preview

Myspace And Myspace By Danah Boyd Analysis

Better Essays

Before I read Danah Boyd's essay, I was confused with the title "Viewing American class divisions through Facebook and MySpace." I was thinking how American class (in school) divided by these social networks, but now I understand that she was talking about social class. Her content was abundant that she used such advanced terminologies to describe those users of MySpace and Facebook. The most wonderful part of this essay was she used neutural (but a little bit partial) point of view to convey her thought based on some judgements. Boyd wrote “I don’t have the language to get at what I want to say, but I decided it needed to be said anyhow.” The class divisions of social networks are really hard to explain to readers what was going on by putting …show more content…

In this case, she gave them an advanced call, "hegemonic teens (middle/upper class, college bound teens)" and "subaltern teens (Marginalized teens, teens from poorer or less educated backgrounds)." She once said "Facebook is what the college kids did." In addition, "MySpace is still home for Latino/Hispanic teens, immigrant teens, ... and other kids who didn't play into the dominant high school popularity paradigm." Just these two simple sentences, she drew a line between those who use Facebook and MySpace to distinguish the favoritism of these "hegemonic teens" and "subaltern teens." Obviously, social networks were divided by their favoritism. However, her terminologies invisibly revealed that she was more favor in "hegemonic teens". That is why she emphasized their origins and uses in her essay and in her response. Even though she was convincing us "hegemonic teens" do not mean literally to have more power or authority than "subaltern teens," she stated "hegemonic teens publicly uphold the values of adult society" while "subaltern teens are often interpreted by hegemonic mass media in a way that they are always seen as failure." Is that not enough to illustrate her standpoint? She used a better way to put a higher value on Facebook users and look down upon those MySpace users. In this circumstance, she was not saying what she needed but what she …show more content…

She described how "good" kids are flocking in Facebook and "bad" kids are flocking in MySpace. Many of them left MySpace for Facebook in high school. Those who use MySpace tend to be high school graduated in working class and those who use Facebook are upper class with higher college education. She used an example in military to emphasize that "hegemonic teens" and "subaltern teens" are divided by these two social networks as the reflection in high school. "Soldiers are on MySpace; officers are on Facebook." The author illustrated the Facebook users received college training while MySpace users were poor and less educated. Even those soldiers' profiles revealed their violent natural characters. Therefore, the military ban of MySpace would considered as a class division in military. The author guessed that MySpace users may spend too much time on-line and the officers want them to pay more attention and responsibilities on their duties. It just an educated guess because nobody know whether this class division would have any conflict of their respective interest. I think this was one of the reasons of this military ban. "Facebook is extremely popular in the military." How clear was it shown in Boyd's perspective that MySpace would be an obstacle for Facebook in the military. That is why she would emphasize "extremely popular" as she was

Get Access