preview

My Response to an Inspiring Blog About Whistle Blowing Essay example

Decent Essays
Open Document
Thank you for your inspiring blog.
In your blog post you raised the issue of whether whistleblowing is believed to be morally right or wrong.
Davies states that Whistleblowing always comprises a definite or at least acknowledged an objective to prevent something bad that would otherwise occurs.
What Vokes has done is ethically correct. He followed the proper channels, which is to approach his company’s managers and seniors. This is because he was not pleased with the overall care from the company.
You have rightly pointed out the position of Vokes and his tactic before going public as a whistleblower. The actions and the approach have a place in Davies “Theory of Complicity”. This is demonstrated by the circumstance that Vokes morally…show more content…
Therefore, one has to ask how can a practice that has brought about so much good and prevented so much harm not be ethical.
In your blog post, you said that “even the most dedicated that there must be a limit to the amount of loyalty that an employee has towards the business.”

I should argue that there should be no reason why an employee should have loyalty to the company.
Vokes has ethical duty of blowing the whistle to sure there is a safe place to work which will increase happiness and decrease harm.
Duska claimed that a person may have a casual relationship but they do not owe any loyalty to these casual encounters. Duska also believed that the main goal of a business is to make profit, if you do not make a profit your business will soon ceased to end. A relationship that requires loyalty is of give and take which involves faithfulness, honesty, reliability and mutual enrichment. Loyalty requires us to consider the needs of others and not to always act in own self-interest. So, loyalty requires only people with constant relationship in our lives whom we trust them but not just any relationship.
Some however see it as an act of disloyalty to the employer who is the means of the employee’s livelihood. Duska argues in his article of “Whistleblowing and Employee loyalty” that is no obligation to loyalty because a company is not a person, it’s an instrument with a specific purpose of making a profit. He defines a loyalty relationship as
Get Access
Related
Get Access