My Non-Science Degree: A Comparative Analysis

Teaching of evolution has several issues. One of the main issue is that it is unfair to some students with a

Think back to a time in class when there was an open-ended discussion. The teacher would start the discussion with a question or topic and the class would respond accordingly. Usually each question or topic had multiple points of view. The discussion would start when a peer would state their point of view and then another would either support that idea or contradict it with something else. There would be no right or wrong answer, but it would bring to light many suggestions most people in the class would not have thought of on their own. New ideas are born through discussions and opinions. Thinking about and accepting other’s opinions is how we grow and mature. That doesn’t mean we have to agree with them, it just means we have to give their opinions some thought and respect them. Maybe they

We should not be blind to arguments made by our peers and professors, rather we should argue for our specific beliefs. If these beliefs turn out to be incorrect, we should be willing to change our stance on the issue.

I think if science continues to advance, there will never be peace between it, and creationism. I believe so because it will continually defy each other and never become something that can be taught together and make sense. I also believe that the tax-payers should be the ones to make the decision of what curriculum should be taught in schools. Their money is being sent to these schools and many of them send their children to them. Therefore, I feel they should have a say in what their children should be taught outside of their

In the article, “Why we undervalue a liberal arts education”, written by Adam Chapnick posted March 6, 2013 explains people to understand the importance of liberal arts degrees. He wants people to how the importance is the same as STEM degrees. Most people believe STEM degrees are not successful life choices. He believes people don’t know what they learned so they need to teach liberal arts better and different so the people who graduate actually know what they learned. This article is not a credible source it is just his claims. Adam Chapnick’s article “Why we undervalue a liberal arts education,” needs more facts and reasons to back up his claims because his article is not factual mostly opinionated and to be credible facts must back up

With significant facts, it is nearly impossible to go against them. My viewpoint of biofuels was altered when my biology teacher informed me about the pros of it. A few weeks before, I read an article about how more vacant land would be used for the production of biofuels. When she showed my class a video that described all the benefits of biofuels, my point of view was altered. I did not know much about the topic; therefore, I was easily persuaded. Many people are often discussing information they may have seen on social media, so they may or may not be certain of the information they are presenting. (Green World Investor) The most important way to communicate with people in an alternate filter bubbles is to remember that not everyone thinks like you. This means that you should be open minded about general conversations. Just because someone disagrees with what you say, does not mean they are senseless. Being open minded means considered the opinions of another person. Sometimes when I do not agree with my friends, I still try to consider their standpoint.

Steve Jobs once said that “The reason that Apple is able to create products like the iPad is because we've always tried to be at the intersection of technology and the liberal arts.” Apple is now a multinational company selling more and more products every day. Their success can be credited to the balance between knowing what people want and how to give it to them. Figuring out how to give people what they desire is the technological part of Job’s foolproof equation. The word liberal is loosely defined as free, free speech, free thought, free healthcare… The liberal arts degree is seen as the study of expression in different medias like visual art or literature. Many want to completely obliterate the liberal arts degree and others think more

How would you explain your choice to pursue a degree with APUS to a younger version of yourself?

The debate over the origins of the earth and of life has captivated and divided America since the late 19th Century. Evolutionists and creationists have battled in courtrooms , churches , academia , and public schools over the course of the 20th century and continue fighting, or attempting to make peace over, this culture war today. The debate has changed between the time of the Scopes Trial and the present in several important ways. First, creationists have developed many more diverse arguments, and employ not only biblical and moralistic arguments, but scientific evidence, logical arguments, and political rhetoric to counter evolutionary theory. Second,

One of the most controversial issues today relates to having a university degree. While most people do believe with good reason that a college degree plays an essential role in a successful life, some people have accomplished many great achievements with no college degrees. While getting a college degree remains the safest course of action, it is possible to achieve great success in many fields without one.

Reading others discussions and replies, it brought comfort knowing we are not alone with our fears. Recognizing that most of the fears are similar, I have to confess my anxiety has lessened resulting in a more positive outlook that I can earn my BSN degree. This in not a competition, we are nurses choosing the same path to pursue our educational goal, with that it gives me a sense of comfort. Think about how frightening it was to experience our first code blue, IV start, bed bath, hand washing skills lab. Also when we had that feeling that our patients really depended on us to listen, care and save their lives, we were their only voice at times. We overcame through all of our first and we will overcome our individual fears online courses, the

Despite great efforts to convince the opposing side, a battle still brews amongst creationists and evolutionists over the beginning of life and the universe, but neither opinions’ palpability can be firmly upheld through scientific manners. Since science can only prove hypotheses that are testable and based on current observations, neither creation nor evolutionary concepts can be proven with irrefutable evidence. However, regardless of the inability to prove either concept, most public school systems promote evolution as a scientific fact. Many students who lack firm beliefs about the origin of life believe what they are taught without giving any personal thought to the matter. Instead of robotically absorbing biased information,

evolution and inventive theories are inevitable, life will go on and new discoveries are bound to happen with time. I think it is important to have kind of a neutral understanding of both sides because that is usually the best road to take; that way you can understand each side and basically take your own personal stance on how things truly happened throughout history. For the sake of understanding, more personalistic views are taught when we are younger because they are

Several consistent messages emerge from looking at the wages of graduates across institutions. One is that graduates’ first-year earnings range widely. In all five states, at least $18,000 separates the schools where bachelor’s graduates earn the most from schools where graduates earned the least during their first year on the job. The difference between master’s graduates from different institutions ranges from more than $10,000 in Arkansas to more than $40,000 in Tennessee and Texas. At the master’s level, across the states, graduates with degrees in mechanical engineering, computer/information sciences, and mathematics are the highest paid, with chemistry graduates also earning more than graduates from the remaining fields. “In Texas, where

The analysis of the data begins by observing whether or not there is a correlation with STEM and non-STEM areas of study to men and women. If there is a correlation of STEM and non-STEM areas of study to men and women then one can accurately predict the academic outcome of people with degrees in STEM and non-STEM. This is done by observing how many men and women who have majors in natural sciences and social sciences/humanities and if there is a tendency of a gender choosing a particular major within a certain field. In Table 1 a Chi-Square test of independence was performed to determine whether the majors in natural sciences and social sciences/humanities were equally preferred. Preference for the two areas of study were not equally