My Assessment Of Practice Evidence For Term B Is Based

Evidence-based practice is extremely important in health care. It is not only important to know how to perform a certain skill, but why it should be done. There needs to be a standard of care and providers need to know the best way of doing things based on evidence. The article mentions that in the 20th century, many medial decisions were made on doctor assessment and preference (Brower, 2017). Many physicians were practicing dramatically different when compared with one another, which led to the realization that changes needed to be made and Evidence-based practice began to develop. Even though Evidence-based practices have been in play for a while, there is a gap between understanding and applying evidence-based

An informal survey of perioperative nurses, physicians and patients was performed regarding the use of thigh-length versus knee-length SCD’s. The surgical services management team, clinical nurse educator, surgeons, and materials management were also involved in the process of using only knee-length SCD’s on all surgical patients. The surgeons, staff, and patients were perceptive and willing to use only knee-length SCD’s. The perioperative nurses were hesitant at times to call the physician for an order to place knee-length SCD’s on the surgical patient. This was a barrier to the suggested change project.

In 2003, as an outcome of all the sentinel events reported to the Joint commission lead to the creation of the “The Universal protocol for preventing wrong site, wrong procedures, and wrong person surgery” (Mulloy & Hughes 2008). So, one of the ways that could have potentially prevented the situation from happening at the first place was implementing the universal protocol procedure. According to the protocol the conduction of proper pre as well as post-operating procedures are extremely mandatory. Therefore, by enforcing a standardized routine pre-operating procedure such as verifying the patient as well as the correct site for the procedure, by having the medical staff or preferably the physician marking the operating site with his or her initials before the surgery will be an effective preventive measure (Mulloy & Hughes 2008).

Bradley, S., & Mott, S. (September 2012). Handover: Faster and safer? Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 30(1), 23-32.

Conversely, the How to Guide: Five Steps to Safer Surgery is an adjunct to the World Health Organization (WHO), Safe Surgery Saves Lives: The Second Global Patient Safety Challenge. In this, the primary goal is to confirm that surgical teams not only communicate, but follow safety standards in order to minimize common mistakes and insure the best outcome for surgical patients. The standards included in this literature emphasize, “improving anesthetic safety practices, ensuring surgery is undertaken on the correct part of the body, preventing surgical site infections, and improving communication and teamwork” (Beaumont & Russell, 2012). The actual checklist consists of the following 5-step process:

The author’s intention is to identify an aspect of clinical practice which lends itself to change at a micro level. The definition of a micro-change is an intervention of change aimed at the individual or the way small teams work. The micro-level change is not to be confused with a service change (Walsh, 2009).

Indeed, "new and validated knowledge that forms the basis j Y for evidence-based practice (EBP) most commonly is discovered in academic settings. But findings need to be translated into a protocol or guideline that can be used to guide practice," according to Conner, (2014, p.40). Evidence-based projects have lead to many improved clinical practice changes at the bedside and healthcare in general; and they are highly promoted and supported by different healthcare organizations.

At least half a million deaths per year could be prevented with effective implementation of systemic improvements in operating rooms. Specifically, multiple studies have found implementing the use of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist would significantly reduce surgical morbidity and mortality due to surgical errors.

The purpose of faculty training in the nursing profession is to provide program evaluation to examine evidence-based practice in a simulation of care and provide safe nursing practice. Patients with a tracheostomy are high risk and have numerous problems for nurses to find because of respiratory problems. In addition, understanding the facility policy regarding tracheostomy care, the faculty must possess specific knowledge and skills to provide satisfactory care. Evidence-based research has provided the organization for nurses to improve nursing care standards and practice regarding tracheostomy care (Schreiber, 2015). On the other hand, the patient simulation laboratory (SIM lab) coincides with this setting because it uses state-of-the-art

Literature reviews provide adequate supporting evidence for the evidence-based practice (EBP) process (Cowell, 2016). By using the information obtained from the literature review, that supports the topic, one can evaluate a situation and arrive at the problem that needs a solution. Therefore, an appropriate technique is necessary when searching for the right literature and evidence (Cowell, 2016).

The core purpose of the national patient safety goals is to indeed promote and improve patient safety. The Joint Commission (2015) lists several of them in its 2015 National Patient Safety Goals. One of the goals the author wants to elaborate more upon is: prevent mistakes in surgery. This paper will include an overview about the aforementioned national patient safety goal. It includes three methods to be followed to be able to achieve the said safety goal. The paper also highlights the importance of the issue to the general public, to the health care institutions, and to the health care professionals. Financial implications of not achieving the goal is also explored in this paper. This national patient safety goal is a multidisciplinary issue. The important roles of other professionals will be discussed as well as nursing leadership.

"The final count is correct" is a common statement that operating room (OR) nurses use daily. This statement is a signal of safety for closing the patient 's operative site. The occurrence of a retained surgical item (RSI) was the most frequently reported sentinel event from 2010 through 2012 and again in 2014 (The Joint Commission [TJC], 2012, 2014). Counting of surgical items is necessary to provide protection and safety of the patient. One of the highest priorities for the OR nurse is assuring the final count of items used in the surgical procedure is accurate.

I used to work on medical field as a nursing assistant several years ago. The hospital is very strict, and organized when it comes to patients’ safety. Every morning, there is a briefing for fifteen minutes, and all staff should attend. During the meeting, the charge nurse talk about patients’ safety, the census, how busy is going to be that day, what need to be done, and the patient who need more attention due to fall risk. Hand washing is very important. All staff must wash their hands before and after entering the patients’ room. There are hand sanitizer all over the place, everyone must use it to avoid cross contamination. All patients’ bed must be in lower position, with floor mattress on both side of the bod in case the patient fall.

The foundation of the evidence-based practice paradigm according to Barkham & Mellor-Clark (2003), relies on efficacy research that focuses on and assesses the measurability of specific interventions. It also addresses questions about safety, and capability. The goal is to provide the best practices possible in reducing possible harm or threat to the client through practice intervention. Through evidenced based practice, potential harm can be minimized, and potential benefits maximized. According to Drisko (2011), EBP, improves clinical practice outcomes, informs treatment planning and helps to better serve our clients. It also helps identify procedures that are cost-effective resulting in the best practice and the best use of resources.

367). On the side of expert opinion, the CMS has had discourse regarding the potential broadening of events related to inadequate VTE prevention for both surgical procedures and medical patients (Maynard, 2016, p. 4).