My Leadership Style Analysis

The theory of leaders can be autocratic, a person who doesn’t consider the person undertaking the task only getting the results. A democratic leader takes opinions of the staff and understands how they believe the best results can be achieved, whereas Laissez-faire style leaves the experienced staff to implement the work processes.

A democratic leadership style is more likely to be successful over the long term because they share decision- making power with subordinates, participate in group activities, allowed the group to make decisions about an assignment, and try not to monopolize. This type of leadership brings about satisfying and productive employees (Shafritz/Russell/Borick, 2013).Democratic leaders seek peaceful changes and allow the foreseeable mistakes to be corrected.

It is characterized by the collective decision-making of its followers. Democratic leaders offer their followers choices and support. They hold no formal position of power and gain their authority through active participation and delegation of tasks and responsibilities. This style reflects democratic principles that include inclusiveness and equal participation. Democratic style of leadership works best in a public university, a democratic nation or a close-knit neighborhood. As discussed during the presentations, some of the past leaders known for their democratic style of leadership are George Washington or Tommy

An advantage of the democratic style involves a considerable job satisfaction of subordinates, through augmenting their responsibilities which results in more interesting and diverse work (Ribbins, 1997). Bush (2008) agrees; when responsibility is shared the self-confidence of group members is enhanced, as they have a key role in planning and decision-making. The democratic leadership style provides high quality expert knowledge and skills are identified and implemented towards achieving targets (Dimmock and Walker, 2005). Grace (1995) supports this, and claims that goals are more likely to be reached since; they have been established by group consensus.

The democratic leadership style provides for a happy medium between the autocratic and laissez-fair styles of leadership. In this scenario the leader attempts to provide direction to the group without overpowering or creating follower dependency on himself. This style of leadership is most likely to provide for satisfied and empowered followers. An example of this style of leadership can be seen in a workplace where employees feel empowered to work independently with clear and concise direction from leadership.

Democratic leadership style is the leadership style I would implement. I would implement this leadership style because I feel that everyone’s opinions and views on the discussion is important. If you get a consensus of group members you get a greater view to make a greater judgment on how to build guidelines. Also getting input from all group members gets people involved and permits them to get their input for decisions that will

Different situations call for different sorts of leadership styles. A democratic leadership is better where many people's lives are in balance. However, there are exceptions to the rules (Nursing Leadership: Management & Leadership Styles, 2014). Leadership styles like democracy have advantages and disadvantages.

The democratic style of the organization’s leadership mirrors my personal leadership style. I am a true believer of inclusion constantly seeking out input of others during the decision making process. At the end, the final decision rests on the shoulders of the leader. Utilizing all three styles of leadership is essential which is dependent

After completing the leadership quiz, my leadership style is Democratic, also know as a participative leader. About.com Psychology. (n.d.), defined Democratic leaders as a leadership style that is often the most effective because, this leader encourages input from team members during decision making , although the final decision is made by the leader. This is an accurate description of my leadership style. When there is a conflict, the writer often tried to collaborate with the team to find a solution. Although, the writer usually make the final decision, getting input from team members gives the situation a broader perspective. This style often found to be effective because, in order to have goals accomplished, everyone has to work as a team,

My preferred leadership style is the democratic style. I like to see things done the right way no matter how long it takes. To achieve this style I plan to practice my critical thinking skills so that one day I will be able to make a decision in the spur of the moment. But at the end of the day no matter how long you had to brainstorm to come to the conclusion, as the correct decision is made I am happy.

The online leadership and management style test that I used to determine the leadership style that my personality may accommodate was from the psych test website at testyourself.psychtests.com. After a 15 minute questionnaire, the site determined that my personality and principles were of a democratic style leadership. The qualities that a leader or manager of a democratic style may display the following traits: May includes employees in decisions that may affect the unit, motivate staff members by supporting and celebrating achievements and milestones, efficient communication exists between the up and down the chain of command, and they believe that cooperation and collaboration is necessary.

Upon completion of my leadership self-assessment. It was determined by a strong indicator of 40 points, that I am a Participative Style leader. My second place scoring of 31 was in the Delagative, (laissez-fair) style of leadership. Coming in last was the authoritarian leader. The type of leadership style that I exhibit is also known as a democratic leader. A democratic leader is known for being very people oriented. The democratic leader encourages input from their peers, and does so with an open-mind. Often decisions under this leadership seem to occur at a much slower pace, (due to taking the time to listen to

Leadership can be defined as the ability to lead a group of people successfully in an organization. Hall, et al (2008) have mentioned that an effective leader has to be visionary, motivating and responsible in order to successfully run a business organization. In business the two key leadership styles, which are widely used in today’s corporate world are autocratic leadership and democratic leadership (Johnson, n.d.). Autocratic leadership may be explained as “a leadership style where the manager sets objectives, allocates tasks and insists on obedience” (Hall, et al 2008 p.g 401). Conversely, democratic leadership encourages “participation in decision making” (Hall, et al 2008 p.g 402). Whilst many people would consider autocratic

In order to evaluate someone’s leadership style, it is important to know some personal history about the person and some background on how they initially developed their personal leadership style. There are many leadership theories, and most people do not usually fit perfectly into only one leadership style. Leadership styles can grow and develop as we mature and understand the world around us. For these reasons, it is helpful to know a leader’s background and what they value to have a clear understand of how they lead. My background is in nursing. I started my career in 1998, but I had been a leader long before that time. I never saw my behaviors as leadership. I never lead out in groups. I was not the caption of any team or even picked

According to me I think I have got Participative (Democratic Leadership) style because I really like to work in a team.