Naked Crowd Essay

Rosen portrays our society as completely exposed, giving up all privacy to join, and fit in with the “naked crowd”. Rosen claims that we willing give up all power of privacy in order to fit in with society and be accepted as someone that can be trusted through exposure. He claims that image is the key to establishing trust, not through a relationship or conversation. His thesis presents his views on the subject, “has led us to value exposure over privacy? Why, in short, are we so eager to become members of the Naked Crowd, in which we have the illusion of belonging only when we are exposed?”(Rosen) he states that we value exposure over privacy, and will give away privacy to fit in.

Jeffery Rosen claims that every since the bombing attacks that took place on 9/11 has caused us to put our privacy up in exchange for acceptance and seems that people are more okay with it than they should be. According to Rosen, it already seems that privacy is already, in a state of advanced decay and every since 9/11 privacy has seemed to get thrown out of the window for a sense more of acceptance than for safety. Rosen thinks that "the naked machine" is partly what is to blame for this. He believes that the machine is unnecessary, absurd and humiliating. Within the article Rosen gives examples, instances, and even quotes people that have been a stooge to the naked machine. Another thing Rosen blames for this is the want for a connection

Social media is often praised for its ability to connect people worldwide, but in reality, it is forcing us further apart; we are no longer individuals but are instead creating for ourselves a fake social identity. Nicholas Carr, author of “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” focuses on how reading on the Internet has made it almost impossible for us to do “deep reading.” In “Just Between You, Me, and My 622 BFF’S,” Peggy Orenstein looks at how social media has stolen younger girl’s identities, and formed their sexual identity. Chuck Klosterman in his article “Electric Funeral” sees the Internet as a breeding ground for “villains” who feed off our primitive impulses to draw attention and fame to ourselves. These three authors have powerful

Advertisements surround every American; whether it be a TV commercial for car, or a billboard for a resort “10 miles ahead.” American society has adapted to a society that sends messages to gain trust in products based on how it is advertised. Similar to U.S.’ capitalist society, the political system has become dependent on advertisements to instill trust in the people for candidates. President Franklin D. Roosevelt built his presidency on informing the public on his political strategies through the use of public radio (Walsh). In the 1952 presidential race, Dwight Eisenhower promoted his campaign by creating political advertisements on TV (Fowler, Franz, Ridout). Since then, not only have radio and TV advertisements been a defining aspect of presidential elections, but also, social media, a more modern avenue for politicians. This has become one of the most effective campaigning strategies in modern day elections. President Obama’s 2008 presidential race is one of the most significant examples. Obama made history by taking advantage of the social media outlet and successfully reaching audiences who previously were not targeted by the previous standard tactics. Historically, Presidential candidates have gained dependence on using advertisements and social media to promote their platform and qualifications of becoming president. Today, there is an increasing necessity to master these campaign strategies in order to communicate effectively with the American citizens.

No longer do we live in an age where families socialize with one another face to face on a consistent basis with absolute privacy. In today’s society, technology has consumed most of our time leaving us zombified staring deep into the soul of a screen of some sort. In fact, you are doing just exactly that at this very moment. Privacy is no longer existent because little do people know, the screens they are staring into are staring right back. Our advancement in technology has without a doubt moved us a couple steps towards the world of Big Brother in the book 1984. However, we are still very distinct in the way in which we govern and use the data collected from our technology. .

America has become a society that more or less runs online. The Internet is where we do our shopping, our reading, where we interact with others, both socially and romantically, and where the average American spends a large amount of time. In 2013, it was reported that the average American adult would spend three hours a day on social media and networking sites talking to others and playing games (Staff, 2013). These sites know everything about us, our birthday, age, gender, political standing, what music we like, what stores we shop at. In this type of digital environment, nothing that is private remains so for long, especially for prominent figures, like celebrities, movie stars, and political figures. Congressman Anthony Weiner found this out not too long ago when one of his private messages was broadcast publicly via Twitter, creating a snowball effect that all but ended his Congressional career. We as a society like nothing better than a little bit of political scandal.

Schinke explains two scenarios: Kevin Hoffman’s love of Howard Stern went out on social media and Jessica Blinkered shared photos of her drinking with friends, only for police to arrest her for drunk driving and vehicular manslaughter (72-73). He concludes people, between ages 18 and 34, have become “comfortable” in the Internet world; as a result, they refuse to adhere to the consequences of giving “too much” information to the public (73). Moreover, Surveillance cameras, cell phones, and computer cookies can now track their movements and posts anywhere (73). Because young people have grown interest with technology, Schinke also relates their actions with celebrities. He quotes Emily Nussbaum’s post, “In essence, every young person in America has become, in the literal sense, a public figure” (73).

Privacy and the conflicts associated with it that citizens face are some of the most controversial topics in the world today. One of the main conflicts that citizens deal with is if the government is spying on us all the time and that if people feel that this it is an invasion of their privacy. Peter Singer evaluates on this topic of the good and bad of privacy in his essay, “Visible Man: Ethics in a World without Secrets”. He explains how technology has changed the way people think about privacy. People know and share all kinds of information about themselves through social media.

Proponents of this surveillance might ask, “If a person hasn’t done anything wrong, then why would they fear it?” However, one has to realize that, “this familiar claim ignores the fact that privacy is valuable not just to criminals, but to all of us” (Cole 2). When someone wishes to keep intimate information to him or herself, it is important for a civil society to respect those desires, regardless of any promise of nondisclosure. Doing this creates trust, further strengthening

In this day and age we have enormous amounts of information at our fingertips. While this accessibility is extremely convenient and useful, people often lose sight of what we forgo. In a media and information filled society, privacy is thrown straight out the window. People feel the need to share everything about themselves, as well as use social media to discover more about others. Through the texts of The Circle, The Truman Show and 1984, it is clearly evident that the increased use of technology and media presence leads to the loss of individual privacy.

The claim/thesis statement of this article is “ this creature is not who we wish to be – it’s a raw, unfiltered, brutally revealing version of ourselves, built onour dossiers of clicks, keystrokes, swipes, likes, transactions and check-ins, absent wahtever inner belief drove them. If a soul is who you are no matter what everybody else sees, this digital you is the opposite of a soul: It is all action and no intention”. The summary of this statement is that we are losing our privacy with the advance modern technology.

“If you want to keep a secret, you must first hide it from yourself.” In George Orwell’s “1984,” in order for your privacy to not be invaded not only do you need to hide things from people but from yourself as well. “1984” is a story about a dystopian society where people are watched and controlled by technology and are forced to believe what the Party and Big Brother want them to. The privacy issues in 1984 relating to the big idea of manipulation and control, are relevant in social media, video surveillance, and the ability to use propaganda to control our thoughts.

A story of a Korean student who refused to pick up after her dog then appears in the article. The story reveals that the student was harassed to the extent that she dropped out of college. Bennet then tells the story of how a Lewis and Clark University student was accused of rape on Facebook but what was not given a chance to properly represent themselves. The history of social stigma then gets touched on in the article. She then discusses how people publicly shamed each other in Ancient Rome and in colonial times. Jim Cohen an ethicist is then cited. Cohen’s quote reveals the internet lacks the law process of the United States, and anyone can fire at anyone without justified ground to stand on. Bennet further describes the internet as a place where people cannot be stopped. The article ends with the repercussions of internet videos. The number of lawsuits filed from different people are brought up along with how Raza needed therapy due to his shame. The article ends with a universal truth that what happens on the internet sticks with a person

Today, individuals are sacrificing privacy in order to feel safe. These sacrifices have made a significant impact on the current meaning of privacy, but may have greater consequences in the future. According to Debbie Kasper in her journal, “The Evolution (Or Devolution) of Privacy,” privacy is a struggling dilemma in America. Kasper asks, “If it is gone, when did it disappear, and why?”(Kasper 69). Our past generation has experienced the baby boom, and the world today is witnessing a technological boom. Technology is growing at an exponential rate, thus making information easier to access and share than ever before. The rapid diminishing of privacy is leaving Americans desperate for change.

Since the September 11th terrorist attack on the World Trade Center in 2001, the subject of terrorism has played a major role in both politics and media. As America embarked on the war on terrorism, the government became much more aware that threats to our country were both internal and external. In this age of technology it is now more possible than ever to discretely use surveillance software on the American people without them ever knowing, as evidenced by the Edward Snowden scandal in which it was revealed that the NSA had violated citizens’ personal privacy in the name of national security. This revelation led to a large debate