if parents think it’s the music they’re wrong because everyone has