preview

Naked Ape Research Paper

Decent Essays

The Naked Ape,
Why do Humans have no fur?
Introduction
The evolution of hairlessness in humans is a problem that puzzled experts for a long time, one which has many hypothesises, but has no clear front-running theory. At first, the loss of most of the body’s hair seems to be an obvious disadvantage, with the forfeit of protection from both UV radiation and cold temperatures (Rantala, 2007). However humans are quite as naked as it first appears as they have the same number of hair follicles, it’s just the density of the hairs is more spread out and size of hairs is much smaller than other apes (Pagel and Bodmer, 2003).

Cooling hypothesis
The most generally accepted reasoning for the relative nakedness of humans was evolved as a cooling device …show more content…

It assumed in this period these apes were forced by interspecies competition from an arboreal existence to feeding on the shoreline, hunting for food e.g. shellfish. As these apes became more adapted to the aquatic environment they lived in they evolved nakedness and increased body fat to be able to regulate the temperature easily like other aquatic mammals for example whales and dolphins. Furthermore, the loss of fur from their bodies made them more streamline and therefore more like to succeed in hunting for underwater prey. Although fossils of early human species have been found close to the shoreline (Rantala, 2007), it is unlikely that humans ever had a totally aquatic life without further adaptation to the aquatic environment which would have reduced survival on land. Furthermore, both the aquatic ape and cooling hypothesises don’t explain why hairlessness has been kept for millions of years after humans moved out of the environments for which it is adapted …show more content…

Therefore, it is reasonable assumption that hairlessness was evolved as a way of reducing the load of ectoparasites. As naked skin facilitates the quick identification and removal of ectoparasites, as well as being easier to clean an infection than dense fur (Pagel and Bodmer, 2003). Also many ectoparasites species are themselves host to harmful pathogens that cause diseases like spotted fever and bubonic plague (Rantala, 2007), therefore natural selection would have preferred individuals with shorter hair leading to loss of the entire coat from the species. Although not all the hair was completely lost and not equally between males and female, hair was retained on the head, face, chest and pubic areas and with females losing more body hair than the males which is most likely due sexual selection. Although head and facial hair may have selective advantage of reducing exposure to the sun, they also seem to be linked to mate choice as the present of hair in these areas in males is display of strength of the individual’s immune system (Rantala, 2007); like the antlers of a stag so it was likely to have been controlled solely the female’s preferences. Whereas for the sexual

Get Access