Nature And Individuality In Fahrenheit 451 By Ray Bradbury

Individuality is feared because it is seen as a threat in a society expects all citizens to conform. Individuality is when a particular person is aware of what is happening around them, while conformity is when a person’s behavior is in accordance with socially accepted conventions or standards. In the book Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, characters in the book show the relationship between conformity and individuality because those who conform, follow society’s rules while individuals still conform in a way, but retain their individuality by showing that they are physically and mentally mindful of their actions.

If you are in a room where everyone else has something in common except for you, what do you do? Maybe pretend to share their ideas. Maybe leave the room. But generally there are very few who would face the negative attention that is created by situations such as this. No one ever wants to be the ‘odd man out.’ Yet, without controversy how can people grow to have established morals and motivation in life? This is exactly what Ray Bradbury was trying to explain in his novel, Fahrenheit 451. His main character, Guy Montag, starts as a government pawn, a fireman who had the job of burning books. He blends in to society until one day he meets a young girl, who for the first time in his life makes him ask ‘why.’ Through his struggle of finding

“We must all be alike. Not everyone born free and equal, as the Constitution says, but everyone made equal. Each man the image of every other; then all are happy, for there are no mountains to make them cower, to judge themselves against” (Bradbury, 55-56). Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 is set in a bleak dystopian future in which books are illegal, freethinking is considered taboo and dangerous, and entertainment like TV and racing cars is used to control the masses. In this government controlled society, where the public is brainwashed in order to create a seemingly perfect world, standing apart from the majority is frowned upon and regarded as a threat against society. Firemen no longer put out fires and save lives in this world, but instead destroy and burn all books, along with the houses in which they are hidden. If a person breaks the social contract by reading books, asking questions, or doing anything other than watching the “parlors” or listening to the “seashells”, that person could be arrested or killed in order to protect the integrity of the system. Individuality is viewed as rebelling against the conformity set by the government and is punished severely. This novel uses the juxtaposition of characters like Clarisse and Montag, who represent free thought and self-expression, and those who have completely succumbed to their environment, like Beatty and Mildred, to highlight the contrast between danger of conformity and the significance of individuality.

Montag's house was on fire. He ended up burning all to forget about his past for example his wife whom he never loved and never knew her. “Fire was the best for everything” Montag felt this because Fire was the only way out of everything, his feeling and thoughts. In this this Montag showed that he is “unhappy” with his life because of everything such as Clarisse’s death. Clarisse is a young lady who loves adventures and have new experiences she died on a car crash. She showed Montag the way of life and why it’s important to live every second of

“With rebellion, awareness is born,” quoted by Albert Camus. An act of rebellion can cause awareness and open people's eyes to horrendous acts. In the book Fahrenheit 451 written by Ray Bradbury, when Montag realizes that the government wasn’t being fair, he decided he needed to make the society aware. Montag knew a rebellion was the only way to show that the government was not treating citizens right. It is acceptable to rebel when it is believed that the government is being unfair to their citizens because citizens should have the right to freely speak their opinions. People shouldn’t be told what they can or can’t-do for pleasure and they should be able to express their uniqueness.

The average person in our society spends 7-8 hours a day(The Washington Post) using technology; that is stuff like television, video games, surfing the web, etc. Let that set in; that’s a long time. Our society procrastinates also is constantly distracted by technology like no other. We are practically glued to technology; before we become slaves of technology we must change that. The theme of technology in Fahrenheit 451 informs us that the overuse of technology makes people lazy/procrastinate, that technology will overpower people’s lives, and technology takes away from people’s education.

This study examines the issue of freedom of information in the story of literary oppression found in Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury. Bradbury presents the oppression of an authoritarian state that does not allow its citizens to reads books. Guy Montag is initially a servant of the state that requires him to locate and persecute members of the community that still collect books. In various cases, Bradbury defines the rights of certain citizens to rebel against Guy and the other “book burners”, which suggest liberation from tyranny and the freedom of information. Guy also becomes convenient that the policy to destroy books is a threat to civilization, and the rebellion allows him to change his views and to rebel against the government. More importantly, Clarisse’s role in inspiring Guy to revolt becomes a major catalyst for freeing the society from banning books that are deemed a threat to the social order. In essence, an analysis of freedom of information will be examined in this study of literary oppression found in Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451.

In the book Fahrenheit 451, written by Ray Bradbury, many of the characters are faced with difficult decisions. All of the characters in the book struggle and at times don’t know what to do. The novel explores a main idea of individuality versus conformity, and many of the characters struggle with one or the other, at times.

Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 is a display of how humans are relying more and more on technology for entertainment at the price of their ability for intellectual development. It is a novel about technological dystopia, often compared to other novels such as, George Orwell’s 1984 and Asimov Ender’s Game. Although today’s technology has not quite caught up with Bradbury’s expectations, the threat of having his vision of a dystrophic society is very realistic. He sees a futuristic society in which this submission of thought is highly valued. In Fahrenheit 451, Bradbury displays a futuristic utopian society where "the people did not read books, enjoy nature, spend time by themselves, think independently, or have meaningful conversations" (Mogen, Pg. 111).

The book Fahrenheit 451, written by Ray Bradbury, is about a man named Guy Montag who breaks away from societal norms after realizing how ugly they are. He begins as a fireman who’s job is to burns books and destroys the houses they’re kept in. After meeting a girl named Clarisse McClellan, a person who opens his eyes to different ways society can be, Montag starts to see the way people are being brainwashed in they’re community . Montag tries to show a different way life could be to his friends but they refuse to change. The growth of Montag is shown through the book as he breaks away from society and thinks for himself.

The analysis of Ray Bradbury 's dystopian novel, Fahrenheit 451, shows that literature as books, education and alike is abused and criminalized in the hero’s reality, who is Guy Montag. The novel’s setting is when new things seem to have totally replaced literature, fire fighters set flames instead of putting them out, the ownership of books is deserving of the law and to restrict the standard is to court demise. The oppression of literature through innovation and technology can be analyzed through various research from others, which can be connected to Fahrenheit 451, a novel that foretells an extremely exhibit struggle in our advanced society, and in addition recognize the presence of the conflict in the year when the book was published, 1951. Four diverse basic theories identify with the contention in Bradbury 's dystopian society. The first is ‘Knowledge versus Ignorance’, another is ‘Technology versus Reading ' by MIT innovation Review - "A perspective from Mara E. Vats.", next is the 'Sorts of Conflict in Literature ' by Katherine Docimo and the last is ‘technology supplanting books in education. ' These four hypotheses precisely mediate with each other yet vary to stress the conflict between Technology and Literature.

Conformity, one of the main factors preventing individuality in Fahrenheit 451. Strict rules can be useful at times, but they never allow for people to express themselves. In some cases, people are not even allowed to have opinions. This can prevent conflict, but it can also create people who know nothing. In Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451, conformity prevents free thought, eventful existence, and individuality.

For most of us, our lives are a routine. We wake up in the morning and go to sleep at night without being full aware of our surroundings. We rarely stop to think what is happening and what to make of everything. The problem with this is that it is necessary for the growth of ourselves and other to comprehend the things in our life. Fahrenheit 451 illustrates the better understanding of our world around us through experience.

Indubitably, throughout the text there is a change in Montag’s admiration for fire. At first, Montag has a great love for his occupation of being a fireman, whose

It’s very easy for someone to just sit back and accept everything in their life. In Fahrenheit 451, Montag becomes discontent with his life after meeting a girl, Clarisse, who showed him how he could live his life. Montag was fine sitting back and just accepting everything in his life before, such as burning books for a living, or having a room in his house with 3 walls of TVs. If society were to start to question things the way Montag did it would cause the biggest impact on the world because individuality would become more prominent and people would be discontent with the world they were living in, which would cause them to do contribute to society.