Nature Nurture Debate

Sexual orientation refers to the emotional, sexual, and romantic attraction to men, women, or both genders. It also refers to a person’s sense of identity based on those attractions. In the early years, to be labeled as a gay, lesbian, or bisexual was known to be a mental illness. In recent years, it has been determined that it is a normal aspect of sexuality. Determining how one has this specific trait is up in the air. With homosexuality growing, sexual orientation has been a major discussion in the world throughout the last decade. Some have argued that it has to do with genetics, and some say that it has to do with the environment. This is known as the long-term controversy of nature versus nurture. The controversy discusses which side of the argument affects our behavior, intelligence, development, and personality. Scientists have been investigating and experimenting to find the answer to this debate. There has not been evidence that says one side is 100% the answer.

The nature-nurture controversy is an age-old dispute that has been debated since at least the time of Hippocrates (460-377 B.C.E). According to the nature stance, who we are as individuals, that is, our physical characteristics, personality, intelligence, and how we behave, is biologically inherited, now known through our genetics. Hippocrates for instance, posited that human behaviour was linked to our bodily fluids, which he referred to as humors. Four personality types were identified that were related to four humors: choleric, or yellow bile was associated with being hot-tempered; sanguine or blood to confidence;

1) Use the example of feral children to construct an argument in the nature versus nurture debate.

Three things that I find interesting were nature verses nurture controversy because we as a human being always look at one side and make a huge deal of the stuff for example, negative behavior often credit to neighborhoods and environment. We do not see the nature affects the nurture and nurture affects the nature. Another one was genetic links because we do inherit certain gene from our parent for example, my mom is allergic to beef meat so as I and therefore, I’m unable to digest too. Next is outdoor play because playing has nothing to with vision especially when people believe watching TV constantly can dim our vision because many children in developing countries do not have access to television or internet and still got problems with

Human development is known as the most highly controversial topics in the world of psychology. The debate is known as nature vs. nurture. The controversy on nature vs. Nurture centers on the personality, behavior, intelligence, and feelings. This debate is over are they genetically inherited or environmentally earned. We are all known as innate creatures born

The debate of Nature vs. Nurture is almost as old as humans themselves. Science that mysterious language that allows to understand the world around us still can't give us a clear picture into our DNA. Are our personalities somehow linked to the chemicals in our brains or do we take after those who raise us?

On November 15, 1959, four members of the prosperous Clutter family were murdered for seemingly no reason. This led many people to come up with their own ideas of what happened that night. This debate may be answered by psychology. One question that psychologists have is whether people are controlled more by their nature-genetics-or nurture-how they were raised (Mcleod 1). This debate can be used to discuss the motive of murderers, and argue for or against the death penalty in their case. Richard ¨Dick¨ Hickock and Perry Edward Smith, the ¨Clutter Killers,¨ are a perfect example of the nature vs. nurture debate. Perry was more influenced by nurture, while Dick was more influenced by nature.

Many psychologists have been debating if the nature-nurture controversy contributes to intelligence. Some psychologists today approve that both genetic and environment plays a part in determining intelligence. Twin study method is studying identical and fraternal twins to discover the relative effects of inheritance and environment on a diversity of attributes. The best method to evaluate the relative contribution of heredity and environment is to examine identical twins who have been separated and raised apart. With the twin study method researchers, Bouchard have studied approximately 60 pairs of fraternal twins and 80 pairs of identical twins who were reared apart. Bouchard have found the heritability of IQ to be 0.60 to 0.70, which

The Nature versus Nurture issue (printed page 5, e-book) is one that I’ve always found intriguing because I can easily understand arguments on both sides. I often think about my older sister in comparison to myself, we are merely three years apart in age but we are almost complete opposites. I’m outspoken and assertive, she’s shy and submissive. I value hard work and doing things independently, she constantly needs and asks for help and validation and would just rather someone do things for her. We have certain physical traits that certainly show we share genetic material, we have the same one sided dimple when we smile and the same freaky long, dexterous monkey-toes. And obviously we were raised similarly, in the same house with the same

Nature Vs. Nurture could possibly be one of the world’s grandest debates. Is it possible that who were are and how we interact with the world are predetermined factors already ingrained within our DNA or do we learn and are molded by our surroundings into who our identities? This debate has been at the center of many of arguments throughout my life, I can be on either side of the metaphorical fence depending on the topic at hand but overall I don’t have a particular side, I very much like to straddle the fence in that nature and nurture are both defining factors upon who we are as individuals.

The nature versus nurture debate has been a widely argued philosophical topic for numerous decades in which people hold strongly contrasting opinions. Many believe that a person’s development is solely down to their inherited (genetics) characteristics and tendencies, however, the opposing side consider the environment where you grew up to have a long-lasting effect or influence.

People all have different views of child development so eventually there would  be debate of whether it is more affected by the biology or the environment as we say the Nature-nurture debate. Biology is the things that were given from birth such as musical talent or special abilities which can not be affected but to support and encourage. The Nurture part is more complicated as it is more of the child’s surroundings that affect the child’s interest and development - their society and their culture. As they grow, they are influenced by parents, teachers, peers, the community and the society. They started to build up their own values, beliefs and cultures. So this essay will mainly focus on the nurture part and two contemporary perspectives will

Obesity has become one of the biggest health threats to today’s society. Current research has surrounded the cause of the disease as they try to pinpoint the reason why individuals are gaining weight at an alarming rate. Rather than just nature and nurture, this debate has been long influenced by the culture in which it stands in. The combination of society, reflexes and learned behaviors have all influenced why this health crisis has remained so relevant in culture.

The nature versus nurture debate is issues that were going on long time within psychology. What is the nature versus nurture debate all about?

For more than a century, researchers and psychologists, such as Sir Francis Galton, Charles Darwin, Sigmund Freud and many others, have been trying to understand how people are transformed by their environment. Researchers have mainly argued whether it is in fact our environment or rather genetics, our biological pre-wiring, which has influenced human behavior. This concept ultimately facilitated what is now known as the Nature versus Nurture debate. The Nature aspect states that human behavior is predetermined by our inherited genes or is the product of our innate behavior. The Nurture side of the disagreement postulates that human behavior stems from acquired attributes through individual learning and experiences. Correspondingly, the Object Relations Theory in psychoanalytic psychology supports the position that a person’s natural environment (i.e. family, peers, acquaintances, society) forms human development. The Object Relations theory stresses that it is the relationships between people, more specially family, often between mother and child, that crafts the human psyche.