Nationalism In The United States

The term nationalism refers to loyalty of an individual or a group to a nation. This term is primarily used when referring to a group which has extreme love for their own country but hatred for others; these people can go to any extent for the sake of protecting their country. Friedrich Nietzsche explained this as “In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule.”

The source intends to provide a controversial opinion in order to prevent people from blindly following leaders as well as to provide a statement warning of the acts of nationalism. While the views from the source are beneficial and introduce different views on the subject of nationalism—nationalism doesn’t start wars nor does it lead to blind obedience; greedy and power hungry people who decidedly hind behind the views of nationalism do. Nationalism is just a term that describes the desire for the prosperity of one’s country as well as patriotic feelings towards said country. Feelings of pride for a country do not evoke malicious intent the people who twist those ideas and cross the line into ultranationalism do. Leaders such as Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Hirohito, and Harry Truman use the word nationalism to persuade others to follow them by glamorizing the term and tricking people into agreeing with them. The Holocaust wasn’t caused due to

The concerns and perspective the source expresses, I feel are appropriate and consistent with the consequences that nationalism has caused over the course of history. Nationalism is a concept that must be approached with great caution, because if it is unmanaged it may grow into ultranationalism; and consequently cause an uprise of feelings of racism, stereotyping, and hatred towards other nations. Oftentimes, governments will control how their citizens think and act by withholding some information and adding other, simultaneously, governments glorify the fallen soldiers in order to manipulate citizens into fighting wars.

What is Patriotism? Well, different people have different opinions about what patriotism is. For instance, Adlai Stevenson believes that, “Patriotism is not a short and frenzied outburst of emotion but the tranquil and steady dedication of a lifetime.” But Charles de Gaulle believes that, “Patriotism is when love of your own people comes first.” You can see, Patriotism is a subject that can differ, but also coincide in definitions. Patriotism can be viewed almost everywhere, when school students perform the “Flag Salute”, or during the beginning of a football game when a person sings the national anthem as others remember fallen patriots, and salute the flag.

Nationalism can be understood as pride in one’s country. It is a spirit in which members of a country can be seen to care about their national identity. For example, many Americans exude national pride on the Fourth of July, the day of their country’s emancipation

Nationalism. The paste ties individuals together. A common feeling of society, of accomplishment, of goals or of qualities. Be that as it may, similar to any extensive social development, patriotism has its advantages and can likewise be a perilous weapon. It can be an effective instrument with which to join individuals under one pennant, a people going about as one who can be wielded in any heading that is seen fit.

The American’s had encountered a new surge of patriotic nationalism. Thomas Jefferson had restriction that generated the factories and cities that he had despised. The American’s had to defend for themselves the goods that they had imported from Europe. Europe had benefited the American farmers, they raised the prices of the American exports. The cotton, tobacco, and rice that was grown in the south, came to be a part of about two thirds of the U.S. exports. The American economy had flooded with the inexpensive goods that was threatened to be undercut with the manufacturing sector, that was in the United States.

The term “nationalism,” without any context, typically brings to mind images of grandiose pageants and displays of patriotism, conflict between in-groups and out-groups, and general discord when the nationalist sentiment escalates into an all-out conflict, whether simply ideological or more physically violent. Nationalism, a term which often caries an undesirable connotation, is typically defined simply as an association or pride in one’s nation which includes a feeling of belonging and identity. Throughout history, this term has typically been applied in a derisive fashion to accuse a group of possessing the commonly-associated traits – ranging from jingoism and xenophobia, to ethnocentrism and racism – which many have come to associate with

Nationalism can be a unifying force, but it can also be a dis-unifying force. When kings or queens start an empire they take over different countries. When doing this, they take over countries or nations that have the same religion, language, culture, etc., but they also can take over nations that have a different religions, languages, cultures, etc. Nationalism can be a unifying force because it brings the people of the same religion, language, culture, etc. together. This unifies them, or makes them a bigger group of people that have the same thing in common. Nationalism can be a dis-unifying force because it forces people who don't have the same religion, culture, or language. This makes them angry because they don't have anything in common

Nationalism is more than just a dictionary definition or an arbitrary feeling that one has. It is a fundamental force that impacts the decisions and therefore the identity and well-being of every human ever to live on this earth. In its most rudimentary form it is defined as: a feeling of belonging based on commonality especially while pursuing sovereignty. Nationalism takes root in a variety of different circumstances and to varying degrees. So one can feel nationalism for many different ‘nations’. Nationalism is not just black and white, it is more a gradient or scale. The question is not: Do you feel the forces of nationalism? It is: What nation do you feel the forces of nationalism most strongly and are you willing to act on them? On one

Striving toward nationalism has been a perfidious pilgrimage that many nation have taken, yet few have succeeded. The uncertainty of nationalistic view are many and can be disastrous for any kind of nation. The source is all about how nationalism in spite of it being built out of good intention it still causes a rift on a nation. Nationalism is a patriotic feeling towards one’s country. The viewpoint of the source is that the author of the quotation is saying that nationalism lean towards war before achieving it. The perspective of the source is not against nationalism but what nationalism can bring to the world. The author if the source is talking about the unnecessary bloodshed just to achieve and prove nationalism does exist. One can argue

Folk songs, dances, and stories can be seen as reflective of the core of a particular group’s cultural history. Culture is a unifying force among individuals, which is a characteristic element of the nationalist movements during the nineteenth century. Nationalism was the idea that a people had their own specific identity that manifested itself especially in a common language and history, often leading to the desire for an independent political state. Ethnic minority groups and lower class individuals not always felt they had a stake in their nation’s political order, which made it imperative for “the survival and development of their language and culture [which] provided the thread, giving them a sense of their own heritage and identity.”27

The first source begins with a quote from Voltaire, more specifically an French Enlightenment philosopher. The quote puts forth the idea that in order for a nation to succeed or to be powerful they must do harm to all of those around them. The era of Enlightenment was a key portion of the world's history in regards to nationalism. Some could say that the very conception of nationalism occurred during this era. The philosophers from this time wished to promote the idea of a government ruled by the people and their interests, rather than from a monarchy. Urging many countries to overthrow this type of ruling. This idea helped to influence the new National Assembly with the French revolution, when they were overthrowing King Louis. In the

Nationalism can be defined in two dimensions. First, the feeling of having a sense of national identity. This “national identity” is often confronted with a dilemma as to how to draw the boundaries of what creates a nation. This pre-requisite often comes in the form of either similarities in origin, ethnicity, culture and willingness to partake in the membership of a “nation”. This is contrasted with the concept of “states” as states such as the Native American Iroqouis, whom although are a “nation” have no presiding political autonomy over themselves.

While nationalism can be a positive concept, there is a fine line between having pride in a patriotic sense and promoting violence for the purpose of creating a negative uprising. Negative nationalism, often a result of a