Nametag And Privacy

It is important to note that the main applications of biometrics are utilized for preventing fraud and ensuring security. The use of biometrics has increased tremendously but so has social, ethical, privacy, practical and even political issues associated with it (Duquenoy, Jones & Blundell, 2008). Following is the detail regarding its ethical and privacy issue implications.

Facial recognition is a technological product of the digital age that is continuing to evolve. The efficiency of the technology is an asset to crime detectives apprehending criminals, or the government tracking suspected terrorists for the safety of the country. It can also be used on a corporate level to allow a business to understand their ideal customer, or to increase the intractability of their website. While these abilities are positives to the people using them, the data collection may be harming more than it is helping. Considering the benefits of facial recognition, it is important for people to see what they are giving up for a more efficient experience. Facial recognition technology forces users to relinquish control of their own

The digital image of the face of a person can be matched against a record of other images by using face recognition software. In case that some of the images in the database go with the digitized image, the owner is reported about it by the system. Automatic face recognition has been studied and investigated extensively since 1990s and its usage is turning out to be no-nonsense in the present times. Although a number of automatic face recognition applications are relatively agreeable and harmless (access regulation to armaments, currency, illegal proof, nuclear equipment/supplies etc), there are still several dangers of face recognition systems that include violation of privacy and civil liberties, unrestrained exploitation, identity theft, illegal use of database, free access to personal data on social media etc. (Agre, 2001).

I concur with you on the use of biometrics by the government, and especially facial recognition to apprehend criminals. The recent rise in criminal cases can be halted if such a system is deployed. Biometrics can never go wrong and is in fact one of the most accurate ways of identifying people. If the government can be able to launch a system that can capture personal specifications, it can be really helpful.

Developed in the 1960s, facial recognition technology has been used by the government and companies to identify people by matching them to photos. The data for this software was originally entered manually, limiting the scope of use. By 2001, the novelty of more powerful facial recognition technology grasped the public’s attention. During the January 2001 Super Bowl, surveillance cameras captured images to find people with a criminal record (FBI 2013). This potential invasion of privacy under the pretense of public safety sparked a public debate about what private information the government was allowed to take from us. So should we be putting limitations on the use of facial recognition software in America in order to keep

It reasons that police cannot rely “solely” on facial recognition to make an arrest; however, this leaves a very dubious line regarding the extent of which they will rely on this software. Additionally, they argue that social media accounts will not be used in the database; however, they state that this will only be true during the pilot phase. This means that as the database becomes more widely used and exits the pilot phase, it will begin collecting more information about citizens not only in public, but also their personal lives and social media

To what extent should governments and companies be using biometric information obtained from facial recognition technology for surveillance and convenience in identifying individuals in society? This article discusses the legislature that must be implemented to protect our right to privacy. We will reach a conclusion by further analyzing the benefits and the risks of the new technology, evaluating the privacy issues that accompany, and discussing faults in the

Face recognition is another biometric technology. Face recognition uses the same technology that iris recognition uses. For face recognition, a camera takes several images of a person to find out who it is. Face recognition differs from all of the other biometric technologies because the person that is in the picture does not have to cooperate with the process. In all of the other technologies it requires the people to actively participate in the process. In face recognition, the image can be taken without the person even knowing that it took place.

The ability of humans to recognise and remember faces is remarkable. Interestingly, there seem to be many factors that influence the performance of facial recognition, such as age, gender, race and even particular social or cultural groups that people belong to.

Using the Digital discrimination system of the contours of the face by the passage of vehicles in the United States of America since the year 2008 in the detection of criminals who steal the identities of the others and use them to get new licenses for those who requested it.

Through this routine of advanced technology analysis, it has been established to increase the results and have hastened the procedure of identifying suspects of crimes. Facial recognition is also necessary for public involvement and observation as it also aids law enforcement officials to more easily zone in on possible suspects of a crimes being caught. With the use of facial recognition, it constantly has been proven quite an effective method with the incorporation of this technique.

“On the one hand he argued that privacy is an obsolete social norm, echoing the (then) CEO of Sun Microsystems who stated, ‘You have zero privacy anyway…. Get over it.’ On the other hand, Facebook has improved its privacy settings, for example, by allowing users to ‘untag’ themselves from posts.” (Etzioni) What this article is saying is that while our privacy is getting less protected, your basic information is still protected. You can untag yourself from photos, social media to some extent does care about your privacy. The reason being if you are not happy then you leave and they lose customers, which is the last thing that they

Bruce and Young’s theory of recognition tells us that human’s extract several kinds of information from faces; and that there are eight different components of such information. Such as structural encoding, expression analysis, facial speech analysis, directed visual processing, face recognition nodes,

Automatic face recognition has always been a major focus of research for a few decades, because of numerous practical applications where human identification is needed. Compared to other methods of identification (such as fingerprints, voice, footprint, or retina), face recognition has the advantage of its non-invasive and user friendly nature. Face images can be captured from a distance without interacting with the person, which is particularly beneficial for security and surveillance purposes. Furthermore, extra personal information, like gender, face expressions or age, can be obtained by further analyzing recognition results. Nowadays, face recognition technology has been widely applied to public security, person verification, Internet

Optic Nerve was used for experiments in automated facial recognition to monitor GCHQ’s existing targets, and to discover new targets of interest. These searches could be used to try to find terror suspects or criminals making use of multiple, anonymous user IDs. Instead of collecting webcam chats in entirety the programs saved one image every five minutes from the user’s feeds. Shockingly enough, one of the documents from the optic nerve program stated "Face detection has the potential to aid selection of useful images for 'mug shots' or even for face recognition by assessing the angle of the face” it reads, "The best images are ones where the person is facing the camera with their face upright."