Nature Nurture Controversy

Explain the developmental controversy of nature vs. nurture. Be sure to provide an example to illustrate the point.

Discuss the nature-nurture debate in relation to the development of the individual (M1) & Evaluate how nature and nurture may affect the physical, intellectual, emotional and social development of two stages of the development of the individual (D1).

The nature-nurture controversy is an age-old dispute that has been debated since at least the time of Hippocrates (460-377 B.C.E). According to the nature stance, who we are as individuals, that is, our physical characteristics, personality, intelligence, and how we behave, is biologically inherited, now known through our genetics. Hippocrates for instance, posited that human behaviour was linked to our bodily fluids, which he referred to as humors. Four personality types were identified that were related to four humors: choleric, or yellow bile was associated with being hot-tempered; sanguine or blood to confidence;

Three things that I find interesting were nature verses nurture controversy because we as a human being always look at one side and make a huge deal of the stuff for example, negative behavior often credit to neighborhoods and environment. We do not see the nature affects the nurture and nurture affects the nature. Another one was genetic links because we do inherit certain gene from our parent for example, my mom is allergic to beef meat so as I and therefore, I’m unable to digest too. Next is outdoor play because playing has nothing to with vision especially when people believe watching TV constantly can dim our vision because many children in developing countries do not have access to television or internet and still got problems with

How is the nature vs nurture debate related to a consideration of the mental disorder, schizophrenia?

Development psychology refers to the human development of cognitive abilities and social relationships understanding development has its importance as it provides insight into human behaviour. Over the years, a vast number of developmental theories have been put forward aiming to offer insight into this matter. The debate as to whether development is driven by nature (evolutionary factors) or nurture (environmental factors) or a combination of both fundamentally divides theories in the field and beyond.

Nature v.s. Nurture is one of the strongest debates that raises strong arguments from different viewpoints. In this essay i will describe whether nature or nurture had an impact on who i am today in this society .

The controversy of nature vs nurture is how children develop in life. Nature is when we develop naturally without any human interference and, nurture is when are taught by humans. the Impact on developmental theories are nature theorist believe in biological explanations, while nurturing theorists believe in observation and age. Children can develop in continuity (continuous) we see that in the all ages the book gave an example of a 2-year-old has no individual friends that are continuously in all 2-year-olds. When a child turns 8 he or she has several friends this is discontinuity friends

Very Well Mind has explained the definitions and thought processes of scientists and biologists. Nature refers to all of the genes and hereditary factors that influence who we are—from our physical appearance to our personality characteristics. Nurture refers to all the environmental variables that impact who we are, including our early childhood experiences, how we were raised, our social relationships, and our surrounding culture. Biological variables have been seen as one of the biggest nurturing parts of children. However, some things happen naturally, no matter the influence coming from outside sources.

In our society there are many controversial topics that are discussed amongst many of us. Sociology reveals those topics and shines a light on them. Without sociology, we wouldn 't be able to decipher what we think is “common sense”, from actual facts and evidence. After carefully studying an abundance of data from things such as experiments, statistics, and the macro perspective of experiences, only then can we find what we think may be the truth. A specific example of a controversial sociological topic is the debate of nature v. nurture. This debate has been going on for a very long time, and it really depends on who you talk to about it. What nature v. nurture refers to is that you are either the person you are because of heredity, or you are who you are because of society and are thus, a product of your environment. People 's experiences and own personal findings affect how they see this particular subject matter. If you were to ask John Locke, he would tell you that “a child 's mind is a (blank slate). They become what they are taught to be.” (Thio) Now this probably makes sense to you, at least to some degree. But to others this doesn 't make sense at all. Some people, whether conscious or unconscious of it, will blame almost anything on heredity. Things like “You got that attitude from your mother.” or “Your father used to say that same thing when he was your age.” The question is, was it really passed down to you, or did you learn it? Things like this are the entire

On November 15, 1959, four members of the prosperous Clutter family were murdered for seemingly no reason. This led many people to come up with their own ideas of what happened that night. This debate may be answered by psychology. One question that psychologists have is whether people are controlled more by their nature-genetics-or nurture-how they were raised (Mcleod 1). This debate can be used to discuss the motive of murderers, and argue for or against the death penalty in their case. Richard ¨Dick¨ Hickock and Perry Edward Smith, the ¨Clutter Killers,¨ are a perfect example of the nature vs. nurture debate. Perry was more influenced by nurture, while Dick was more influenced by nature.

HUMANITIES CONTROLLED ASSESSMENT NATURE VS. NURTURE What is inborn and what is learned? There has been extensive debate between scholars in the field of psychology surrounding the Nature vs. Nurture issue. Both nature and nurture determine who we are and neither is solely independent of the other.

Nature Vs. Nurture could possibly be one of the world’s grandest debates. Is it possible that who were are and how we interact with the world are predetermined factors already ingrained within our DNA or do we learn and are molded by our surroundings into who our identities? This debate has been at the center of many of arguments throughout my life, I can be on either side of the metaphorical fence depending on the topic at hand but overall I don’t have a particular side, I very much like to straddle the fence in that nature and nurture are both defining factors upon who we are as individuals.

You got your dark brown hair from your father, and you got your looks from your mother. But where did you get your excitement for sports and your love for all animals? One’s physical characteristics lean more towards genes and heredity, but our genes are not talked about as much when behavior is the topic. This is how the nature versus nurture debate came about. Scientists who believe in the nature theory believe that people behave the way they do due to heredity and genes. On the other hand, nurture scientists believes behavior is taught and influenced by the environment and the surrounding people. Many say that behavior results from nature, while others believe in the opposite, the environment. Human development has been viewed as one of the most highly controversial topics in the world of psychology today, and this debate is nature versus nurture.

For more than a century, researchers and psychologists, such as Sir Francis Galton, Charles Darwin, Sigmund Freud and many others, have been trying to understand how people are transformed by their environment. Researchers have mainly argued whether it is in fact our environment or rather genetics, our biological pre-wiring, which has influenced human behavior. This concept ultimately facilitated what is now known as the Nature versus Nurture debate. The Nature aspect states that human behavior is predetermined by our inherited genes or is the product of our innate behavior. The Nurture side of the disagreement postulates that human behavior stems from acquired attributes through individual learning and experiences. Correspondingly, the Object Relations Theory in psychoanalytic psychology supports the position that a person’s natural environment (i.e. family, peers, acquaintances, society) forms human development. The Object Relations theory stresses that it is the relationships between people, more specially family, often between mother and child, that crafts the human psyche.