My Mediation Paper

A meeting with all involved parties to discuss the issue is also another good way to resolve conflict. Everyone will have a chance to speak; this is a good opportunity to hear all sides of the story and gain a full understanding of the conflict.

Traditional approaches to mediation assume that a conflict’s parties and a mediator share one compelling reason for initiating mediation: a desire to reduce,abate,or resolve a conflict.To this end,both sides may invest personnel,time,and resources in the mediation.This shared humanititarian interest maybe the only genuine reason in a few instances of mediation,but normally even this interest intertwines with other, less altruistic,

Fells (2016, p. 211) wrote “ just as a doctor works to bring a person back to health, so too a mediator works to bring a deadlocked negotiation back to a situation where the parties can reach agreement”. This essay discusses this statement with reference to contemporary research on dispute resolution. In order to comprehend how this is achieved, we must consider the essence of mediation, the different types of mediation and what mediators do. Negotiation and mediation are process used to resolve opposing preferences between parties. Negotiation is defined in Fells (2016, p. 3) as “a process by which two parties with differences that they need to resolve try to reach agreement through

Incorporation of advocacy and mediation in human services advances conflict resolution through advocacy and mediation. Professionals in the human service field acknowledge the advantages of alternative conflict resolution applied in mediation promoting shared change. A mediator is a neutral third party who assists to resolve a disagreement or conflict by exploring crucial issues, resolve misunderstandings, look at solutions, and discuss a jointly favorable outcome. Mediators set up guiding principles throughout the mediation process. In addition, mediators help better the communication among disagreeing

Another critical tactic that mediators should possess is curiosity to see the crack and reach down to the roots of the conflict that they are assigned to. In Hamilton Broadway, Hamilton’s prayer to God can be a good example to learn from in the mediation process. He says, “And when my prayers to God were met with indifference, I picked up a pen, I wrote my own deliverance” (Alexander Hamilton). Just as Hamilton felt lost when his prayers were not answered, the parties in meditation could get frustrated by the indifference of their mediator. Mediators should develop a high level of curiosity to gain the parties’ trust that he is capable of helping them solve their conflict. It is important for the mediator not to give the parties his or her

Several of us, might already be using the different techniques that are mentioned throughout this paper when dealing with conflict or mediating or coaching others who are involved in conflict. Prior to this course, I thought there was only one way to facilitate the mediation process, and it was the mediator’s role to work that model until the mediation process had convened. Kenneth Cloke writes in several of his case studies from the book, The Crossroads of Conflict, that he would regularly work with clients and “coach” them through the dispute. This took place through multiple sessions with the clients. Conducting mediations through staggered meeting times allows for numerous opportunities for the mediator to work with the clients to develop their own confidence and competence to successfully involve themselves in the conflict in a constructive way. There is a common core and skill set used in between mediation and conflict coaching, but at the same time, conflict coaching requires a separate and distinct process combined with a separate theory of its’

There are three major conflict interventions: mediation, arbitration, and negotiation. Each of these interventions have pros and cons. Mediation is the one intervention that incorporates creativity in the resolution process so it benefits all disputants involved. Mediation also promotes collaboration and cooperation more so than arbitration and negotiation do. It is also a more cost efficient for the disputants and is more likely to resolve conflicts quicker. Mediators help defuse anger, improve communication, and specifically work on trust building. Mediation ensures that the matter can be handled privately without risk of public reprimand. On the other hand, mediation does not always result in a settlement like arbitration does. Mediation

The conflict role that my partner and I are interested in exploring is mediation. The type of mediation we will be focusing on is community mediation. The reason we are interested in this field of study is because conflict is inevitable. We face conflict in everyday life with family and friends, within relationships, at work and the list goes on. However, conflict brings about change. We have a choice of how to deal with conflict, either positively or negatively. Failure to deal with conflict could lead to damaging an individual’s relationship and business. Conflict that is unresolved tends to lead to avoidance, confrontation and violence. Providing mediation helps to look for new approaches and solutions.

Mediation is “facilitated negotiation [that] employs the services of impartial third parties only for the purpose of guiding, coaching, and encouraging the disputants through negotiation to successful resolution and agreement” (Engleberg &Wynn, 2010, p.223). The downside of this approach is that it is not always certain that it can work and valuable time go to waste while mediating as members may not reach consensus. However, the benefit is that mediation can happen in-house as long as the mediator is not directly involved in the conflict. In this manner, I can save cost and valuable operational time.

Chapter 18 was about the strategies for multiparty mediation. A mediation may start as a simple child support case can end up becoming a multiparty mediation, when children and new spouses come into the picture. A multiparty mediation may be conducted in different formats; formal whole-group format consists of cross table negations between different people. This format is good for introduction, opening statements, creating an agenda, and trying to identify needs and interest. It is not effective for deep probing, agreements, or refining proposals. Another format is a Caucus, this is one of the major formats that can be used for teams to work out differenced and develop agreements that can be brought back to the rest of the people in mediation.

While being part of the Families in Transition VISTA (Volunteers in Service To America) Program, I experienced the most difficult negotiation of my career so far. During the course of one year, young professionals are placed in nonprofit organizations across the United States under the premise that a year of service is an opportunity to grow professionally, personally and improve the quality of life of millions of Americans living in poverty. For that reason, I had the opportunity to work along with two other women for the New Hampshire-based homeless services provider. During the course of the year, 3 evaluations with our direct supervisor were scheduled. One at the beginning of the year, the second one during mid-year and a third one, at the end of the year. While working closely with other individuals, conflicts may occur.

mediation is a give and take between the two parties until both reach a settlement that they find

In broad terms, conflict resolution refers to the process two or more individuals utilize in order to reach an agreement to a dispute or debate (Miall, Ramsbotham & Woodhouse, 1999). While there are many specific components to conflict resolution, the application of each facet is strongly tied to the specifics of each individual conflict. In the case of Brian and Jon’s office space conflict, the pair should examine the relevant concepts of fractionation, framing, reframing, and common ground. Ultimately, if the two colleague’s cannot reach an agreement(s) on how to move forward working together, mediation can be utilized as a last resort.

Parties involved in mediations have a tendency to talk about the things they don’t like or disapprove of in each other rather than what’s personally important to them. Reframing is a way to capture what’s important to the speaker while leaving out what’s supposedly wrong with the other person.

3. As the mediator, how did you work to calm negative emotions that arose during the mediation? If no negative emotions arose during the mediation, then how had you prepared to handle