Narrative Essay: Troubleshoot Court

It may be very upsetting to get a traffic solution, especially if it's never happened for you before. Some people don't take getting the traffic citation or even ticket seriously when for his or her own good they should. Getting a traffic ticket isn't always a easy or small issue. Going ahead as well as paying the ticket doesn't bring an end into it. The Department of Cars (DMV) sees fit to put points on your license for practically just about all traffic infractions, end up being they small, moderate or large. This really is where a traffic attorney could be of help for you.

One piece of evidence that help to prove his innocence is the woman who lives across the street and wears glasses. The women who live across the street has testified against the boy, saying that she saw him kill his father through the window of her apartment and the last two windows of an El train. Now it was proved that you can see through windows of the El train at night. However, the woman wears glasses, one of the jurors wears glasses and he can’t even see the clock that is in the same room as him. Now it could be a chance that the woman is farsighted, but since it is known that no one sleeps with their glasses on. Her testimony has been debunked since there was no possible way she could have saw him kill his father all the way from across the street.

One piece of evidence that proves the boy’s innocence is the height of the father. This takes an effect on the evidence against the boy because he is 6 inches shorter than his father was. So it would have been harder for the boy to stab the dad it would of taking

When I had told my friends I couldn’t eat breakfast with them on Monday morning they gave me a puzzled look, as we always eat breakfast everyday together. After some confusion I had to tell them sorry I can’t, I have to go to court. I got even more confusion. They probably thought “Oh no what has she done or what happened?” but truth soon be told that I was going there just to watch some court cases. Upon telling them that it was just for an assignment, they all looked relieved that they hadn’t befriended a convict in their first 2 months of college.

The murder weapon, the knife was greatly debated in the court. The exceptionality of the knife was making the boy appear to be guilty of committing the hideous crime of murdering his own father. In order to prove this juror 8 managed to purchase a similar type of knife from the boy’s neighbourhood shop showing that it was not that unique. Juror 8 tells the jury that he doesn’t want them to accept his hypothesis but it could be a possibility. Upon seeing the exactly similar knife the other jurors are told about the undependability of the prosecution and their evidence. This incident clearly shows that juror 8 just doesn’t want to prove the boy’s innocence but he wants to put a reasonable doubt about the boy’s guilt in the minds of all the other jurors.

The prosecutor demonstrates that the knife is considered as "one-of-a-kind" and since the kid used the knife, there is to a lesser extent a chance that a similar knife was utilized. The kid expressed that the knife cut through his pocket and dropped out. Juror eight shows there was a possible path for the kid to lose the knife and that another person wounded his dad with an alternate knife. The other 11 members of the jury didn't trust Juror eight since they have chosen that the knife was distinctive and had significance. Later on, Juror eight stood up, reached into his pocket and took out a knife. At the point when Juror eight took out the knife, he demonstrated that the knife was exactly like the same knife the kid claimed that he had

The most persuasive pieces if evidence in this case for the defense was the fact that the women who claimed to have saw the boy stabbing his father did not have her glasses on. Other persuasive pieces of evidence for the defense were the fact that the old man could not have possibly gotten to the stairs to see the boy running down in time and the fact that one of the jurors was able to find the exact same switchblade. The most persuasive piece of evidence that the prosecution had was the fact that the man heard the 'boy' yell, "I'm going to kill you!”

Seven months later as Jasmine sat in the court room listening to Monica on the witness stand telling the room how Jasmine walked up to her drunken as she walked out of the her condo and told her how much she despised her and that her old ass need to be in a nursing home and not her neighbor and before she could say anything Jasmine hauled off and punched her in the face knocking her to the floor. Monica said that she was so scared that after she got up she hobbled into her apartment where she stayed until the police came. From that point on Monica said that she was so afraid for her life that she had to move after more run ins with Chrissy.

Hello judges, jurors, and everyone else present in this court room today. My name is Dr. Alyssa Diaz and I am an expert witness. I was called here to testify on this court case. Also I am here to inform you how examining a piece of hair from a suspect from a crime can help to find out who actually did commit the crime. There are some basic things that people should know about hair.

With a trial involving a murder suspect and possible death penalty verdict is something we can’t predict on how the jury is going to respond. We are all different in many ways and thinking is one of them. If we see an adult being accused for murder, we would pretty much in our brains say they have the right guy because of a crime so gruesome they can’t be wrong but that’s not always true. But if we see a young kid just like the buy in the movie we think innocent and that common. In the movie one of the jury me thinks he’s guilty because he’s a bad kid been out of juvie as a kid he must be the one who killed his own father even without looking at the evidence.

Magistrate Court is the lowest of DeKalb’s courts. If the court system was a hospital, Magistrate is triage. Most all criminal cases start here from stealing a candy bar to murder. We do not see cases all the way to the end.

A vote was cast and 11 men voted guilty and 1 men voted innocent. The deliberation then started and the case was argued because someone’s life was placed in their hands. Evidence was brought to the table such as the knife and there was an exact replicate of the “one of a kind” knife that was at the crime scene. The old man who lived in an apartment directly below the teenage boy said he saw the boy flee the crime scene in 15 second, evidence however proved that the old man could not have seen the boy flee the crime scene in 15 seconds as said. Additionally a woman across the street said she saw the young man stab his father with the knife however, logics proved that the woman was not wearing her glasses at the time of d murder which indicated that her eye sight was not 100%.

For my observation, I chose to observe a civil case that had to do with a divorce. I did some research on the cases, and chose one that was similar to an experience I went through. My parents are currently separated, and my father simply refused to pay child support. He lives outside of the state, so it was hard for my mother to have face to face confrontation with him. She got tired of raising three kids on her own, and finally decided to take him to court. I was required to serve as a witness. This took place in 2009, so I was thirteen years old and didn’t really understand much of what was going on. I timidly walked to the stand and was sworn in. I then answered the questions the attorney asked me.

The courts of the United Kingdom are institutions there are aim justice to all and deliver fair and equal trails. Although ‘fair and equal’ are not always true to some cases along with ‘justice to all’. Never the less either convicting someone for unlawful activity or resolving a civil dispute, the British legal system employs a variety of courts in its application of the law. It much reminds me of my home country the United States the different level of courts I mean. Magistrates courts have the jurisdiction to try minor offences then for more serious offences are referred to the Crown courts. There are also appellate courts, which include the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court; formally known as the House of Lords. To

Contempt is generally defined as an act of disobedience to an order of a court, or an act of disrespect of a court. A client's failure to comply with a restraining order, a visitation order or an injunction in any kind of action may result in a finding of contempt of court, no matter the intention.