Nature Or Nurture Has A Greater Effect On The Development Of Children

The debate between nature versus nurture keeps coming out these years whenever people talk of children’s developmental issues. In the topic of bullying, there are both nature and nurture reasons to make a child acts aggressively. According to Klahr, Klump and Burt (2014), children’s antisocial behaviors are strongly affected by the environmental factors. These factors included negative parenting styles and parent-child relationships. In this way, if a child sees his or her parents act aggressively toward others, so it is predictable that the child is likely to bully his or her peers to some extent.

“You inherit your environment just as much as your genes.” (Rich, 2015) In 1869, the phrase “nature vs. nurture was coined by an English polymath named Francis Galton. There are two sides to this debate, each with their own pros and con’s. Nature is the side that argues that the DNA and genotype humans are born with determines who they are and what personality and traits they will have throughout their lifetime. Whereas the nurture side of the debate argues that humans are born with sponges as minds, and through interactions and experiences while we grow, the knowledge and understanding of life is gained and this is how our personalities are sculpted. Many people have studied this debate through multiple schools of thoughts; each with their own arguments to which side they believe prevails. Yet, to this day, there is no proof to say which side of the debate if correct. Based on the psychological, sociological, and epigenetic schools of though, it can be validated that when it comes to the nature vs. nurture debate, nurture will always prevail and remain most relevant.

The controversy on whether children develop their intellectual attributes based on their genetics or the environment they have been raised in has been a topic of debate over the past years between psychologists. It is known as “Nature versus Nurture” and has lead people to question how a child’s development is influenced. Research has shown that signs of nurture is more evident in the development of a person than nature is. The way we are raised and brought up can greatly be influenced by our environment and surroundings within our childhood and the personality and behaviours we develop.

Nature versus Nurture is the issue of the degree to which environment and heredity influence behavior and development. In this issue nature can be defined as, behaviors due to heredity. Which means behaviors are based on the genetic makeup of an individual and is an influence of the individuals' growth and development throughout life. On the other hand nurture are causes of behaviors that are environmental. Which means the influence is from, parents, siblings, family, friends and all other experiences to which the individual is exposed to.

One of the main, and most controversial topics discussed in a child’s development is, nature vs. nurture. Nature pertains to genetic influences that a child has inherited from their parents, such as traits, abilities, and capacities. For instance, what color eyes the child may have, how athletic they may be, and even their brain development. Whereas nurture, refers to the environment the child is raised in and how this shapes their behaviors. Such factors can include, the family’s socio-economic status, schooling, parental discipline, as well as whether the child is provided with enough resources. When it comes to nature or nurture having a stronger influence then the other, the answer is both, nature and nurture, influence the outcome of the child. This idea that both nature and nurture, play a part in how the child will develop, is known as the nature-nurture continuum.

Nature has a profound affect on human development for various reasons, however, nurture most significantly affects the people we become. In the video clip, a set of twins who had been separated for 20 years realized they were scarily very alike, for example, they used the same toothpaste, married someone with the same name, named their pets the same thing, and their lab testings were identical. There are a large amount of preferences and biological similarities that can be attributed to nature, but nurture has a greater affect on personality than nature. Babies respond to external stimuli that they are presented with which ultimately is one of the most significant factors that sculpt who someone grows up to become. There are three types of

In regards to temperament and the whole theory of nature vs. nurture, I think nurture plays the biggest role in the development of an individual. Our genes may determine our characteristics and what type of person we are, but it is our surroundings that can alter that and shape the way we function as people.

the nature versus nurture is concerned with the extent that particular aspects of behavior are a product of either inherited or acquired characteristics. Often, there is no definitive answer. Success, or lack of, is a combination of both genetics and upbringing. Often, there is no definitive answer. For the purpose of this paper, athletic ability will be explored with regards to this debate. while some evidence shows the impact of nutrition and training, the big question is whether or not genetics outweigh the impacts of environment. According to the secondary research collected, evidence tends to support genetics rather than environment. However, a balanced combination of predisposed genes and external factors are often the perfect formula for an elite athlete. Elite athleticism can be attributed to sport specific genes, body types and environmental influences. Here we see that it's what's on the inside that really counts.

To be honest I believe that nature and nurture are both contributing factors to your life and personality. For example in this quote. “The study, published in Nature Genetics, reviewed almost every twin study done in the last 50 years and found that 49% of the average variation for human traits and diseases were down to genetics, and the other 51% were due to environmental factors. When visiting the nature versus nurture debate, there is overwhelming evidence that both genetic and environmental factors can influence traits and diseases," said lead researcher Dr. Beben Benyamin, from the Queensland Brain Institute (QBI), in a statement. "The findings show that we need to look at ourselves outside of a view of nature versus nurture, and instead look at it as nature and nurture.” (IFLScience.) This study supports my argument by bringing things together instead of keeping them apart. One thing that we as humans do is always separate things so we can identify ourselves separately because it is easier to process. What we should be doing is try to study things as a whole first instead of separately the first time given the opportunity to do

Second of all, nature versus nurture is often discussed when talking about human development. Nature is the biological makeup of a person; for example, their sex, skin color, eye color, hair color, etc. Nurture is more of the social makeup which may include interactions with neighbors, family, friends, going to school, etc. Both of these terms play a huge role in a child’s development. It is pretty obvious that nurture

nurture can be correct, each person has their own opinion. More facts are being discovered on both sides each day to support either nature or nurture. I know from my point of view that both are very important but with the help of changing the environment, it could help change negative trait's in a personality. Either way we are all individual with no two personalities exactly identical. Both nature and nurture are important, yet it is all in how you perceive it. Each one impacts our personality in more ways than one. To conclude I say that overall the affect of nurture, environment plays a greater impact based on the evidence I gave above. We all gain genetic traits from our parents, but our environment and our availability to knowledge to handle those traits can affect the personality as

My view on nature vs Nurture is, nature is based on what others think of you and nature is what your inner circle thinks of you. That’s like someone trying to play with your intelligence, when the outside think they know about you but don’t know what’s really going on. Nature comes along from your inner circle people that knows a lot more about you probably notice more about yourself than you do. That’s like asking yourself where did my eye color come from did I get it from my mother or my father. But your physical features can be just as identical to either parent. When you think about you personality you get to wondering where that came from. Your personality doesn’t have to always come from you father or mother, it can come from the people

Nature and Nurture I believe are very curtial parts of development that can have a very big impact on a child. In a nonhuman study scientist observed animals with similar genetic backrounds in different enviroments to determine the effects of specific environmental stimulation. Often times Life experiences can change parts of DNA that switch individual genes from on to off, alterations can be passed to future generations. When studying twins many things can occur, if the set of twins is identicle they are likely to act the same behavior wise due to their enviornment factors. While faternal twins are most likely not to act like their sibling at all. Children who live with their adoptive parents are weaker in association due to a high association

Withstanding that, it is simply unreasonable to think that Nurture is more significant than Nature in someones development. Development requires Nature to work in conjunction to Nurture, which allows the genes (Nature) to express themselves within their circumstances (Nurture). A simple explanation is to look at textbooks that students study from as genes, providing information for a “genotype”. Whilst, it is up to the student to absorb the information in their own way to complete their knowledge. Henceforth, an expression of knowledge that possessed the same information (Nature/Heredity), but is different amongst many because of the circumstances (Nurture). Genes have three common ways of expressing themselves based on the situation: chemical reactions and a process called alternative splicing. Gene regulation occurs frequently to either increase or decrease the production of that specific gene to make it more or less active. The activity of a specific gene accompanied by certain experiences would then consequently influence a particular behaviour in that person. Dr. Michael Meaney conducted experiment using rats to observe how genetic regulation in correlation with environmental situations affects how the DNA in stress response genes is altered. Rats who received more care released less stress hormones in comparison to their attention deficient counterparts. This is very

Every day people are born, this results from the binding of two separate sets of genes, chromosomes, and DNA. From that day forward, human beings, with their unique chemistry, are bombarded with stimuli from their external worlds, so what happens next? Well the truth is, it's up for people to decide on their own. Every individual is like a sponge that wants to simply suck in all the information that the world provides for them. The way that the information is used is totally up to the person. Every person is different, that might seem obvious at first glance, but there is much more that contributes to the development of a person, and in the world of science it’s known as environment and biology, or in other words nature versus nurture. Psychologists