Nature Vs Nurture Essay

There has always been a controversial debate based on nature vs nurture. What makes a person who they are today? Is it the genetic or their biological make-up? Or is it their environment; based on how they were brought up, social groups, societies values/beliefs? This question has been an interesting point of discussion between psychologists. Serial killers have always been fascinating because, they have usually murdered more than 3 people, so what makes them a serial killer? In my opinion I think both aspects contribute to your personality and how you are now.

The historical debate regarding nature and nurture has been going on for years and is still unresolved. Many theorists believe what we have inherited and our genes, makes us the way we are and how we develop. Other theorists believe it is the way we are brought up and our experiences, that make us the way we are and how we develop.

Through history, the idea of nature vs. nurture has been a hotly debated issue. Nature, or genetics is often believed to be the most important aspect of a persons’ upbringing, as nature is something intrinsic to any one person. However, many debate that nurture, or the care and encouragement of any human life, trumps nature. The earliest evidence and rebuttals of these theories have been honed and developed over time by specific psychologists and educational theorists – all who hoped to prove their own ideas as fact at one time in history.

The issues pitting nature against nurture are exceptionally significant for the gamut of discoveries that attribute an increasing proportion of traits and behaviours to one's genetic makeup. The resulting variety of physical shortcomings and limitations in each person has, for centuries, been countered by endeavours to improve or interfere where necessary, and every individual is consequently the product of a delicate middle path of balance between the two.

From Dr. Money’s perspective, raising Bruce as a girl would allow him to live a “normal” life, if he were to live his life without a penis, he would be seen as an outsider and rejected from society. He also suggested to put Bruce on estrogen, but also surgically give him a cosmetic vagina. Dr. Money explained to Ron and Janet that Bruce/Brenda, would psychologically mature as a woman, and be attracted to men, as well as be able to have sexual intecourse, without a problem. According to Bruce’s parents, there was no reason “that it shouldn’t work” (50). However, they could have thought it out thoroughly, what if Brenda didn’t feel comfortable in her own skin? Would she feel as though something is wrong with her? This is where the topic of

In the nurture side of the debate we believe that genes have nothing to do with the child's behaviour and it is all in the choices the kid makes. I was told of a specific case in the Nature versus Nurture debate, in the studies a set of twins with an alcoholic mother that could care less about her children and a father that was hardly around. One twin grew up to be an amazing mother and go on a completely different path then he was taught when he was younger, the other twin followed exactly in the footsteps of his mother. By gathering this research we can conclude that it is all in the child’s choices and how that child would like to live the rest of his or her life.

Is one’s life set in stone right from birth? Or does an individual gain certain qualities through experiences in life? Nature versus nurture has always been a controversial debate, and there are many different theories and explanations that have been provided around the world, and although many of these statements are true, no one has come to an official conclusion that explains this psychological phenomenon. There have been hundreds of studies conducted in order to explain this topic, and the findings can help develop an understanding that can eventually define the truth. By analyzing certain cognitive traits in individuals it is possible to learn whether these certain traits are predisposed or if the environment one grows up in influence the appearance of the traits.

In society, not one person is alike. By saying this, many people believe that they strongly take after their parents. Meaning they think Nature is a big part in their life and why they are who they are. The genes in each cell in us humans determine the different traits that we have, more dominantly on the physical connections like eye color, hair color, ear size, height, and other traits. However, it is still not known whether the more abstract attributes like personality, intelligence, sexual orientation, likes and dislikes are gene-coded in our DNA. The nurture theory has experiments showing a child’s behavior with the environment as to adult behavior. In the Nature Vs Nurture debate, everyone has their own thoughts and ideas on each

In the last few weeks, my Honors English class has been studying a largely controversial argument; is behavior formed in a child because of their nature or the way they are nurtured. This is the nature vs. nurture controversy. In the nurture standpoint, psychology says that external factors and experience create particular aspects of behavior. Nature’s perspective on the case, however, is that behavior is influenced by genetic and other biological factors. Modern scientists now believe that there seems to be a mixture of the two ideas, and it is not so “all or nothing”. By combining the two ideas, could this possibly mean that the parents experiences could have an affect on a child’s behavior or help us predict it.

The debate between nature verse nurture theories focus on whither a person’s development is dependent upon ones genetic blueprint or the

Nature versus Nnurture is the most argued topic between Psychologists and Scientists worldwide. Those who believe in the nurture aspect think that people acquire their behaviors from their environment and surroundings. Those who believe that genetics are the reason we are who we are argue the nature perspective. Both sides have valid arguments but I tend to agree with the Nnurture theory. I believe that you acquire your personality traits from your parents, siblings, and other people who are an active part of your life. Kids are always trying to act like their parents. I remember when my girls were little and they used to go in my closet and put on my jewelry and heels and pretend to be me. They were imitating what they saw every day of their life. That isn’t something that they were born with. It is an acquired trait.

The nature-nurture debate has been a common topic among psychologists for years. Those who support the nurture side of the argument believe that human characteristics and abilities are a product of evolution and genetics. I, on the other hand, support the nature side of the debate. I believe that we learn through experience growing up with the people or things around us and the general environment we are exposed to. When you are growing up with your siblings, you resemble similar intelligence levels with your siblings, as goes with the parents who took care of you as you were growing up. It’s something that does not happen right away, but, if you are accustomed to those surrounding you for a long period of time, no matter who it is or what

The debate of nature versus nurture has been an ongoing debate for a long time. When applying this argument to education there is no proven winner. The nature side of the coin believes that a person is born the way that they are. This could include intelligence level or personality traits such as being outgoing or shy. The other side of the argument of nurture believes that the type of upbringing that someone has will play a large role in the way they develop. It is thought that if a child has proper parenting and schooling then their educational achievements will be higher than one who is from a “broken” home where education is not a high priority. This writer’s belief is that both nature and nurture come into play, but nurture has a bigger role in dictating ones success in school and life.

Scientists still agree that biology does play a part in human behavior, however. Nature and nurture do not oppose each other in every manner. Today, social scientists hesitate to choose one or the other. As humans, life depends solely on the operating of the body. This is seen especially in children. It is obvious that children share their biological traits, such as hair or eye color, with that of their parents. Heredity also plays a part in their intelligence, how artistic they are, and their overall personality. We all have “potential” inheritances, in which their full development depends on how we are all raised. Both sides

The nature side of the debate believes that our genes and other biological factors are the sole influencers of your personalities. They claim that everything we are as adults is with us as children (McLeod). Multiple studies have been done on pairs of twins, who had been separated at birth. Many revealed that genetics are important in some personality traits and other characteristics, such as sexual orientation. One study revealed that the environment in which they are raised had very little impact on their personality development, but only if they were raised in the same environment (“Nature vs. Nurture”). The evolutionary and biological perspectives support this side, which state that natural selection can lead to the promotion of some genes or traits and that certain