Nationalism In The United States

Nationalism has been extremely important and influential in shaping the modern world we see today, causing revolutions, rebellions and the constant reshaping of world maps continuing even today. Its appeal is something that I don’t believe will diminish in the future. Many theologians and political commentators alike agree that Nationalism has perhaps been one of the most prominent political ideologies of the modern world “No single political doctrine has played a more prominent role in shaping the face of the modern world than nationalism” 1, and doesn’t look like ceasing to be as influential anytime

“For every force, there is a counter force. For every negative there is a positive. For every action there is a reaction. For every cause there is an effect.” By Grace Speare. Nationalism can be defined as the sense of connectivity among the people in a specific group or a nation of people. Consequently, this sense grows as the people have more to group around through social, political, and economic conditions. Therefore, as one of these conditions change it will have a drastic effect on the development of nationalism. The changing conditions that shape nationalism can be summarized as social conditions which describes the living conditions of any social group ,however, social conditions are also the quality of life, the availability of welfare,

Internationalism is a unifying force that has the power to impact every nation in the world and allow for their common good to be apprehended. Through ideal internationalism, political life can be regulated at the global level to construct a more peaceful structure. It has the potential to affect people in both positive and negative ways. Overcoming the difficulties that comes from executing internationalism is one of the key aspects of nationalism, it is up to the governing bodies to conquer it or not.

There are many people supposing that nationalism is a progressive force in international relations. However, there is also much debate in academic materials which are identifying nationalism as a hindrance in achieving the possibilities presented by globalization, as well as a risk factor in war. Therefore, there is a division in terms of if nationalism is progressive or regressive, as far as international relations are concerned. As a response to these conflicting views, this paper will explore the relevant literature to support the thesis that nationalism is a progressive force in international relations.

When Americans think of nationalism, most conjecture visions of high-flying flags, soldiers returning from war, and a montage of red, white and blue. Some envision fireworks on the Fourth of July, or a hometown parade on Memorial Day. To many, the term “nationalism,” is just a synonym for “patriotism,” or the emotional allegiance one feels to his or her country. But in fact, nationalism carries a wholly different meaning, one that has earned a negative connotation especially over the past few centuries. Nationalism, at its simplest is the patriotic sentiment for a nation, or aggregate of people united by common descent, history, culture, or language, generally inhabiting a particular country or territory. Nationalism therefore implies the superiority of a homogenous group of people, whether it be by race, culture, language, etc. Over the years, nationalism has been used to justify, in some cases, the genocide of ethnic or religious groups that fail to fit the national mold of the majority faction. This justification has procured nationalism its unsavory historical connotation, which peaked in Europe during World War II and still remains healthy today in Africa and the Middle East.

Nationalism gave confidence to the citizens of the moral virtue of their nation, suggesting that it was fair, worthy and without blame.9 Having too much pride can be dangerous as it can cause a person to get blinded by the truth and for them to follow authority or their leader blindly because they believe in them. When one's loyalty and devotion is dedicated to their country, it unifies a country and brings them together, this is the importance of nationalism. However, it also creates competition and conflict between other nations as to who is more powerful and

The concept of nationalism is in essence an odd organization that has had significant impacts in world history through shaping the political and social aspects of the society. As an important aspect in the development of the society, the concept of nationalism has basically been analyzed based on its impact on the emergence of nation-states across the globe. In most cases, these analyses have been conducted to determine the influence of nationalism on imperial breakdown i.e. the dissolution of empires. While the actual extent of the impact of nationalism on the imperial breakdown is uncertain, this concept has played a major role in the dissolution of empires. Generally, the transition to nationalism has contributed to significant effects in world history through shaping the political and social aspects of the society.

Nationalism has played a crucial role in world history over the past centuries. It continues to do so today. For many, nationalism is indelibly associated with some of the worst aspects of modern history, such as the destructive confidence of the Napoleon’s army and the murderous pride of Nazi Germany. Large numbers of people, descent in their hearts, have carried out unbelievable atrocities for no better reason than their nation required them to. Authoritarian and totalitarian regime have crushed dissent, eliminated opposition, and trampled on civil liberties in the name of the nation.

Today, the scourge of nationalism continues to infect humanity. Without doubt, in some circles, nationalism is hotly debated. For most people, however, the concept of nationalism is rarely questioned. In fact, it 's a foregone conclusion that people should love the nation in which they reside. Some people even take great pride in the fact that they were arbitrarily born in a specific geographical location. Unfortunately, like religion or capitalism, nationalism is alive and well in the 21st century.

SIn every nation or state in the modern world, there can be found some form or another of nationalism. At the most basic level nationalism is a modern concept used to describe the passion one feels for the nation they belong to and their willingness to defend it. Today, there are two types of nationalism that are heavily prevalent in nations across the globe as a way to unite the citizens with the common pride of nation. First, there is “rational” nationalism, which subscribes to the idea that a nation is legal-political community and all those who are born there or reside there are all citizens of said community and desire a common culture and religion to unite the people and give the nation political legitimacy. The other most common

Nationalism is a powerful force that can unite people working towards a common goal, but when it is taken to the extreme it can cause major disharmony in society, evident in the numerous genocides during the Age of Imperialism, the Fascist party's rise to power, and the Japanese’s unwillingness to surrender during World War II. Nationalism is dangerous, because it warps the minds of the individuals in the organization, creates prejudice and discrimination, and can be easily manipulated into a weapon against humanity.

Some may ask, “What is the difference between nationalism and imperialism?” Nationalism is a political, social, and economic system that is characterized by indorsing the interests of a nation, particularly with a goal of gaining and maintaining self-governance, or full sovereignty, over the group's fatherland (Webster 1). Whereas imperialism is the policy or practice, of spreading the power and territory of a nation by territorial acquisitions and by gaining indirect control over the political or economic life of other areas (Webster 1). Nationalism and Imperialism are two separate terms that are to be understood in different ways. Nationalism is based on

In many societies in America people fall into one of three categories, a nationalist, globalist, or hybrid. The nationalist is a person who tends to prioritize their own country over others on many world matters. The globalist is looking out for the betterment of the world at large, therefore, they have a world view. Then the hybrid who picks and chooses whatever seems best at the time. While nationalism seems like it will pay off at times a country will end up being either selfish or a bully to other countries. This will likely lead too few large world powers that don’t care about other countries, unless the other country can provide benefit to them. Globalism, while sounding nice in theory, it will be difficult for it to be effective unless the entire world is on board and for many reasons that isn’t realistic. One of the reasons is that each person has a different culture, religion, or set of principles that they live by. If one country keeps giving while other countries only take, then the country giving will go bankrupt. At some point they won’t be able to give anymore and then chaos is bound to erupt. The hybrid in my opinion has the right idea, the idea is to be considerate without getting into other peoples ' business. I strongly feel the balance of mainly nationalism with the right amount of globalism will help us reach the most positive outcome on both a national and global level.

In many societies in america people fall into one of three categories, a nationalist, globalist, or hybrid. The nationalist is a person who tends to prioritize their own country over others on many world matters. The globalist is looking out for the betterment of the world at large, therefore, they have a world view. Then the hybrid who picks and chooses whatever seems best at the time. While nationalism seems like it will pay off at times a country will end up being either selfish or a bully to other countries. This will likely lead too few large world powers that don’t care about other countries, unless the other country can provide benefit to them. Globalism, while sounding nice in theory, it will be difficult for it to be effective unless the entire world is on board and for many reasons that isn’t realistic. One of the reasons is that each person has a different culture, religion, or set of principles that they live by. If one country keeps giving while other countries only take, then the country giving will go bankrupt. At some point they won’t be able to give anymore and then chaos is bound to erupt. The hybrid in my opinion has the right idea, the idea is to be considerate without getting into other people business. I strongly feel the balance of mainly nationalism with the right amount of globalism will help us reach the most positive outcome on both a national and global level.

It is difficult to identify one’s nationality because understanding the concept of a nation is an abstruse procedure. Given that defining a nation is perplexing, and the characterization of a nation is imperative to define nationalism, it becomes a convoluted process to determine the meaning of nationalism. Furthermore, nationalism is a human construct, which makes it inconsistent across the world. Different individuals would have different views on the definition of nationalism. When the concept of nationalism is indefinite and obscure, it would inevitably lead to conflict amongst individuals within a nation and foreign to the nation due to a difference in opinion