My Leadership Theory Of Leadership

What is leadership? There are endless variations of the definition of the term, however, the one that I agree most with as defined by Ledlow and Coppola. Leadership is the ability to assess, develop, maintain, and change the organizational culture to meet the needs and the expectations of the external environment. There are many great leaders today that anyone can name off in an instant. We all try to be leaders in some part of our lives whether it be at home, in school, in our workplace. There are certain qualities that can determine the good leaders from the bad leaders. I want to learn more about these characteristics by taking assessments and determine how they affect my leadership skills and how I can improve on them throughout this paper.

The leadership module is a very wide and dynamic one. There are several definitions for leadership as Stodgill (1974, p12) states. Seeman (1960, p3) defines leadership as the acts of a person which influence other people towards a shared direction. Influence is a vital aspect of leadership as the person who leads should have the charisma and the ability to influence others, otherwise leadership is non-existent. However that does not mean that leaders are better people than their followers. Hollander (1992, p7) explains that leaders and followers should be understood in relation to each other. Leaders and followers both have a mutual purpose and attention to common goals.

During this course, the focus has been on leadership and the different theories of leadership. There are either eight to ten leadership theories, depending on the source. Those leadership theories describe different aspects of what it take to be a leader and the skills and traits of people who are considered leaders. There are two different sets of leadership theories. According to Cherry (2012), when it comes to leadership theories, “most can be classified as one of eight major types.” Those eight major types are called the “Great Man” Theories, Trait theories, Contingency Theories, Situational theories, Behavioral theories, Participative theories, Management theories, and Relationship theories. Those eight leadership theories are similar to the ten leadership theories discussed by Zigarelli. According to Zigarelli (2013), There are ten leadership styles that all have useful aspects to them, and the more that a person learns about all ten theories, they better equipped they will be to become a leader. The ten leadership theories are identical in some areas to the eight leadership theories, but there are some differences. The ten leadership theories are the Great Man Theory, The Trait Theory of Leadership, The Skills Theory of Leadership, The Situational Leadership Theory, The Contingency Theory, Transactional Leadership, Transformational Leadership, Leader-Member Exchange Theory, and the Servant Leadership Theory. After

During this course, the focus has been on leadership and the different theories of leadership. There are either eight to ten leadership theories, depending on the source. Those leadership theories describe different aspects of what it takes to be a leader and the skills and traits of people who are considered leaders. There are two different sets of leadership theories. According to Cherry (2012), when it comes to leadership theories, “most can be classified as one of eight major types.” Those eight major types are called the “Great Man” Theories, Trait theories, Contingency Theories, Situational theories, Behavioral theories, Participative theories, Management theories, and Relationship theories. Those eight leadership theories are similar to the ten leadership theories discussed by Zigarelli. According to Zigarelli (2013), There are ten leadership styles that all have useful aspects to them, and the more that a person learns about all ten theories, they better equipped they will be to become a leader. The ten leadership theories are identical in some areas to the eight leadership theories, but there are some differences. The ten leadership theories are the Great Man Theory, The Trait Theory of Leadership, The Skills Theory of Leadership, The Situational Leadership Theory, The Contingency Theory, Transactional Leadership, Transformational Leadership, Leader-Member Exchange Theory, and the Servant Leadership Theory. After

Merriam Webster has many definitions for the term theory. For example, Merriam Webster (2017), defines the term a,” abstract thought or a belief, policy, or procedure proposed or followed as the basis of action (Merriam-Webster, 2017). There are many different leadership theories ranging from many decades to the present. Everyone can relate to a specific or multiple leadership traits. I relate to the transformational leadership theory. James McGregor Burns a leadership expert introduced the idea of transformational leadership in his 1978 book “Leadership”. In the book, Burns described transformational leadership as a development where "leaders and their followers raise one another to higher levels of

I have just been appointed to organise a small team in a large corporate organisation. As I am new to this role I have been provided with the assistance of a mentor.

In today 's 21st-century world of business, good management is essential in organisations and that managers have to be leaders as well (Samson & Daft 2014). The statement that true leaders are born with important traits such as "intelligence, honesty, self-confidence…and appearance" is unfitting but rather successful development of leadership is achieved through the transformational leadership theory. This essay will describe the trait & transformational based leadership theories, on its effective purpose and compare and contrast it through reasoning backed up by academic sourcing.

To begin with, I would like to share with you some compelling examples of leadership, to explain what drives my behavior in dealing with people, I will discuss the concept of leadership how drives strength in leadership reflection on my character. Some of the great leaders in time were poor and some of them never ever went to school. They were born with the leadership skills. For instance, the Prophet Mohammed, he made a change of peoples ' thoughts then who were worshipping stones and now they became worshipping Allah “God”. They influenced by his good manners, his way of teaching with Lord Words, as well as, his patience and perseverance on people’s harmful actions. I believe these factors made him succeed to lead billions until today.

In the past few years there has been a noticeable increase our countries appetite for training, self-help, and literature on the subject of leadership. Books and programs taken from the theories and practices of coaches, athletes, chief executives, and even Charles Shultz 's animated character, Snoopy are abundant in every bookstore and coffee shop in America. While leadership is not a new concept, it is certainly being promoted as an essential factor in our business cultures and personal lives. This analysis of leadership takes a look at some of the classical models and theories and compares them to contemporary approaches.

The same principles underlie many other approaches such as a Fiedler’s contingency model of leadership suggest a productive group and effective performance of a team is based upon the style of leadership and to an extent to which the leader is able to apply his leadership qualities under given circumstances. The style of the leader is determined in terms of relationship and tasks, whereas the situational factors will include the power of the leader, relationship with the follower and the level of the situation. This theory assumes that a task-oriented leader will be extremely effective when he is able to control and influence his subordinates and the situation. On the other, a relationship-oriented leader will be extremely effective when there will be less control over the situation (Yukl, 2001).

Over the course of our semester so far, I have learned that leadership is the product of skills, behaviors, experiences, and relationships working in tandem. During this time, I ask myself the following questions: What makes a successful leader?, How do you recognize a leader when you meet one?, and lastly, Am I a good leader? With this last question I thought about what leadership meant to me personally and how I personified it in a role of authority. This paper analyzes and critically applies my personal strengths and values as an individual to a leadership context. Based on my personal opinions, data collected from personal inventory surveys, and the use of leadership theories, I intend to define my emerging leadership style.

The first week’s topic was the history of leadership theories that explained the evolution of leadership theories in different periods of time. The leadership theories have ten theories. The first theory is the great man theory; a leader must born to be, cannot change and make, such as Napoleon, Alexander the Great, Abraham Lincoln. The second theory is the trait theory; leaders should have characteristics and personalities such as honesty, self-confidence, independent, optimism, responsibility and have interpersonal skills. They can improve, change and develop those characteristics and personalities to be better in the future. The third theory is the skill theory; a person who is a leader must have three skills, which are technical skills, conceptual skills and human skills. For the technical skill, a leader should have an experience and an expert to do and to perform tasks. The conceptual skills, a leader must have an ability to think critically and analytically (cognitive thinking). The last skills are human skills, a leader must have an ability to work with others. The next theory is the style theory that concentrates on what a leader does in organizations, not on a leader position. The leader styles have three styles; an autocratic, a democratic and a laissez faire leadership style. For the autocratic leader style, a leader has a power to dictate employees, have a centralized authority, and limited employee participation. For the democratic leader style, a

There are volumes composed on Leadership theories in about every discipline. Bolman and Deal filtered through the puzzling hypotheses of literature and joined with their experience, investigations, observation and experience on four-frame model. Frame can be described as the lens of a glass so that everyone can see the world. Frame are used to through it. Frame gives every individual to establish their own business and to run smoothly. People need these frames because to know the real world and what sense and to experience it, it also helps us to guide our action.

There are volumes composed on Leadership theories in about every discipline. Bolman and Deal filtered through the puzzling hypotheses of literature and joined with their experience, investigations, observation and experience on four-frame model. Frame can be described as the lens of a glass so that everyone can see the world. Frame are used to through it. Frame gives every individual to establish their own business and to run smoothly. People need these frames because to know the real world and what sense and to experience it, it also helps us to guide our action.

Organizations of any nature will not subsist without some level of leadership. This paper discusses the nature of leadership, which depends on the effectiveness of a leader; the specific personality characteristics, physical, and social traits that set leaders apart from followers; and the characteristic of a servant leader. It also gives insight to biblical integration of the concepts and the strategies for implementing the concepts within the organization.