Nature Vs. Nurture In Children

“Twins have been the heart and soul of the nature versus nurture debate for over a century” (Plicher 1). Scientists and psychologists believe that because identical twins share 100% of the same genes, that studying twins, would benefit in proving the theory. Twins that are separated at birth end up living in different environments. Because they grow up differently, scientists and psychologists are able to analyze the genetic and environmental influences that shape the twins personalities. Even though the discussion of the nature versus nurture topic has not yet been proven, some feel nurture wins. The study of twins contributes to the debate of nature versus nurture and whether the environment or genetics affects the development of personality.

Nature Vs Nurture is often the huge debate in psychology when it comes to determining and understanding individual’s characteristics traits. Nature is hereditary to our behavior while nurture is based on our environmental influences. Although most argue whether or not nature or nurture defines our characteristics, I believe both have an impact on we are.

The debate between nature versus nurture keeps coming out these years whenever people talk of children’s developmental issues. In the topic of bullying, there are both nature and nurture reasons to make a child acts aggressively. According to Klahr, Klump and Burt (2014), children’s antisocial behaviors are strongly affected by the environmental factors. These factors included negative parenting styles and parent-child relationships. In this way, if a child sees his or her parents act aggressively toward others, so it is predictable that the child is likely to bully his or her peers to some extent.

Susan Evers and Sharon McKendrick, the famous identical twins from the movie The Parent Trap, were separated at a young age by their divorcing parents. Sharon grew up in Boston to a socialite mother while Susan grew up in California on her father’s ranch. Sharon had structure while Susan’s life was very laid back. They looked the same and liked many of the same things, yet their personalities were very different. What is responsible for these differences? Is it simply that they are two different people with different interests and preferences? Or did the environments that they grew up in play a part in making who they are? In the nature vs. nurture controversy, nature proclaims that our genetic make-up plays the primary role in human

Explain the developmental controversy of nature vs. nurture. Be sure to provide an example to illustrate the point.

Once a child is born and their development continues, then starts the controversy and wonder as to whether how the child is raised effects their outcome in adult hood, or whether they are just born to be a certain way. Child psychology looks into the many different factors that affect the pregnancy and raising a child. Such as, parenting styles, and how the environment (nurture) and the genetics (nature) play an important role in the child’s development.

There are few mysteries that are greater or provoke more debate than that which dictates human individuality. Sociologists, psychologists and genealogists have long argued over the roles played by the inherent genetic and biological features of an individual and the environmental, contextual and experiential realities surrounding the individual where the development of personality, ability and orientation are concerned. This underscores the debate between nature and nurture. To what extent each of these forces figures into an individual's development and growth is the subject of intense ideological and philosophical discussion. Here, we put forth the assertion that all human beings are a product of some combination of both.

Language is a good example for nature- nurture. A child definitely is definitely not born with language; it is one of the complex cognitive skills that are pertinent to human. However, as language is not hereditary, you cannot begin to teach an infant a language and expect him/her to speak immediately. The child would only speak at the certain age when the biological system is ready for it. But consider the task of task of teaching a hen a human language of any sort; it won’t learn it no matter how long because its biological makeup will not accept such a task.

Development occurs between many contexts for example the child's genes interacting with the child's home and their family members, pre-school settings and early childhood practitioners, facilities and business' in the community working together to support and educate a child as advocated by the bioecological model (Hayes et al, 2017). Children are highly influenced by people and places that they are introduced to, these influence development both directly for example early childhood practitioners, or indirectly for example the wider community (Hayes et al, 2017).

Nature versus Nurture is a popular debate about whether our genetics, or environmental influences "mold" more of who we are. An example is whether you get your out-going personality because of your DNA, or because you grew up in an environment that made you out-going. Nature is your genes, Nurture is environmental influences.Read more: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_argument_of_nature_vs_nurture#ixzz29QTunXP3

The nature vs. nurture issues is the most important study of human development for many reasons. In fact, both issues play an important role in human development over time. One main reason why nature vs. nurture is an important study in psychology today is because of its developmental traits. Traits are characteristics inherited from your parents. Also, a trait is something that is passed down from generation, such as a person’s personality.

A lifespan model consists of identifying the interconnections between earlier and later events in ones life while specifying the biological, psychological and environmental factors that shape and influence development. My personal developmental theory consists of several tenets from theories such as, nature vs. nurture, systems and cognitive developmental theory. While there are many theories in lifespan development, and they are all relevant in the development of an individual I found these particular theories the most influential in my development.

We can not fully predict a child's behavior based on its or it’s parent’s past experiences. All children are different and will react to things in a different way. Some children who have parents who struggle with drug abuse will turn out like their parents, but others will not, so we can not tell for sure what kind of behavior the child has. We can predict aspects of the child’s behavior but not all of it’s behavior. Like if the child has a parent who is addicted to drugs and in it’s past experience, it reacted to the parent in a negative way or started to do drugs then you will sort of know how that child will react. I have read two articles dealing with this debate and they helped my answer to this question form.

Both nature and nurture play a role in children reaching milestones. According to SPUC.org.uk every human being starts developing well before birth, at the moment of conception. Unborn children develop and grow at a remarkable speed. With the advances in technology like ultrasound scan, we can learn more about the development of children even before they are born.

Scientists have been investigating about genetic inheritance and its influence on behavior in humans. A gene is the unit of heredity that is passed on from parent to offspring. These investigations have been conducted because there has been a lot of debate about whether human behavior is more influenced by genetics or the environment. This debate is also called “Nature Vs. Nurture”. Although there is a clear correlation between genetics and behavior, genetic inheritance only has a partial influence due to the environmental factors that also play a role in shaping behavior. This statement can be supported by correlational studies that have been performed by numerous scientists over many years.