In a planet covered with no natural objects, just a pure man-made Earth of the year 2127, exists a society that's not a single similar to the Earth of 2017. The population of human beings are divided into three sub-groups. Natural Born Humans are those who were born alive through the capability of reproduction of Natural Born Human beings as well. They are the rarest kinds of stimulus in the population covering just a 10% of the whole. Second are the Clones, or the human beings that weren't produced through the natural capability of a person to reproduce. They were those who stayed inside a capsule until fully developed into a human being. They were mortal as a natural human being is and they cover 40% of the population. Lastly, the Cyborgs. Often called as the metal beings rather than human beings, Cyborgs are those who were produced by combining all the products of high technology in able to create a fully operational Human being capable of thinking individually, and acting like a normal human does. Covering half of the population, Cyborgs were the ones dominating the society through ruling the government. …show more content…
Unlike how most people view them as pure metals, Cyborgs are actually covered in a thick layer of Skin-like Plastic with silk and linen underneath it. Perfect-looking humans that you couldn't even identify which is Natural and which is a Cyborg. Nonetheless, Cyborgs are separated into two classifications. The Military Cyborgs are those who fight for dominance and governance. They are cruel and unjust, being feared by all types of human being and they were controlled by the cruel government being reigned by an evil Cyborg producer. Contradicting to it, The Social Cyborgs were programmed to be friendly and kind to all kinds of human beings. They were befriended by many and they help the
2) The concept of descent with modification, or evolution, has a great deal of evidence in its support. Indicate the major types of evidence.
Have you ever heard the phrase nature vs nurture, well If you haven't you're about to. The nature vs nurture debate is a very complex debate that has been around for along time, scientist have also done many studies to find out which is has more effect on a person. Nature is what makes you who you are and is part of you from when you are born and when you die. Nurture is how a person is raised and what a person learns from experiences, this can always change.
The living human population is 0.0105% the size of the initial total population and 0.001% of the current population, the corpse population is 110.1324% the size of the initial total population and 99.983% of the current population, and the zombie population is 0.0078% the size of the total initial population and 0.007% of the current population.
nurture is environmental factors, where nature is what a person is born with. Both of these are very important and it is actually quite hard to decide whcih is more important than the other. I did some research on this topic and found there are many debates. For this assigment i decided to say nurture is more important in a childs learning because if a teacher does not no whats going on at home they may jump to concolusions about the child. Nurture doesnt just mean home life either, its friends, neighboors, groups and children can become easily peerpresured into doing something they dont want to do which could lead bullying, and i believe it is our goal as future educators to provvent that from happing. that is why i sided on team nurture though
Throughout growing up, an individual is told they can do and become anything they want to as long as they put their mind to it. That is great for someone to understand, but despite knowing this philosophical viewpoint, people quickly learn that some individuals are better than others at certain activities. I’m sure throughout school you realized that some students comprehended skills quicker than others.
Ancient artifacts, for example, stone devices and fossils, including antiquated human skulls and teeth, give data to comprehension the origins of modern humans. Understanding the beginning (or starting points) of modern humans is one of the focal objectives of paleoanthropology, however it remains a troublesome objective to accomplish. A portion of this trouble identifies with issues of definitions. What do we mean by ‘modern human'? The is frequently utilized interchangeably with Homo sapiens. All living human populaces have a place with Homo sapiens. In any case, differing qualities is one of the signs of our species, and living human populaces are described by an extensive variety of anatomical and behavioral variety. Things being what they are, how does a researcher settle on a meaning of modernity that will incorporate each individual from our species at various times? For instance, one way to deal with testing models of modern human starting points is to distinguish where and when the earliest individuals from H. sapiens initially showed up. Nonetheless, issues emerge when attempting to perceive these individuals from our species.
Everybody likes to believe they’re different in their own way, and I partake in that belief. I am musically talented, And I believe that both nature and nurture work together in that part of my life because even though I was born with the talent my skills would not have grown without my environment.
What makes a person who they are? Some would say nature is everything, you can't change it because you were born that way. Some believe no matter what is in your DNA it is all how and in what environment you were raised. I like to believe it’s mostly nurture. Well it has been tested and proven that both have effects on us mentally and physically. In the video “The Responsive Brain” (2001) they ran test to show how humans and animals alike respond to being removed from their mother. They concluded that without the nurture of mothers these children had stunted growth,psychosocial dwarfism, it’s caused by extreme emotional deprivation or stress. These babies, human or animals, reacting so strongly to not having their mothers they stopped growing
Human characters and traits can be shaped by heredity or environmental factors; in other words, it can be the result of genes and or the result of life experiences. Genes play a big role in determining our physical appearances like heights and colors, but the important question is: do the same genes that determine our genotype, tendencies toward traits such as humor, violence, likes and dislikes, hyperactivity and homosexuality. This debate has been One of the biggest debates in psychology; It’s The nature-nurture controversy; heredity vs. environment. In mental development science, there is a solid suggestion that nature and nurture interact to produce every specific trait; no characteristic develops as an exclusive response to either nature
We are an innate species. We learn through experience. Throughout the lifespan we are inflicted with many choices. We are in control of many of those choices. We can freely choose between serval alternatives, to form rational decisions. Our decision either elicit good or adverse outcomes. We have learned through environmental and social perspectives of our biological indifference leading to inequality in thought and will. Because of our imperfection or imbalances, individuals stray from the norm, becoming deviant. To uphold community and societal integrity we the people formed a republic to balance our imperfections, ensuring equal treatment to all who live under its laws. “We the people of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessing of Liberty to ourselves and our Prosperity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America (Avalon Project - Constitution of the United States : Preamble. (n.d.). Retrieved November 26, 2016, from http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/preamble.asp).” The constitution provides us with a charter of rights set in place to protect us for individuals in higher power, or our neighbors. “With liberty and justice for all.” We are all entitled civil liberties that are occasionally violated by others. We are our worst barrier to being self-determined. Since the people
The biological topic of my choice is human evolution and natural selection. These topics ties into our class lectures because we have talked about evolution and Lamarck's and Darwin's logic. Lamarck's logic was based on the inheritance of acquired characteristics. He believed that organisms characteristics were inherited during our lifetime. We discussed Lamarck's logic in class, and we learned that Lamarck was not completely right. We also learned that Darwin used variation in the organism's traits with features in their environments, and he believed that within a population there can be a slight different in appearance and function. This article interested me because the article explains how a slight different in nose shaped can have a different
Human evolution is the biological and cultural development of humans. A human is any member of the species Homo sapiens, meaning "wise man." Since at least the Upper Paleolithic era, some 40,000 years ago, every human society has devised a creation myth to explain how humans came to be. Creation myths are based on cultural beliefs that have been adopted as a legitimate explanation by a society as to where we came from.
One of the most astonishing things on earth is the human body. They consist of many organs that work together to maintain the person alive. The humans body composition is complex, but what was the origin? How did we become who we are today? These are the questions that intrigued me, and allowed me to understand how the human body evolved over the years. By the examination of our ancestors, and our body we will understand how we look today.
I think that it is amazing that they found the fossils of a human that looks so different than anything they have found before and that existed not that long ago. I believe based on the evidence and the different articles that it is a new species. If that truly is the case, then that is amazing to even think about. There is dissimilarity within species; there are also discrete species. The term hominid is a member of the zoological family Hominidae. Hominidae incorporates all species instigating after the human/African ape familial divided, leading to and as well as all species of Australopithecus and Homo.
When people take a look at African history in general many topics and ideas come to mind. How the people of Africa lived, how they developed civilizations and cultures, and how their oral traditions came about are just a few examples. When I am trying to learn about different groups of people and different areas of the world I most likely start at the very beginning of their existence. Africa being the origin of man and the home for the majority of developments of early humans suggests that human evolution is an extremely import topic in African history today. Keeping this in mind it is obvious that if any elements from our African Civilizations class should be required taught in U.S. high schools, the origin of man