My First International Conference On Innovation And Outsourcing

Innovation may be linked to positive changes in efficiency, productivity, quality and competitiveness, among other factors. Benefits of innovation could be the improvement in the workforce. By improving the workforce an organisation will benefit from increased productivity and improved morale and lower staff turnover. Employees will feel more valued which therefore increases motivation. This is beneficial to employers because it provides the organisation with knowledgeable, reliable staff who will have a more positive contribution to the needs of the organisation. Staff are a valuable source of innovation, even if it is not expected as a major part of their job. An innovative work environment means being creative and try new techniques. As Albert Einstein said “if you always do what you’ve always done, you will get what you’ve always got.”

“Bill Hewlett & Dave Packard founded Hewlett Packard (HP) in a one-car garage in 1939. Its first product was an audio oscillator which was used as an electronic test instrument by sound engineers. Its first customer was Walt Disney Studios. For the first twenty years, HP’s products were predominantly electronic test & measuring instruments for engineers & scientist. Since then HP has added computers, calculators, medical electronic equipment, instrumentation for chemical analysis & solid-state components. In 1980 sales had grown at a compounded rate of 23% over the last decade whereas net profits had compounded at 27%. Such a growth was consequently followed by the increasing number of employees which rose to 57,000 across the world. There are currently twenty manufacturing locations across United States & eight others around the world.” (Beer, Michael, & Richard, 1982)

The environment of an individual including culture of the company, management style, level of stress at work, etc…are also very important factors.

| Thomas, in regards to the line you comment on "innovative changes often originate from lower levels of the organization", I totally agree withthat statement due to the fact that those lower level employees are the ones who are working in the fields, in terms of having their hands on the equipment and having the full knowledge of what improvements are needed in the work field. Innovation often derive from insight and even frustration at times. Good post.

This research intends to explore innovation at an individual level, but in a context, where the roles and functions of an organization appear eminent either as a promoter or an inhibitor of innovation.

In addition, I will review how certain processes and systems could hinder innovation. Lastly, I will explain what organizational structures or processes could foster a culture of innovation at my present employer. [Good work suggesting the scope and purpose for the assignment. I’ll look to see how you make your points including your research and support for your analysis.]

HP, an expert in the hi-tech industry understands the fiercely competitive environment where technological and innovative advancements could create turbulent

7. Institutionalized Innovation: In today 's hyper-charged business environment, innovation is an integral component to any organization 's continued long-term success. For example, to thrive at Google, employees have to learn to work, and to innovate, on a much larger scale. Google has institutionalized policies that allow some of their employees to spend approximately 20% of their time pursuing independent projects of their own choosing, allowing employees to be innovative.

The American Outsourcing Case is a compilation of factual information for the purpose of provoking debates. The authors present both the pros and cons of outsourcing, and avoid inserting their personal bias. The case clearly defines outsourcing and then focuses on outlining its existence in China, Mexico, and India. The evolution and U.S. involvement in the Maquiladoras of Mexico is described first. The implementation of NAFTA and the creation of Maquiladoras were major catalysts in the growth of free trade between the U.S. and Mexico. China, in an attempt to attract foreign investors, created Special Economic Areas, which designated geographic zones that were enabled to operate under their own laws. With great tax benefits

America is characterized with excessive competition and innovation within its capital markets. This competition within industry groups provides a foundation for this innovation can occur and flourish. As firms become more profitable, competitors enter the market in attempt to steal market share and retain profits for themselves. This gives rise to competition between rival firms which results in new products and services for society. All parties theoretically show incur economic benefit. Companies make an adequate return on investment in the form of profits while society gains access to new and innovative products. Such is the nature of capitalism which is the backbone of American enterprise (The Buzz, 2011). The technology industry is no different in this regard. Competition has given rise to new and innovative solutions to many consumer needs. In fact, the technology sector has provided products society never deemed necessary until they were created (i.e. Apple's IPod). Motorola has been at the forefront of this innovation and has entered markets previously dominated by older more established companies. My aim with this document is to provide competitive insights in regards to Motorola.

As Albert Einstein said, “If you always do what you always did, you will always get what you always got.” This quote is applicable for organisation and fully underpins the value of having a culture of innovation in order to meet short, medium and long term objectives.

Having the right organizational culture is probably the most important factor that should preoccupy an organization and its top leadership. In this age of globalization, innovation makes the difference between companies that emerge successful in the marketplace and those that end up winding up operations due to unsustainability (Barbosa, 2014, p. 38). It is common knowledge in the corporate world that innovation thrives in the right organizational culture; one that promotes and fosters creativity of individual workers.

Companies live and breathe innovation; or, at the terribly least, notice it basic to their success. Such companies are those that others ought to emulate for they recognize that to do business, as Peter Drucker prompt in an exceedingly recent Harvard Business review article, “Every firm—not simply businesses—needs one core competence: innovation.”

Page eight of the case begins to outline some of the challenges that the HP-Cisco alliance had already faced concerning the sale of joint products. For example, we learn that at HP, Cisco products did not count towards a sales representative’s quota and this resulted in a decline in sales of Cisco equipment by HP sales representatives. Further, if HP or Cisco sales staff had to master not only their parent company product line,

The service industry now makes up almost as much as 60-65% of the global economy with India being a major contributor to this industry (KPMG, 2016). India has dignity to know that its country is one of the fastest-growing service sectors in the world. According to KPMG (2016), services remain the key driver of India’s economic growth and continues to grow strong and steady. The services sector contributes more than 50% to India’s GDP and is growing at about 10% per year. IT outsourcing has been a major source of employment for the people living in India. The service sector in India has exceed agriculture with a greater share of GDP and is now considered a service based economy instead of an agriculture economy. In general, the service