National Semiconductor 's Hybrid Incentive Plan

How this system works is employees are paid a standardized salary which entitles extra benefits and or bonuses on the side. The main focus of benefits is to focus on stability, health, wellness, and lifestyle. These benefits are there to make the employees life’s more comfortable and enjoyable, not necessarily cash incentives. However, there are cash incentives offered as-well. Incentives are the drivers of employee performance, as short term incentives are cash bonus based on performance, or rather long term incentives being stocks in the company you work for. How we will implement this is through transferring your average paycheck to a salary. Meaning a 40-hour work week at 11.40 is $456 a week before deductions. The math equates to a base salary of 21,888. From there employees will be able to receive benefits or incentives based upon work efficiency. We will have assigned goals to achieve by set deadlines to determine employee efficiency. All employees in this system are inclined to do more work at a more efficient rate since they are now being rewarded further than their salary or prior their hourly wage. This business function being salary based with incentives and bonuses will take a greater toll on management. Management will be deemed in charge of bonuses and benefits. It will be their responsibility to determine whether said employee deserves certain benefits or certain incentives based on their work efficiency. As management takes on a heavier role in the company it is better for the greater good and is a sacrifice they will have to be willing to

Their program is created to drive performance through a mixture of near-term finances, working goals and long-term focus on their stock price performance. The reliability in how the company achieves their compensation program and their objectives under that program has proven to be a significant influence. Their viewpoint remains to accentuate fairness within compensation as the most important element of the NEOs’ total program that supports our pay-for-performance purposes. (EXECUTIVE AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION, 2016)

Merit pay is a short-term, pay-for-performance plan, with a typical life span of three to four years, in which employers provide rewards, usually in terms of a raise for past performance, for employees who perform their jobs effectively, which will lead to higher performing employees which will in turn lead to a better work environment and higher overall productivity. The concept of merit pay is most often mentioned in the context of educational and/or government civil service reform. With a merit-based pay system, the employer pays, with the idea that the employer will reward more productive employees with merit increases. This concept came about in an attempt to sustain high performance levels in the workplace linking merit increases, or increases in base pay, to employee performance ratings, which are taken at the end of a performance year, usually by a direct supervisor. Due to the ever increasing changes of supply and demand in business, in order to remain feasible, the merit pay system is expected to change consistently with the needs presented to the companies, whether it be foreign competition, consumer demands, producer limitations, etc.

To foster competitiveness and deliver better results, there is a program called STACK where employees are ranked based on the work done and their incentive is decided based on it. Better the rank, better the incentives.

It also relates to growth while achieving goals, so the earn-out structure focuses rightly on performance goals. They could have also included some other qualitative goals.

Having buy-in from key stakeholders is crucial for the success of an incentive pay system. For example, if top management does not support such a program, lower-level managers will place little importance on effectively administering the program. Hence, a lack of top management support often leads to a lack of accountability. (Gordon, Kaswin)

1. To be honest, I think stretch goals are not appropriate because it will cause the companies staff/employees to be very overwhelmed, and eventually get burnt out from their positions. I recently read a article on stretch goals, it stated “the enormity of the problem causes people to freeze up, and the extrinsic motivator of money crowds out the intrinsic motivators of learning and growth.” I understand why this would be issues due to the fact that each worker could potential be avoiding the growth of their careers by focusing so hard on their stretch goals they are trying to reach. Though, I am siding with stretch goals not being appropriate I also want to address I do believe stretch goals could be possible in the right situation and/or

O’Neil (1998) suggests six minimal criteria for the design of a performance based pay system. The first of these criteria is that the reward system should be self-funding, that is, the performance increases should as a minimum offset the cost of the rewards provided. The second criterion is that the distribution of the rewards must be consistent, fair and justifiable. In addition reward plans must be transparent and clearly communicated. The third criterion

3)Financial incentives are designed to provide direct motivation – do this and you will get that while at the same time can spell doom. For Example giving a Psychiatrist a higher payment for

Reward and recognition programs must connect the needs and expectations of the workforce with the company’s overall goals and strategies. A program that reinforces important company values and goals will encourage employees to act in line with such goals and emphasize the importance of achieving these goals. Alternatively, rewards which do not connect with organizational goals may convey a misleading message and encourage employees to act in a manner that does not facilitate the

They are thinking of implement a strategic compensation plan as well as various other options that will allow its organization to focus on its strategic objectives and develop a comprehensive plan, considering base pay, short- and long-term incentives, benefits and growth opportunities. This kind of planning helps ensure that the compensation system will support the organization's long-and short-term objectives without overlap, which would have more than one pay plan driving the same objectives. The ultimate objective of this process is to ensure that the compensation system and other important facets attract and retain the desired employees and that it motivates them to do those things that support the business plan.

1. Incentive compensation is a major practice that has continually been adopted by healthcare organizations, especially for managers. Most of these organizations use this tool as a means of rewarding employees financial for outstanding performance. Generally, incentive compensation involves the use of monetary reward for managers to attain specific established goals. Therefore, incentive compensation can be a motivational tool that benefits health care managers and the entire organization because it enables managers to achieve greater compensation while promoting organizational productivity. As the Chief Executive Officer of a hospital, I would design an incentive compensation program for my management team by aligning the financial rewards with business objectives and people costs. This will involve the use of a comprehensive approach that examines basic pay, health benefits, incentive opportunities, and retirement programs. The alignment of the compensation program is geared towards promoting organizational productivity and employee motivation.

We believe the new incentive system was needed and reasonable because the accounting-based incentive system, where EPS was a measure of performance, raised valid concerns. The first being an agency problem. This existed within the old system as manager’s interests were not aligned with those of stockholders. EPS had improved steadily at a rate of 9% annually; however, the share price had increased only slightly in comparison. Therefore, the company’s stockholders had hardly benefited. The second issue was the use of subjectivity in granting bonus awards. These awards were given out even when their entity had not performed well. Managers began “politicking”, meaning they would try and convince their evaluators they performed better than the results had shown.

Instead of jumping to different achievement goals as problems arise, the visions and beliefs should have been determined first and that would help shape the overall goal of the company. While working towards goals such as profitability and growth, the visions and beliefs help keep employees in line and to some extent control the minimum expectations of the development of products, thus possibly lessen or avoid problems that did arise. The incentive scheme were not properly designed to take into account effects of employee actions and the impact it would have on the company as a whole and other stakeholders. It should some what reflect and reiterate these visions instead of promoting and motivating employees to be self interested in their own affairs and achieving the targets at “all costs”. All in all, there were minimal controls and checks in place, it was more of a one way push towards the goals and not looking back

Keeping employees motivated in addition to creating incentives and/or additional ways for employees to receive more compensation will create better performance overall within an organization. Contrary if company B gives their employees incentives to perform, without any motivational tactics they probably will not have as many top performances as company A, in addition the company may only seek short term rewards verses have long term success. Lack of motivation for employees within an organization, can cause long term damage for the company’s success. Different things motivate everyone; therefore there should be a system in place to keep employees motivated for the long term success of the company. In the MBM textbook under the concept of incentives, compensation, and motivation, there are a couple of different views of how it should be applied within an organization. We will discuss The Social Role of Profit, Personal Profit and Losses, and the way Market-Based Management view how incentives, compensation, and motivation should be applied and the things that effectively drive employees’ actions while at work.