Nature vs. Nurture Even though some people just act a certain way because that is how they are, like my brother. He usually always acts rude because that is how he is. The person you are is determined by the people you hang out with, because I have personally done this before and it is not because I'm a liar it is because that is how they know me and I would act more jokingly or more passionate towards them because they are a different person, I have noticed things like this in my time on this earth. People can act differently around other people if you paid close enough attention to them, and As my grandfather always said, "You show me your friends I will tell you what type of person you are." and I believe him because if you do notice that …show more content…
For example in this quote. “Nature, or genetics, has been proven to be an important factor in the development of some mental health conditions, such as schizophrenia, bipolar, and major depression: Bipolar, for example, is four to six times more likely to develop when there is a family history of the condition. However, although the importance of genetic factors cannot be denied, the development of mental illness is not entirely genetic. Take identical twins, for example, They share genes, yet if one twin develops schizophrenia, the other twin only has a 50% chance of also developing the condition. This shows that nature, while it plays an important part, is not the only contributing factor.” (GoodTherapy.org) While at the same time nurture can be a contributing factor to nature which makes them correlate with each …show more content…
To be honest I believe that nature and nurture are both contributing factors to your life and personality. For example in this quote. “The study, published in Nature Genetics, reviewed almost every twin study done in the last 50 years and found that 49% of the average variation for human traits and diseases were down to genetics, and the other 51% were due to environmental factors. When visiting the nature versus nurture debate, there is overwhelming evidence that both genetic and environmental factors can influence traits and diseases," said lead researcher Dr. Beben Benyamin, from the Queensland Brain Institute (QBI), in a statement. "The findings show that we need to look at ourselves outside of a view of nature versus nurture, and instead look at it as nature and nurture.” (IFLScience.) This study supports my argument by bringing things together instead of keeping them apart. One thing that we as humans do is always separate things so we can identify ourselves separately because it is easier to process. What we should be doing is try to study things as a whole first instead of separately the first time given the opportunity to do
One of the oldest debates in the history of Psychology is about Nature versus Nurture. Today, we know that both play a significant role in human’s life. Some people believe that it is genes which affects our way of life and some people believes that it is none other but our environment that greatly influences our lifestyle and some believe that both has tremendous impact on one’s way of life. Indeed in certain cases both our nature (our genes) and our environment roughly play an equal role in human life.
The biggest controversy in psychology today is whether genetics or one’s environment plays a role in the behavior of the individual. Psychologists have researched and developed different theories to explain the reason for the way humans think and behave. The behavior of individuals is either inherited or learned. In my opinion, I believe that nurture plays a big role in the individual’s behavior. Kendra Cherry states, “Nurture refers to all the environmental variables that impact who we are, including our early childhood experiences, how we were raised, our social relationships, and our surrounding culture” (1). People have become who there are because of the environment they were exposed to in their childhood years. The behavior of people is influenced be the environment that surrounds them and can changed many times through one’s lifetime. People have different personalities a person’s
1. Some people have argued that the Johns Hopkins psychologist used this opportunity as an experiment to test his nurture theory of gender identity. What are the expected results of this experiment, assuming that the nurture theory is valid?
When we compare nature to nurture, we have to know what they mean. Nature is looking at the genetics, and the biological way you are made. Something you have usually have no control over. There have been some serial killers in
Nature or Nurture. Nature may be all of the genes and hereditary factors with which influence them to become who they are such as physical appearances and personality characteristics. Nurturing impacts people’s lives as well as how they are raised and all the environmental factors. In combination, these qualities can be the true identity of oneself. Many people may argue that nurture appears to a play huge factor in the two, but others may think otherwise. Not having both as a characteristic can have a negative effect on a person physically and mentally. The debate of nature versus nurture appears to be the oldest argument known to man, and it still remains to be unanswered. In the old-age argument nature versus nurture, nature may play a huge role in determining a person’s true identity.
The nature side of the argument is basically what we are born with, our heredity. The main idea of this is that we are born with predetermined traits that may or may not create psychopathic tendencies in us. Dr. Richard Davidson of the University of Wisconsin at Madison published a report in 2000 that compared brain scans of five
One of the oldest, most prominent topics of academic debate is the Nature vs. Nurture argument. Nature vs. Nurture is a largely psychological term, in which the Nature aspect places more significance on genetics and personality; our innate predisposition to various circumstances tell us a great deal more about who we are. On the other side, the Nurture aspect places more focus on our environment and stresses the salience of the majority of what we do in our daily lives have been “learned” We see a wide array of examples of this specific argument in literature, popular culture, and even in our everyday lives. While no one can deny that both sides have extremely valid points, it would be very naive to assume that one had more of a dominant factor;
Does the environment that one grows up in contribute to alcoholism or is alcoholism determined by genetics? It wasn’t until 1991 that alcoholism was considered both a medical and psychiatric disease by the American Medical Association. Alcoholism is defined in the dictionary as a chronic disorder characterized by dependence on alcohol, repeated excessive use of alcoholic beverages, the development of withdrawal symptoms on reducing or ceasing intake, morbidity that may include cirrhosis of the liver, and decreased ability to function socially and vocationally. (dictionary.com). It is also defined as an addiction to the consumption of alcoholic liquor or the mental illness
In society, not one person is alike. By saying this, many people believe that they strongly take after their parents. Meaning they think Nature is a big part in their life and why they are who they are. The genes in each cell in us humans determine the different traits that we have, more dominantly on the physical connections like eye color, hair color, ear size, height, and other traits. However, it is still not known whether the more abstract attributes like personality, intelligence, sexual orientation, likes and dislikes are gene-coded in our DNA. The nurture theory has experiments showing a child’s behavior with the environment as to adult behavior. In the Nature Vs Nurture debate, everyone has their own thoughts and ideas on each
I believe that nurture has a lot to do with the development of a human, but nature has a larger impact in determining personality traits and the make up of a person. A human is born with certain characteristics and even though their nurture may influence these characteristics to change or be enhanced, their genes have a large influence on how they will live their life.
nature as opposed to nurture.” said Neal Conan on a broadcast on Talk of the Nation. This is
nurture can be correct, each person has their own opinion. More facts are being discovered on both sides each day to support either nature or nurture. I know from my point of view that both are very important but with the help of changing the environment, it could help change negative trait's in a personality. Either way we are all individual with no two personalities exactly identical. Both nature and nurture are important, yet it is all in how you perceive it. Each one impacts our personality in more ways than one. To conclude I say that overall the affect of nurture, environment plays a greater impact based on the evidence I gave above. We all gain genetic traits from our parents, but our environment and our availability to knowledge to handle those traits can affect the personality as
The nature-nurture debate has been around for decades. It is one of the oldest and most popular topics in the history of psychology asking what makes people who they become and how they behave and develop the way they do. What makes the debate more interesting is that now scientists are asking if personality traits and even sexual orientation can be determined by what is in already there from conception. Bodies are built up of chromosomes which contain genetic information. Many of these are inherited from parents and relatives. The nature side of the debate states the way people are is predominantly from inherited genetics and other biological factors not so much the environmental factors. The genes humans have in their bodies play a huge role to many aspects of who they are and who they become. For example, hair colour, eye colour and height are all predetermined by genes. Unchangeable. This is natures way. The argument stands to decide whether most attributes do stem from nature, genes, or if they can be affected by the environment and the way people are nurtured as they have grown. The nurture side of the argument believes although humans do have the genes and traits with which they are born, most personality traits are being made up of environmental factors. For example, being loved and cared for as children, if parents or carers were positive role models and if those people were taught in ways which provided them with discipline and respect for others. Where nature
In the twentieth century, where we are now, there is also a different approach to the nature vs. nurture debate then there was before. In the twentieth century it has came to a realization that for this debate there is not going to be a yes or no or right or wrong answer. Many people believe different things. For example, there may be or there may not be a stable or valid human nature. There is a variety in what people believe. With nurture, depending on where an individual grows up, there may be a lot of different assumptions and practices. People in this century do not think nature and nurture are two completely separable things. They believe they work together and the intelligence is
The nature or genetics of a person are the raw basis that describes a person while the nurturing or environment of a situation is what shapes a person in to what they become. In my case of athletic ability, nature and nurture go hand in hand. The genetics of my parents helped shaped my raw athletic talents, but the environment that they created helped develop those talents in to what they are today. If it was not for the nurturing that they provided me, I may not have worked as hard and may not be as good of an athlete that I am. My academic success is also a product of my genetics with the development of my environment. It is proven that genetics play a very significant role in a person’s intelligence, but if it was not for my parents teaching me the importance of an education, I may have never pursued academic success like I do. The nature of a person gives them a raw intelligence, but if their environment does not teach them how to use or the importance of that intelligence, it may not develop