Music Piracy And Piracy

Art defines us, allowing us unleash our personalities and creative abilities through forms such as painting, sculpture, and, of course, music. For centuries, music artists in specific have exchanged ideas, embracing the culture of combining folk songs and tunes into their newer pieces of music. Today, some music artists wish to carry on with that tradition in what is now known as “rap sampling”. This method of sharing music has now interfered with the modern concept of copyright. With this relatively new legal action used to protect original works, ancient traditions of sharing music can no longer be practiced freely.

In 2018 a mother of a 12-year-old girl in New York settled a lawsuit of $2000 because she was illegally sharing copyrighted music files according to www.pediatrics.about.com. Why would someone want to do that? As the person, you’re taking the money of someone else’s hard work. The artist that wrote the song took a lot of time and effort to make it. There are thousands of music artist and stealing their money is not fair for all they do. To stop this from occurring there must be harsher penalties or else artist will not have money to exist anymore or employees or money in return.

has more ways than ever to publish and distribute the things we make, and with the rise of the internet we can reach any audience with a Wi-Fi connection. This digital hyper-connectivity has led many artists to create new forms of art, some of which have gone on to start trends and cultures. One of these cultures that has become a significant part of online media is Remix Culture. The idea of taking someone else’s art and making it your own is embraced and cherished by some, and detested by others. As this genre of media has grown over the years, the line between what is and isn’t a remix has drastically blurred. Some will spend hours upon hours making a song sound completely different from its original counterpart, while others will simply chop it up and call it their own. Though laws were once effective when dealing with copyright infringement, the rate art has grown has significantly surpassed the rate at which these laws have changed. People are beginning to monetize their remixes in various ways, creating much controversy surrounding who should be getting paid, or if anyone should get paid at all. As artists, it is important to know what these laws are exactly, so we can either abide by them or find our own workarounds.

With technology changing and evolving on a daily basis, dealing with online piracy has become a harder and a near impossible task to stop and prevent. In some way or another, music can be considered durable. As seen up until today, music recordings can be reproduced at anytime and last forever. However, with that durability comes depreciation. Music deprecates as the years progress (source), and consumers have shown that they prefer new popular songs. The problem that rises with that is online piracy. When the recorded music industry began to rise between 1975 and 1999, the shipment of physical recorded music almost doubled if not tripled rising between $5.8 to $12.8 billion. As technology began to evolve, and online piracy began to shine along

One aspect of copyright law which has gained much interest recently is music copyright infringement. There are many ways in which copyright infringement in the music industry can occur, but plagiarism is one of the most newsworthy copyright infringements in the music industry. Plagiarism in its most basic form is stealing and misrepresenting someone else’s ideas or words as one’s property and not giving the true owner credit. However, proving plagiarism in the music industry has its own unique challenges, and from these challenges come an important ethical issue. In Article I, Section 8, Clause 8, the U.S. Constitution authorizes Congress: “To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.” The original purpose of copyright law is not just to protect works from theft, but also to promote innovation and creativity. However, as shown in recent cases such as Williams v. Bridgeport Music et al. and Skidmore v. Led Zeppelin, the legal system has shown its handling music plagiarism cases. By examining the standard procedure and case examples for music copyright infringement, two things become evident: The current laws adequately protect artists’ works, but in some instances, creativity is stunted by judicial system’s way of dealing with infringement. Thus, the judicial system has certain issues in heeding to the original purpose of copyright law.

I find the movie Rip! A Remix Manifesto by Brett Gaylor very interesting. Mr. Gaylor release his movie under creative common license so that we the public could remix and sample as we wanted, he is not trying to control the creativity of anyone. I had never thought about copyright laws when it came to downloading music or using small amounts of a song in a new way until I watched his movie. Mr. Gaylor is also hoping that the Fair Use law will keep him from being sued. The way that the music industry appears on the movie, I doubt that his plan will work out for him.

Music has always acted as an effective vehicle to enhance people’s lives and connect people together. Ever since the advent of the Internet, news and pop culture has been able to easily reach millions of people not only in the United States, but across the world. Music has become an even more effective medium over the past decade through the use of websites and programs that allow people to listen to music and view media online. To this day, music represents one of the major avenues of pop culture and media that people consume on the Internet daily. Social media websites like Facebook and YouTube have over a billion users (Protalinski; “Statistics”). Media that gets posted to websites like these have the potential to be viewed by some of the largest and varied audiences in the world. Artists have the ability to release music videos and promotional material online, which contributes significantly to the amount of units they sell. In 2015, many artists were able to sell millions of units and

There are $12.5 billion in economic losses each year due to Piracy in the music industry. This shows how people are not taking piracy seriously and treating it not as a crime. Piracy is a crime and people should be able to use it against people in their cases. Based on the evidence in this article, companies involved in legal action should use emotionally charged language such as "piracy" to win their cases because if they seem to be copying an artist's piece without permission and selling it for free, it is piracy and piracy is a crime that they can use.

Thomas F. Lee, President, American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada (2015) stated, “No one is eager to see copyright infringement lawsuits against individuals. But copyright infringement hurts many thousands of other individuals. Most musicians who depend on CD sales and legal downloading are not wealthy mega-celebrities. They are artists struggling to succeed without a ‘day job’. They are ordinary session musicians who depend on union-negotiated payments that fall drastically when sales fall”. The Livelihood of smaller and lesser known artist are being affected because the illegal download of their music, the illegal download of their music means that there not getting any royalty causing them to suffer financially .This surge in the illegal download off music means that many smaller and less recognizable musicians will now suffer because of the difficult to make money in the industry because of the illegal download off music. “In October, members of 5.7 million U.S. households downloaded at least one unauthorized song using P to P services, according to NPD, which tracks PC usage from 11,000 households” (www.pcworld.about.com,2015) Many artist are having their songs downloaded causing them to lose money, and without the incentive there is no reason for them to keep recording. Artist lose lot of money to illegal downloads and with them not making any money many small band will stop putting out albums. The illegal downloading of music it taking away the incentive for many artists this lowers the amount of new talent coming out and is seriously affecting the music industry. With no incentive and the livelihood and wealth off the music

For the following three song artists, YouTube and social media has brought fame and fortune. Although it has taken more than a few Facebook likes to get to the top, these artists can attribute most of their fame to the power of social media.

Music can possess a lasting power to influence the lives of listeners and inspire future works of art. Copyrights give artists and their production teams a monopoly over their intellectual creations insuring their compensation is relative to their audience’s appreciation of the work for a set period. The U.S. Copyright Law in it’s inception saw the value of limiting this monopoly in order to encourage innovation of creative works. Over the years, a complex system of royalty compensation developed based on these copyrights divvied amongst all players within the collaborative production of sound recordings. The invention of various technological mediums of sound distribution forces the music industry to adapt with new business models to

Copyright law encourages the creation of “original” creative work. Yet, creation requires influence. It is not realistic to say that a song can be completely original, containing innovating composition and sound recording. Artists gain influence from other artists, who have adopted the style of the

If I post a poem on my Facebook site and someone cuts and pastes it on their site is that a case for stealing my intellectual property?

The Music Industry’s dramatic business model change from physical sales to digital downloads, how much the record labels are affected by internet piracy and how to regulate it.

What happened in China music industry and how serious the music piracy in China music market? This paper will first present some news happened in recent years in China music factory about the music infringement lawsuits. Then it will show the whole trend and distribution of music sales in China. It will also use the microeconomic models to analyze the societal benefits under the situation of without and with piracy. Then the paper will give some discussion of existing literature about the music piracy.