Nature And Nurture : Nature Nurture

In social psychology when nature or nurture is mentioned this always brings up arguments and debates. It said to be dated back to Victorian era and it’s a never ending battle (Maribeth Mabanag).They argued that one of either nature or nurture was responsible for how human turned out in life. This is something no scientists have been able to prove up to these modern times. Nature is said to be things that you are acquired your from parents and you are born with such as this like you eye colour, hair texture and your nose. It is said that whatever you are born with is responsible for how you develop in life. When they speak of nurture, this deal with the effect of the environment and how it helps develop a child’s life. However, certain human traits remain a biological mystery. These traits have been studied on the "outside" but whose "inside" origins remain unclear. Such "mysterious" traits can be anything like intelligence, athletic ability, skin tone and muscle mass. So all the assumptions and

In the "nature vs nurture" debate, nature refers to an individual's innate qualities (nativism). Nature is your genes. The physical and personality traits determined by your genes stay the same irrespective of where you were born and raised. Nature factors that trigger an individual to commit crime are influences by biological and family factors. The nature method suggests that individuals are born with qualities, abilities and characteristics that determine the kind of person that individual will become.

Numerous people, like Galton, have tried to find where these two terms separate in their means of influence, whereas for others “who used the terms, nurture was rarely, if ever, seen as separable from nature; instead, it was referred to as helping and assisting, or as responding to, nature; nurture was more of a verb than a noun.” (Plonka, 2016) Similar to many things in the world, ideas that state that something works solely by itself is harder to believe than if it were to work with another component of the world around it. Those who believe that nature and nurture work together in sync to influence an organism believe that they show “a crucial biological phenomenon of mutual influences of both hereditary and environmental factors in the trait formation.” (Plonka, 2016) Nature alone cannot determine a person alone, yet nurture only has limited influence as

Nature versus Nurture has been a prolonged debate since the beginning of modern science. The argument is whether our characteristics, personality and behavior are affected by the environment or heredity. The nature theory is that our genes and hereditary plays a factor on how we look to the different traits we have. On the other hand, the nurture theory is that the environment and our personal experiences has an impact on who we are. Therefore, both factors play a major role in determining why some people commit serious crimes or to study if an adopted child has more in common with their biological family or adopted family.

Nurture-only view how people are all the same at birth, and we are the product of our experiences. “Nature through nurture the environment- the womb or the world outside, it interacts continuously with biology to shape who we are and what we do” (Scully, 2016). The two dissimilar arguments of nature and nurture of human intelligence is a person’s intelligence is determined by genetics and a person’s intelligence is determined by the environment in, which a person is raised.

Nature versus nurture can be a discussion that discusses the reasons why a person may behave a certain way or perform tasks in a certain manner. You can look at someone actions and compare them to their parents or close relatives. Were they born with distinct traits that caused actions similar to their relatives, or were there actions or behaviors learned from some type of influence or environmental situation that they were raised in? Nature versus nurture can be debated but, describes why we behave the way we do or respond to a situation in a certain way.

In the topic of nature versus nurture, I believe it’sits more nature and nurture. One may be calm in personality from nature but have to be aggressive in order to survive in theretheir environment or the other way away. Many people have been born in to poverty but become very rich in money due to a drive that their parents didn’t have. In some cases a person will have successful parents like lawyers and doctors but become a black sheep. Neither of the two will define a person alone but together is what makes an

Psychology is apprehensive about the human behavior as being hereditary or learned. This is where nature and nurture come into place. An article written by McLeod, S.A (2007) tells us that “the basic assumption is that the characteristics of the human species as a whole are a product of evolution and that individual differences

One of the oldest arguments in the history of psychology is the nature versus nurture debate. Today we recognize that both nature and nurture play key roles in human development, but still do not know if we have developed largely due to nature or nurture.

Nurture conveys a different portrait. Experience is key for the nurture side of the debate. It is

Nature is to believe that at birth, you are born with your traits but they are not observable till later during maturation. "Nativists take the position that all or most behaviors and characteristics are the results of inheritance" (Cherry). For example, we inherit eye color, hair color, diseases, skin pigmentation, height, and weight from our parents. Nurture is to believe that an individual is shaped through influences of their environment and what they are exposed to. For example, if one is abusive to their spouse and or children, it is possible that the one being abusive was abused when they were younger. "Chomsky believed that language is learned through the use of an innate language acquisition device that all humans are born with" (McLeod 2007). It is argued that nature refers to all of the genes and hereditary factors that influence who we are such as our

Nature versus nurture is a popular discussion in this world. Inherited traits or life experiences are believed to play a greater role in shaping your personality, For example, committing crimes. Criminals have been studied in the past few years, to determine if their actions are inherited traits. This debate of nature versus nurture focuses on the relative contributions of genetic inheritance and environmental factors to human development.

I can conclude by saying that Nurture + nature = who we are today, since both of them play a very significant part

Whether raised by parents properly or heavily influenced by the environment, many people debate whether an individual is mostly influenced by genetics or influenced by their environment. A person’s environment can have multiple influences, but the genes passed down by parents play a huge role in developing how their offspring will turn out to be. Being unable to properly test whether certain characteristics of a person come from genetics or the influences of the environment makes this theory very difficult to understand, thus making the topic of nature vs. nurture extremely controversial. The debates always show that nature and nurture contrast but then there may be evidence that suggest that the two are linked and a person is actually an

My reflection of the justification to distinguish between nature and nurture is that nature deals