My Reflection About My Essay About My Writing Skills

Thousands of people will attack the death penalty. They will give emotional speeches about the one innocent man or woman who might accidentally get an execution sentence. However, all of these people are forgetting one crucial element. They are forgetting the thousands of victims who die every year by the hands of heartless murderers. There are more murderers out there than people who are wrongly convicted, and that is what we must remember.

My weaknesses include needing considerable time to write an essay, the fact that I need to teach myself how to diagram a sentence, and lack of consistency. I am also neglectful of my talent and in sharing my work for commercial purposes. I am a better writer for having the opportunity to take this particular course, which clarifies the fact that writing, like any artistry, must be practiced regularly, and technical rules must be exercised until they are second

Do I have any strengths and weaknesses as a writer? Of course, I have some weaknesses, but I am a capable person. Thus, when it comes to writing, several of my weaknesses are noticeable. However, I have various strengths that help me; otherwise, it will impossible to finish my essays successfully. Writing is tough for me, but I strive to accomplish an acceptable work.

I.     After spending ten long years on death row, he is escorted today by the warden down the dimly lit white hallway to the room in which judgement day will finally arrive. As he moves closer, he begins to regret having led a violent life of crime and murder that had caused him to be sentenced to death so long ago. The door finally opens, and there he stands face to face with “old sparky”, a.k.a. the electric chair. He is strapped in and a leather helmet containing a wet sponge is placed over his head along with a brass liner that functions as an entry electrode through which nearly 2500 volts of electricity will pass. The exit electrode- a band of brass also with a soaked sponge- is attached to the prisoner’s

Capital punishment also known as the “death penalty” is one of the many sanctions used for violent criminal whom are convicted of heinous crimes. It is a government sanction in which criminals are put to death by the state government. There’s an on-going debate regarding the pros and cons of the death penalty. There are some individuals whom support the penalty and also a large number of individuals whom are totally against the death penalty. There is no clear decision whether the death penalty is effective and provides a sense of deterrence or whether it’s simply a costly mistake. But is the death penalty influencing others not to commit crime or is just a sanction that cost a lot and no one pays attention to?

Back in the 1600’s, British settlers were just beginning to arrive in North America and were exploring the vast lands. They began constructing permanent settlements such as Plymouth and Jamestown. With them, they brought along many customs from Britain; one of them being the way with which they dealt with prisoners: the death penalty. Britain was one of the biggest influence for the use of death sentence in the United States, though various places in Europe also used it. In the settlements and towns, they dealt with criminals by executing them in various ways, including hanging, drowning, shooting, and burning at stake. Some of the most common reasons that led to a person being executed were treason, murder, theft, religious matters and sexuality. (Part I History of the Death Penalty). Nowadays, death penalty is a theme of controversy, not only in the United States, but also in the rest of the world. Death penalty is highly controversial because it puts into question the causes of morality, capital costs, ethnicity, constitutionality, discouragement, motives, professionality, and justice.

Twenty-six percent of individuals responded with a ten when asked if the victim’s family gained more attention. Seventeen percent said the victim’s family did not. However, the remaining results varied from four to nine, with nine meaning the victim’s family gained more attention from the criminal justice system. Question seven asked individuals to describe the death penalty using one word. The word that was used the most was “cruel.” The use of that word by participants was not surprising at all. The next common used word was “justice.” The use of these two words were simply interesting. This is simply because with they can almost act as antonyms. This indicates there were definitely mixed beliefs about the death penalty. A few negative words that were used to describe the death penalty were tragic, inhumane, abomination, unlawful, judgmental, wrong, and flawed. In comparison, words such as deserving, karma, complicated, and irrevocable were also used to describe the death penalty. The last question included in the survey was a short response question. Participants were asked to discuss the different ways that the families of the accused could cope with death penalty. I was very pleased with the responses. One-fourth of participants indicated that prayer was the answer. They insisted that religion and faith were the appropriate approaches to dealing with the tragedies experienced during the death penalty. Some individual even suggested something as simple

In California, two propositions about the death penalty will be voted on November 8, 2016. The first one is proposition 62, which requires repealing the death penalty and replacing it with life imprisonment without possibility of parole. Another one is Proposition 66 that claims to reform a death penalty system by limiting processes of appeals and appointing attorneys to accept capital cases. Although whether repealing or reforming death penalty is still controversial, the current debate reflects that the death penalty system in California is dysfunctional and should be changed as soon as possible.

For as long as one can remember capital punishment has been a cruel method of punishing the convicted. However, many believe that the punishment should be corresponding to the crime. We have heard of the saying, “An Eye for an Eye a Tooth for Tooth,” (Deut. 19:21 1984). This controversial method which has been abolished by various countries and states has persuaded numerous people to believe life without parole is more appropriate than the death penalty.

The concept of capital punishment is one that has successfully caused massive controversy in America throughout history. Also known as the death penalty, this is an extreme form of punishment that can be placed upon a person who has committed a crime (in most cases, murder) that the government deems worthy of execution. In current times, the death penalty usually comes as a result of extreme cases of murder in which the court decides the convict deserves to die. Because of its intensity, the topic is one that has been very debated amongst American citizens over time. Many oppose the idea because they believe it to be inhumane and unacceptable in many ways. However, as long as there have been those who are against it, there have also been those who support it. Supporters of capital punishment see it as a way of getting justice as well as a possible tactic of prevention. Throughout time, people’s opinions on the matter have fluctuated between the two differing beliefs, failing to ever find any points in between to agree on. According to The Changing Nature of Death Penalty Debates, written by two sociologists at the University of Florida, Michael L. Radelet and Marian J. Borg, people’s overall support for the death penalty went from 76% in 1991 to 80% just three years later (Radelet and Borg 2000, 44). The statistics in regard to people’s support of the death penalty among American citizens has continued to vary since then. In his book Capital Punishment, Third

The Death Penalty seems to haunt the US mindset. While more countries are dropping the procedure as cruel the US still holds on. Eighty percent of Americans are still for the Death Penalty, citing revenge as the main reason, which is why families are allowed to watch the execution . Organizations like Amnesty International condemn the US regularly, as well as most Democratic nations. What I want to address is why the dialogue is ineffective. The proponents of the Death Penalty make arguments aimed at people's deepest emotional fears. They develop an idea of revenge within people's minds by suggesting the death of family members and create sympathy for families' victims. On the other hand groups like Amnesty

Today, one of the most debated issues in the Criminal Justice System is the issue of capital punishment or the death penalty. Having said that, crime is imminent. We could have an unexpected encounter with a criminal committing crime on a daily. Criminals have become a part of our daily lives. Does this mean we should let them prevail in our society? No, absolutely not. Eliminating crime and criminals is our duty, and we must not ignore it. Getting the rightly accused to a just punishment is very important. Some criminals commit a crime because they have no other option to survive, but some do it for fun. I do not advocate death penalty for everybody. A person, who stole a piece of clothing from a department store, definitely does not deserve the death penalty. However, a serial killer, who kills people just because or for malicious reasons, definitely deserves the death penalty. The death penalty should continue, in order to eliminate the garbage out of our society. Not everybody deserves to die, but some people definitely do. I support the death penalty for several reasons. Primarily, I believe that the death penalty serves as a deterrent and assists with reducing crime. Moreover, the death penalty assures safety to our society by eliminating these criminals.

Capital punishment has been a cause for debate for many years, and people continue to disagree on the topic. There are many reasons why the death penalty should be used, but the three most important are that it deters potential murderers from committing crimes, it saves our government money in the long run, and most importantly, it guarantees that these convicted murderers will not kill again. Why does the United States need capital punishment? The main purpose of the death penalty is to protect the rights of other Americans to live. In his book, The Law, Federic Bastiat writes, “humans have inalienable rights that existed outside of and before government. These rights are life, liberty, and property. The only legitimate purpose of

Capital Punishment: a.k.a. the death penalty. To kill or not to kill. This is an extremely controversial question in

Capital punishment also known as the death penalty is when a person who has been convicted by the court of law can be sentenced to death. This occurs when a defendant is being tried with a criminal offense; such as the conscious murder of a peace officer on active duty, or a federal agent. This punishment has been a constant debate throughout our history. People claim it to be unjust or a cruel and unusual punishment, while another part of our population claims that this consequence is not used enough. Capital punishment is not a problem only here but around the world as well; there is constant arguing and debates, here and around the globe, about the moralities of this punishment. This has been an unsurpassable struggle from the