When trying to understand the concept of color blindness we first need to understand what the term means. It is a set of beliefs in which white individuals judge non-white individuals as if they were treated equally ignoring past racism (Scott p. 77). Individuals who use color blindness do so through four central frames usually used together. The four frames are abstract liberalism, naturalization, cultural racism, and minimization of racism. To understand how the four frames are sometimes used together we need to understand their meaning.
Abstract liberalism contains ideas associated with equal opportunity meaning individuals regard other individual as if they have the same choices as they do (Bonilla-Silva p.28). An example of abstract liberalism would be if we had a 100 meter swim and the white individual had a 20 to 50 meter head start over non-white individuals who have to run the whole 100 meters with multiple hurdles in
…show more content…
An example of naturalization is that a white individual may argue that individuals of the same color stick together like African Americans live or gravitating towards other African Americans (Scott p. 77). Cultural racism relies on culturally based arguments to explain the standing of certain minorities in our societies (Bonilla-Silva p.28). An example of Cultural racism would be saying white individuals have a college degree because they value their education more than non-white individuals do (Scott p. 77). As we can tell this example is not accurate because there is no statics to back it up. Minimization of racism propose that discrimination is no longer a central focus affecting minority’s life styles (Bonilla-Silva p.29). An example of Minimization of racism would be when an individual points out to another individual the reduced amount racisms since back in the day (Scott p.
Race has been an issue in North America for many years. Eduardo Bonilla-Silva discusses the new racism in his book, Racism without Racists. Bonilla-Silva classifies the new racial discrimination as color blind racism. Color blind racism is then structured under four frames (26). Color blind racism is believed to have lead to the segregation of the white race from other minorities called white habitus. Color blind racism and white habitus has affected many people, whom don’t even realize that they are, have been or will be affected.
In the film “White Like Me”, Tim Wise expresses that white privilege affects those people who have advantages from the privilege and the ones who suffer as a result. The film constantly conveys instances where society continuously expresses racial bias and as a result has entered into a period of color blindness. Color blindness can be defined as white people attempting to reject racism, and continue to remain oblivious to society’s racial inequality and white privilege. Most white people are ignorant, being that they believe black people are treated equally to them. They constantly bring up facts about post slavery and freedom, but are blind to the white superiority in our society.
The most important theme in this book was the trials and tribulations of racism because it was woven in every part of the plot, it contributed to the conflict and resolutions, and gave the story a connection to current events, helping the reader’s comprehension.
This chapter on the framework of the colorblind ideology seems to be the most concrete and logical chapter in the book. This chapter is very well put together, with examples that cover a wide variety of topics. He also illustrates the concept of the frameworks playing into one another very well. The premise of these four frameworks as an “impregnable yet elastic wall that barricades whites from the United States’ racial reality” makes perfect logical sense as an explanation for the “racism without racists” culture seen in the US (47). Changing attitudes towards race relations forced a change in the manifestation of racist ideologies.
Renowned equity and Sociology professor at University of Toronto, Sherene Razack defines cultural racism as not only a concept which negates biology and the judgement of people because of their color but as well reframing the prejudice in regards to cultural differences by using cultural difference as the demarcation, racism is evacuated (Ramachandran, 2009).
Color blindness refers to a society where there are no special rights, privileges, or importance attached to person’s race. This concept confirms the values of fair play and equal opportunity. Some appealing elements to this ideology are the reversal or removal of drama from social, economic, and political incorporations of minorities. For examples, no more racial slavery, exclusions, genocides, or invasions of cultural groups in the United States.
What is nativism and xenophobia and how are they being expressed in today’s society? (20 points)
The "White Fragility in the Workplace" video (with sarcasm) shows that the White people are hurt when making a racial claim, and/or when called to be "racist" ("the r-word"). I think this video relates well to "The Style of Color Blindness". The people in the study "avoids racist terminology and preserves its mythological nonracialism through semantic moves such as 'I am not a racist, but...' 'some of my best friends are …,' …". They choose to use diminutives (a little, a bit…), followed by a racial projection, and end with a statement where they are not being racial or not knowing (Bonilla-Silva, Chapter 4). Because they are very emotional about race talks,
Liberalism is a political doctrine founded on ideas of both liberty and equality in the United States and also around the World. Three concerns that Liberalism faces is the voting rights for minorities, support of everyone having the right of free speech, and the support for Government programs such as education, and ensuring that all children have a proper education. Liberalism is focused on accomplishing “equality of opportunity for all people.” Liberalists are a firm believer when it comes to their belief that all citizens are entitled to their basic prerequisites of life. They also believe that the environment should be taken care of no matter what you believe in.
The alternative to Color-blindness is multiculturalism and color-conscious ideologies. Acknowledging, highlighting, and celebrating racial differences are examples of what it means to be color consciousness and to accept multiculturalism. It means you recognize that each tradition has something valuable to offer. It means you are not afraid to see how others have suffered as a result of racial conflict or differences (Color-blind Ideology Is a Form of Racism, Williams). In this essay, I will address how Color-consciousness deconstructs the idea that Color-blindness is beneficial for minority actors.
Recently, there has been an ongoing debate regarding non-whites ability to achieve the “American Dream” as easily as their white counterparts. Some of these American citizens suffer from color blindness and use minimization to ignore racism. Usually, their evidence stems from the success of a small percent of the population and fails to take into account the remaining populace that suffers from racial injustices. Most of the American citizens that reject the presence of racism don’t have frequent contact with people of color or aren’t one of those targeted races. For example, an Italian girl in a white community might come in contact with someone of color once every other week. She wouldn’t be able to make an accurate personal statement about current race wars because she doesn’t interact with other races enough to know their situation. Generally, this form of color blindness convinces citizens that America is no longer racist and that minorities are holding grudges due to prior historical events. America is not in a post-racial state because citizens of color are still struggling against individual harassment, systemic discrimination, and hate-fueled white supremacist movements.
I had the opportunity to join a community event, Come to the Table: Learn and talk about poverty and racism, one in a series sponsored by Avondale Presbyterian Church located in the affluent Meyers Park area of Charlotte, North Carolina. Though I had previously planned and prepared to discuss the observed gender and racial differences between the Indian culture and ours, when I noticed this event was advertised as the topic Cultural Norms & Blind-Spots and I though it fit right in with week fifteen’s discussion regarding society’s ability to truly be colorblind, I quickly jumped at the opportunity to attend. Somewhat surprisingly, my eighteen year old son, visiting home for only the day from college, was eager to join me. We soon learned this event was not just a community gathering (we happened to be the only two non-members of the church in attendance), but a kick-off for their mission to partner with one of Charlotte’s public housing communities, less than two miles away. A large part of her introduction was reassuring the group that self-reflection is the perfect start to change.
In his article, Eduardo Bonilla-Silva validated that racism has not ended yet. Racism that was believed to have already ended has only immortalized and gave birth to a new trend of racism wherein color is no longer the basis of stereotyping. From what most whites assert that they no longer see colors but they see people, an abstract way of racism towards minorities evolved to make their grudges more concealed. Racists are expressing their prejudice using words that are masking preconceived opinion aimed towards minorities. Racism has evolved. For example, simply replacing the word black with “African American” in describing a black person is an example of color-blind racism. Racism is there, but cannot be detected easily. There are expressions, phrases or idiomatic words that still encapsulate racial prejudice casting minorities as lower leveled individuals who are not deserving of the same rights and privileges that whites people deserve. When addressing color blindness, there is always contradiction compared to the reality that is experienced in the United States on a daily basis as we see it through the news in particular. Color blindness is the new racism that has given many people (mostly whites) a diversion to continue practicing racial inequality to some extent. The problem is that color blindness does not go deep enough to face institutional practices in order to create and promote racial equality.
Liberalism on the other hand is a political philosophy which advocates freedom and equality. According to liberalists, everyone should have freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of thoughts or in short freedom of everything on personal level. Liberalists also believe in equality. They believe that no one is superior to others and everyone should have equal rights. They believe in equal rights for all genders and races. Liberalism also states that the government should not dictate people on what to do and how to do, and if someone does not want to follow the government’s orders, he or she must be having full liberty to do so. Apart from being a political and philosophical movement, liberalism also has economic theories. Liberals are strong proponents of a modified form of capitalism. They believe that government should have least control over the businesses.
When we look at today’s world, we no longer see the world our parent’s or grandparent’s see. Country borders have now ceased to define us.The time when a person’s culture could be defined as where they lived, who they associated with or how they looked, now no longer exist. Today, the foundations of our cultural identity seem to be laid by ourselves and defined however we want it to be. For some people, it is just accepted and nothing strikes them in their daily lives but there are others who ponder on this question: is our way of defining culture really the path we should continue to go down or should more be done by everyone to retain the cultures that have played a significant part in the evolution of the world. To truly find an answer,