Essay on Naturalistic Observation

I sat next to six females and two males who were all sitting by themselves in the library. I encountered a variety of reactions but saw similarities in most of them. Just as I expected some subjects were on their phones others did not pay much if any attention to my presence but that is not to say that no reactions surprised me. The frequency of different reactions was low all eight subjects checked their phones or used it in some way and all expressed some form of awkwardness by glancing at me instead of making direct eye contact. Six of the eight kept to themselves and never fully acknowledge my presence except when they moved their belongings over closer to themselves after I sat down. There were three reactions that surprised me the most for they went against my initial expectations. After sitting next to a male subject he did what most subjects did, he moved his things and shifted around a bit in his seat but instead of continuing his work or going on his phone he instead got up and left. The two other reactions both came from female subjects at different times. First I went ahead and sat next to the girl and she looked at me and smiled, after a few glances and looking at her phone she began to talk to me and stopped doing her work. A couple of subjects after her also glanced over at me from time to time but they either went back to doing their work or remained on their

The topic studied in this naturalistic observational research study was called “pick me up.” The purpose of this study was to place a note card on the ground labeled “pick me up” and observe the type of person that picked the card up. The research question was “Which gender will pick up the card more and which gender will react more?” The researchers had three hypotheses: (1) More women will smile when reading the card than men, (2) More men than women will notice the card and continue walking, and (3) More men than women will notice the card.

Throughout this assignment, my perspective on the person I studied changed. I learned several things about their character and the behavior that they presented. This task showed me that by simply observing a person’s behavior, my perspective about them changes.

My observation locations are Starbucks and restaurant. I chose them as my observation location because those are the places where people normally talk, study, socialize and interact in a casual manner.

When it comes to nonverbal cues, eye behavior is arguably the strongest indicator for the way an individual

Naturalistic observation is a research technique involving the observation of people or objects in their natural environments to gather data. When performing a naturalistic observation, it is key for the researcher to remain unavowed to the subject, or the result of the data could be skewed. When conducting a naturalistic observation to study the exercise times of young adult males versus older adult males, a good place to make observations would be at a gym, a popular hiking trail, or in a populated city (ex: downtown Washington, D.C.) where there are large sidewalks and plenty of room for foot traffic. Next, determine the variables. The measurable variables would be determined by witnessing a subject perform some sort of exercise, or any act that raises the heart rate above its natural rhythm on purpose at different times of day (ex: bike riding, running or jogging, roller blading, weight lifting, swimming, etc.). A record is kept regarding the execution of the variables, and after spending a viable amount of time collecting data from the subjects, the results of the study can be concluded. A possible result of the study could be that it is more common for older adult males to exercise early in the morning, while it is more common for younger adult males to exercise late in the evening.

My experiment consisted of me asking strangers, on the streets of Downtown Grand Rapids, for directions to Rosa Park’s Circle, and invading their personal space. To start, I would approach a stranger; tell them that I am lost, and that I am in need of directions to the Rosa Park’s Circle. As strangers began giving directions to me, I inched closer and closer to them. In addition to invading their personal space, I also held intense eye contact with them, trying my best not to blink. The whole time, although it was difficult, I kept a straight face while I performed my experiment. To make sure that I gathered enough information, and a variety of results, I tested my

Forty young adults were observed at a gym located on a public university campus in the Southeastern United States. All participants observed were using a cross-trainer. Participants did not give consent to take part in the study. The behaviors observed in this naturalistic observation study are believed to reflect individual differences in participants’ perseverance, or their willingness to continue working toward a goal despite obstacles or setbacks. These behaviors were coded specifically as: MAN-SHORT, MAN-LONG, WOMAN-SHORT, and WOMAN-LONG. MAN-SHORT as coded when a male participant used the cross-trainer for less than 30 minutes. MAN-LONG was coded when a male participant used the cross-trainer for more than 30 minutes. WOMAN-SHORT was

The research method that would best be used in determining if infant care leads to an insecure attachment bond between children and their mothers during the first year of life and into the years of preschool would be systematic observations. The naturalistic observation would best suite the investigation. The reason behind this is because the experiment would be best tested in a natural environment. For this particular study I would use the modified experimental designs. Due to the fact that to test this experiment between infants and mothers testing the interaction between the two humans would be tested naturally. The children would not be treated differently, but rather just their behavior,

The reason I chose to conduct this study is due to something that hits close to home. I have four children, and I remember that the stages of adolescence for my three older kids were a time of difference. They all had their own individual problems and it was tough for me and it is something that my youngest daughter is currently going through right now. Her behavior has change tremendously, her actions are frustrating, and we can never both come to understand each other anymore. Everyone goes through early adolescence, but how each individual experiences it all differs from one another, so I figured I can do a research study that will help me understand what is going on in this shifting phase in her life. The research I have decided to begin

In the profession of Psychology, watching people, animals, possessions in an environment are called observation. Individuals who work in Psychology use three different methods to observe people called controlled, natural, and participant observation. (McLeod, 2015) In my opinion, controlled observation is the most accurate mothed to use when studying a subject, because professionals can control and account for different variables. In the following paragraphs, I will describe the behavior I wished to observe in my chosen laboratory, the results that I obtained, and I will have provided a detailed explanation of my observation method used.

Observation as an approach in a laboratory setting is instantiated quite specifically using the Laboratory Based Observation approach. A variation of single user observation is two-user observation where pairs of users are invited to work together and the above process is carried out on the pair. One of the 'users' in two-user observation may be a member of the design team, and this is particularly useful in situations where there may be an unstable prototype.

The "Point" of this observation, is to compile a naturalistic observational study, for example, the theory by 'Henley 1977. This observational study will assess participant's behaviour in connection to the NVC component of 'touch' start within public spots. The study will representable both gender, inside the last adolescent class. This experiment will analyze its finding with different hypothesis and theories.

Naturalistic observation is a great way to collect data and can be used in many studies. Naturalistic observation is focused on behavior that is documented in the participant’s natural environment. The key to this study is just simply observing the subject (Jackson, S. L. ,2014).

There are three basic methods a researchers uses to conduct research. The first method is the observational method which is when behavior is closely observed. Now there are two different categories when it comes to the observational method- naturalistic observation and laboratory observation. When doing naturalistic observation the researcher views the participants in their natural environment. Now when doing laboratory observations the participants are viewed in a lab. Researchers have more control in a laboratory. Laboratory observations are more meaningful than those obtained with naturalistic observations. The second method is the case study method which involves an in-depth study of an individual or a group of individuals. When doing the case study method it allows the researchers to investigate a topic in way more detail than might be possible if they were trying to work with a large number of research participants. The last method that researchers use is the survey method. When using the survey method questions are administered through interviews or questionnaires. Case studies allow a researcher to investigate a topic in far more detail than might be possible if they were trying to deal with a large number of research participants.