Narcotic Officer Case Summary

Over the years, the nature of policing has changed and developed drastically. Their role not only entails crime fighting and emergency response, but also social enforcement and social peacekeeping. Bound by a code of ethics, this highly demanding role asks police to remain professional in their dealings with society, and ensure they uphold the law impartially and fairly. When it comes to enforcing the law, it is important to look at the methods and approaches taken by police in order to combat crime, and whether or not they meet current ethical standards. Although this may be the case, it is also important to acknowledge that aspects of police culture such as loyalty, deception and protection of colleagues will ultimately shape the nature of approach to resolving crime, gaining helpful information and protecting fellow officers. Police officers are granted large amounts of discretion within their roles, however, when officers deliberately abuse this amount of discretion and become display misconduct, it becomes challenging to limit discretionary authority of police officers because of the frequent circumstances they encounter where deception may provide highly constructive outcomes. Throughout this essay, methods used by police officers including entrapment, wiretapping and planting of evidence will be assessed for their strengths and weaknesses. Furthermore, the ethical standards of these methods and approaches will be assessed as to whether or not they prove as ethically

In order to slow the skyrocketing crime rate and protect its citizens, New York City officials made it a priority to establish new ways of policing. The first major initiative of this new strategy shift was to deploy more narcotic teams in the most

I was extremely excited about participating in the Criminal Litigation Clinic at the Philadelphia Defenders Association. Not only have I conducted Preliminary Hearings this fall, I will also be developing reports for clients in mitigation. However, my excitement quickly turned into frustration. My first Preliminary Hearing client was a 43-year-old Hispanic male who had been arrested and charged with possession (alleged heroin) and possession with the intent to deliver alleged heroin. Although the field test ruled the drug inconclusive, the seizure analysts revealed that the alleged heroin was actually Fentanyl. In the courtroom, particularly in Philadelphia, Fentanyl is considered worst than heroin because it has an alarming rate of overdose deaths. In some jurisdictions, when a user dies as a result of Fentanyl, authorizes will trace the Fentanyl purchase back to the seller and proceed to charge the seller with manslaughter.

Corruption within the New York Police Department is a quickly growing phenomenon; to an extent, this is largely due to the cop culture that encourages silence and draws the line at honesty. The good, honest officers are afraid to speak up against co-workers and in the process become corrupt themselves. When police departments were first established in the mid-nineteenth century, corruption quickly followed suit. It began with minor acts of misconduct and today deals with serious criminal activities. Scholars have noted that there is a strong correlation between the officers taking part in corrupt acts and officers wanting to fit in with the culture. In this paper, I argue that the deeper an officer in the New York police department gets into the police culture, the more likely it is that they become involved in narcotic corruption

In some of the high pressure situations the Narcotics team was involved with, the suspects opened up mostly to the ones that showed compassion, with the assumption that the presumably nice person would hopefully protect them. The goal of the team was to get the suspect to be cooperative. Homeland Security told the suspects that if they had nothing to hide, they did not need protection, and many of the suspects took the bait. They tried to obtain and secure information, ask questions, and have a purposeful conversation. The interrogator must have a basic knowledge of human personality and psychology in order to persuade effectively, for it depends on the person being questioned (Meissner et al., 2012). On several occasions, the Homeland

The Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) raided Dr. Murray’s practices, home and personal technical devices looking for evidence that tied him to the killing of Jackson. With a search warrant the DEA specifically were looking for the medical records of Jackson. In doing that, they found out Dr. Murray owed more than 780,000 dollars from other clients that he previously treated. In addition to that, they discovered he also unpaid payments on his mortgage, child support and credit card. In the court of law juries might believe Murray’s motive for being Jackson’s personal physician was to eventually get rid of his debt. The DEA also found eight hundred and three dollars were spent on drugs by Murray in Las Vegas, which was later shipped to Los Angeles

During the current week's Branch Scenario gave in Unit 1, we experienced a circumstance which happens pretty regularly inside of the police division. The situation begins off with me starting another position conceded to me as an opiates analyst doled out to an area with a widespread medication issue. At the first instructions performed, the squad administrator demands that the unit's "remarkable" strategies were helping in the declining rate of road law violations and murders. After the instructions, I get some information about the past comment made about the new strategies utilized supporting as a part of the diminished rates. My accomplice clarifies that sometimes, the unit must plant confirmation to capture top-level merchants and utilization

The summarized facts are that Oakes challenged the constitutional validity of Section 8 of the Narcotic Control Act, which contains that, if established to have possessed narcotics, the accused is presumed guilty and convicted of possession for trafficking purposes, unless they can substantiate innocence. By presuming the accused’s guilt and placing on the accused the burden to establish innocence, Oakes argued and the Ontario Court of Appeal agreed that Section 8 violates Section 11 (d) of the Charter: the right to the presumption of innocence. The Crown appealed to Supreme Court of Canada with the specified constitutional question being whether Section 8 violated Section 11 (d), and so did not have legal force or effect. If there was a violation,

Many police departments are facing budget problems, forcing them to cut their police force down. Many officers are being asked to do things they normally don't do such as patrolling. Police departments are also facing increasing crimes due to the poor economy. More people are engaging in criminal activities. Local and small agencies interact with the communities that they patrol on a daily basis. Sharing information between agencies are important not only for Home Land Security but for the public’s

Police officers and detectives play vital roles in the detection, investigation, and solving of crimes. In order to effectively solve a crime, it is imperative that a series of procedural steps occur. It is extremely crucial that the steps be completed in the proper order, never taking any time-saving methods or skipping of steps. Furthermore, if steps in the investigation process are skipped or not executed properly, your case has just been compromised, resulting in the possibility of an inaccurate verdict or mistrial. Although each crime scene investigation has identical stages or steps required during the investigation process that need to be completed, the nature of the crime and evidence gathered will likely differ, resulting in the

In this case, narcotics detective Damacio Diaz, from the Bakersfield police department found himself in contact with an informant who had about $15,000 in his shorts (Winton, 2016). When the informant left, he found just under $1,00 in the passenger-side door pocket (Winton, 2016). The informant told the police officer to take his wife out on a date or buy his kinds something. This action was the beginning of a police corruption scandal which involved cash, drugs, and protection (Winton, 2016). Diaz’s partner also confessed to ripping off drug dealers during traffic stops.

On December 30, 2016 at approximately 6:28 PM I, Deputy Bowring, was dispatched to 171 Private Road 5896 Yantis, Tx regarding a theft of a narcotic prescription.

The law enforcement agent, that represents government, bears the heavy responsibility of maintaining, in his own conduct and the honor and integrity of all government institutions. He, consequently, shall guard against placing himself in a position in which any person can expect special consideration or in which the public can reasonably assume that this special consideration is being given. Accordingly, he should be firm in refusing any type of gifts, favors,

We hear the word Narcotic and most everyone knows this means a mind altering drug of some type but it is what we do not know that can hurt us. The Merriam-Webster online dictionary tells us that a Narcotic is the following: “1a: a drug (as opium or morphine) that in moderate doses dulls the senses, relieves pain, and induces profound sleep but in excessive doses causes stupor, coma, or convulsions b: a drug (as marijuana or LSD) subject to restriction similar to that of addictive narcotics whether physiologically addictive and narcotic or not 2: something that soothes, relieves, or lulls”. The

Suddenly, I heard a phone ring. The other officer behind the desk picked up the call, leaning back in his chair. "What is it? ... Wait, what? ...Yes sir, she won 't be leaving." He looked over at me, his eyes half-closed from exhaustion. "Hey, you? Um, they said that there was an accident and they 're not going to let you leave. They 're going to ask you questions."