My Peer Feedback: Annotated Bibliography

A strategy I will use to ensure that I have properly cited my sources will be to utilize me resource table that I enter all used resources. This allows me to access these resources easily, ensure I have the proper APA format, and

Content is disorganized and writing has numerous grammar, spelling, or syntax errors and APA formatting errors. Spell check and grammar check are not obvious. More than 11 errors noted.

While I appreciated that one of my peers provided feedback on my work, I feel that the feedback that was provided did not fulfill the assignment. My peer did not provide detailed feedback on my paper that could be adequately incorporated in my review and revisions. Most of the information that was provided as feedback were simply statements that reiterated what the prompt question was. Please see the below feedback provided to me by my peer.

Could you give me advice as to what I should correct in APA errors, and writing errors, so I can hopefully get full credit in this area next time. I have to admit I was not really sure what you wanted with this assignment I hope to do better next time. I have attached a copy for word formatting and pasted a copy.

Instructions for Part 2: In the tables below, replace the sample material with full APA citations and annotations for four sources, at least two of them academic. Your annotations should each be 100-150 words and accomplish the following: 1) identify the main claim (thesis) of the source, 2) identify the main type of evidence used to support the main claim, and 3) provide insight into the warranting assumption that connects the main evidence to the main claim. Do not plagiarize your annotations from article abstracts (or the sources themselves).

At this point, you should now be able to summarize your evaluations and connect it to your research report. Do not forget to emphasize its contribution to the field, as well. Again, avoid subjective assessments that you cannot justify. End your critique with an APA formatted reference list. Remember to use the heading “References,” not “Bibliography,” or “Works Cited.” Also, do not put the font in bold. Center the word at the top of the page, like what you will see on the next page. Also recheck your parenthetical and in-text citations and make sure they match with your references list to avoid unintended plagiarism. Make sure your reference list is alphabetized and properly indented. Word count of this dummy critique: 458 words excluding

APA citation followed in references (in text citation appropriately done, web references and magazine references appropriately done )

Other things you shouldn’t use as passwords are your birth day, a family members’’ name or birth day, zip codes, family pet or anything that is special to you. Those are the easiest to crack.

Discussion Board—Your initial response will be a reflection on last week’s peer review process from last week. Explain three pieces of feedback and how you incorporated this feedback into your final draft. Also, did you agree with the feedback you received? Why or Why not? Then, respond to at least two peers. Compare and contrast your responses with theirs’. Did you see any patterns? Share your findings with your peers.

Annotations are descriptive and critical; they expose the author's point of view, clarity and appropriateness of expression, and authority. Creating an annotated bibliography calls for the application of a variety of intellectual skills: concise exposition, succinct analysis, and informed library research.

You even provided us with an example of how an annotated bibliography should look like and what was considered a peer reviewed academic article, which I think was very helpful.

Thank you for your response. You are correct in the punctuation and grammar. Rereading and constructively reviewing grammar and punctuation will be done Some issues like the Illustration versus Table I have not yet found in the APA manual but i know now and I have changed that. No changes in my methodology, except maybe only passing out the survey once versus twice. You and I had spoke of only passing it out one time to the staff, but it was after the approval. This is to late to resubmit, so I will continue as written in the IRB approval.

Emberlynn Leach provided a thesis statement at the end of the opening paragraph, which is an appropriate location. This statement consisted of two sentences, which were "The idea is that each approach; Psychoanalytic, Reader-Response or Deconstruction, has its own significance and meaning. However, although one may approach a piece of literature from any of these critical perspective, ultimately it is the individual reader who assigns the importance and understanding of the work."

I feel I have significantly improved on my aspects of punctuation in grammar; the progressions Leslie suggested to me on said aspects synchronized with the grammar lessons taught in my English Honors class. I also feel that my vocabulary has developed extensively throughout the course, as well as my structural and organizational skills in my writing pieces.

I utilized the feedback provided by my instructor to improve my performance on subsequent responses and coursework.