National Neighborhood Watch Programs

“Community policing is, in essence, a collaboration between the police and the community that identifies and solves community problems” (U.S. Department of Justice, 1994, p. vii). Throughout the years, community policing has become a more popular strategy to help law enforcement officials control and deter crime; however, some areas across the United States has had problems in the past with communities and law enforcement working together to ensure a secure and safe environment. Although it is an officer’s duty to maintain order, keep the peace, and solve problems within the area he or she

Community policing helps citizens assume that the service of the police is there to take control of whichever the case may be when a situation happens. The community also needs to have some sort of equality with the police because the police and the community need each other to make the environment work. However, majority of the problem is that the community view police officers as abusing the law and although some officers do not all officers are bad. If the police and the community do try to work together then maybe the people can see that there are good officers and that it can change the way civilians see police officers. When it comes to the role of the police and taking care of their responsibilities the public needs to understand that.

In cities and towns across the country, tragic deaths of citizens in confrontations with police have have spiked a wave of distrust for law enforcement. The bad perception for law enforcement is unfair to the officer’s who are dedicated, and mean well in their duties, yet unfortunately, it has created tension between law enforcement agencies and the communities they serve. Due to the recent deaths and confrontations, reform proposals and new policies have been a national conversation to implement new initiatives to strengthen the bonds between law enforcement officers and the communities they serve. Although, confrontations between law enforcement and citizens in the community have spiked, the concept of community policing is not new. Throughout the years the philosophy of community policing has been to

The Community Policing era has been one of the contemporary police activities in the last 30 years. It is more of a decentralized approach to reducing crime by involving the same officer in the same community on a long term basis, so residents will develop trust and then provide information and assistance to the officer. Community Policing does not replace motorized patrol or other police tactics but instead compliments them with community partnership and problem solving (Bailey, 2011).

Law Enforcement officers have one of the most critical jobs in the United States. Their lives are always on the line and they are of high regards. This means they cannot fail! The results of their jobs do not only depend on their actions but also on the people. What this means is the community has a huge role when it comes to solving crime. Though many people may not believe it, they are the key to a successful crime prevention community. The people of the United States don’t really understand both the positive and negative effects that community policing actually brings. Some may say it is very dangerous based on their experiences. Others may say it’s the best way to do away with crime. Today the two will be compared and put to test by true officers serving our country. The facts will be stated and questions will be answered. Let’s take a look at what community policing is really all about!

Although many may find community policing and problem-oriented policing to fall in the same category, there is (surprisingly) a difference between the two. For one, community policing has many definitions. For some, it means instituting foot and bicycle patrols and doing acts pertaining to the ideal bond between police officers and their community. While for others it means maintaining order and cleaning up neighborhoods in desperate need of repair (Dunham & Alpert, 2005). However, an idyllic definition of community policing is altering the traditional definition of crime control to community problem-solving and promising to transform the way police do their job. Within the past two decades, there has been much research on community

As time passes and the increase of community relations puts police closer to the public resulted to police reforms to influence positive team building and policing to continue. Police and community relations made it possible to provide services to neighborhoods that may consisted of ethnic and cultural differences while at the same time develop the greater interaction and understanding between police and the community in providing public safety toward the resolution of neighborhood crimes. With the partnership of the communities, law enforcement became more focused, proactive and community sensitive leading into the breakdown of the barriers that separates the police from the public while at the same time provides training for police officers with a broader community service set of ideals.

Officers are more likely to receive valuable information about criminals and their activities based off their relationship with the community. By familiarizing with the community, the officers will gain trust and obtain reliable evaluation from the community on their expectation and needs of the police. Community policing reduces fear in the community making residents feel safe. It also welcomes the community to brainstorm about solutions that work in the neighborhood which gets everybody involved. (Pearson,

At the same time, in many respects the relationship between police and communities, especially the communites with high crime rates and police brutality. New law enforcement orientation had a profound impact on police–community relations. As crime control professionals , police began to simply view citizens as a means to information that would allow them to process criminal cases and return to service as quickly as possible. Meanwhile, crimes are constantly happening within the communities, there are alot of resources to assist offenders in doing

This program would be developed in a manner that the community can come and address the issues in their community with law enforcement, as well as get to know the officers patrolling their neighborhoods. This could show the community and the officers that there are no differences that can’t be solved with communication. A similar program has been used by the nearby department in San Jose. The program goal “is to help our residents learn about issues and challenges, share their ideas, and help propose collaborative solutions that can lead to long-term relationships between police officers and our community that are more trusting and productive for everyone.” (Newsroom,

Law enforcement must endeavor to keep programs such as citizens’ academies, town hall meetings and philosophies such as community oriented policing. Why? Because they maintain the pipeline to the public and they keep law enforcement in touch with the community. There is a need for more communication between law enforcement and community stakeholders. For the police to maintain the public’s trust in the face of negative incidents and changing demographics, the manner in which they convey their trustworthiness may have to change. To achieve real transparency its going to take more that technical gadgetry. Tracie Keesee, a police captain who is also the co-founder of RCLA’s Center for Policing Equity, suggest turning precinct houses into public spaces. “It might be adjoined with a rec center,” she says. “There could be wireless in the lobby, a room for community meetings, so that it’s not just that you come in when you’re handcuffed or making a report. (Bennett, D, 2014).”

In the wee hours of the night while everyone is asleep a burglar breaks into your home. Your next door neighbor is in a good position to call the local authorities to aid in your assistance. They are the ones would more than likely be able to see any intruders or any type of suspicious activity. It is slim to none that the police will catch this activity. This fact alone is what has made neighborhood watch programs so well-liked within the last couple decades. Due to participation in neighborhood watch programs the numbers has almost doubled over the past decade according to the crime survey that was taken in the UK. Regardless of the large number of neighborhood watch programs, there still has not been a drastic reduction in the crime rates. This poses the question: Are neighborhood watch programs that effective? In order to answer this, I have considered the history of this program, how these programs are meant to work and the social theory supporting neighborhood watch programs along with reviewing statistics regarding these programs.

There are multiple approaches to engaging a police force with the community in order to most effectively prevent and respond to crime, and considering the relative strengths and weakness of each of these strategic models will demonstrate how models can impact the operation of daily policing practices and activities. The model under discussion here is called community oriented policing (COP), and focuses on building relationships and rapport between officers and the community in order to more effectively prevent crime. It is augmented by a model called problem solving policing (PSP), and depends upon rank-and-file officers identifying community problem areas through direct observation and analysis. Each model excels at slightly different things, and in practice most police agencies deploy a mix of models. By examining the Miami-Dade Police Department's handbook for school resource officers, it will be possible to view a COP/PSP policy in action in order to better understand how these models practically affect policing.

They also, of course, respond to dispatch calls of crimes in progress. Crime prevention is achieved through mere police presence. Negative interaction between the community and police is generally the norm. In communities policing, on the other hand, police officers are typically assigned to specific geographic areas in their jurisdiction and establish ties with the various community groups. These groups may include ministerial (church) associations, neighborhood associations, youth groups, etc. The idea is that when police are involved with the community they are not viewed as outsiders who are there simply to enforce the law. Crime prevention is achieved through positive interaction with police and the community. The goals of community policing are to reduce crime and disorder, promote citizens’ quality of life in communities, reduce fear of crime, and improve police–citizen relations. These goals are achieved through three essential efforts: community engagement, problem solving, and organizational transformation. In other words, the police are the public and the public are the police.

Approaches of both community policing and traditional policing models differ in a variety of ways. The characteristics of the policing models are quite different from each other, and community based policing was considered laughable when suggested for the new approach in the early 1970s. Due to community policing’s new operating beliefs, new and unfamiliar expected officer behaviors, and that officers were being held legally responsible for their actions and inactions; the idea and implementation wasn’t widely accepted until 1980’s. Traditional policing was primarily dominated by rampant corruption and lawlessness that affected all levels of the police administration; therefore citizens had little trust if any, in the police officers of the time.