Nature Vs. Nurture In The Divergent Trilogy

The debate on nature versus nurture is an old philosophical issue in psychology. Nature involves all genes as well as hereditary factors, which influence who we are. These range from the physical appearance to the personality features of a person. Nurture involves all environmental variables, which determine who we are: experiences during early childhood, how one is raised, the surrounding culture, and one’s social relationships. Biological psychology today insists on the significance of genet is as well as biological influences. When it comes to behavioral psychology, the most important thing is how the environment affects behavior. Unlike earlier when debates on relative contributions of the concept took a one-sided approach, experts currently

The nature vs nurture issue has been a controversial argument among psychologist for decades. This argument exposes two different views. One of them emphasizes that our personality depends solely on genetics (nature). On the other hand, the second view suggests that humans “develop through experience” (Myers 2013, SG 6) (nurture).

Nature plays an important role and shapes a human's lifestyle. The question is which has a greater influence, Nature genes that we're born with or Nurture the environment we live in? Nowadays people tend to live and act based on their Genes. Genes can be anything from a person's height, hair color, eye color, fatigue, personality, and behaviors. Humans have been inheriting traits from decades ago. Nevertheless, Researchers and Psychologists and Scientists think that Genes are the answer to our actions. I agree with them because “You inherit your environment just as much as your genes" – Johnny Rich. This essay will persuade the reader as to why I chose Nature, why/how is it more important than Nurture, provide case studies/examples and reasons for Nature's importance.

Nature versus nurture is one of the most controversial topics of discussion among human beings. For many years, phycologist’s have been studying various people’s behavioral patterns in order to settle the debate. The argument of nature suggests that a person is born with a pre-conceived set of personality traits that determine the way they will act for the rest of their life. That is to say that all characteristics of a person, not just physical appearance, are passed down through genetics. The case with nurture states the idea that every person, no matter where they are from, is born with a blank slate. In other words, asserting that the behavior of someone is solely a result of their surroundings. This subject often comes up when a person

This controversial debate has existed since 1869, when the phrase "Nature Versus Nurture" was coined by the English polymath, Francis Galton. Nature refers to what we are born with and includes our biology, genetics, and similar characteristics. In contrast, nurture refers to what is learned, through our cultural community and other individuals. For anthropologists, this debate often centers on the influences of nature and nurture in different cultural elements. Both nature and nurture influences affect the human beings and their culture. The book On the Origin of Species written by Charles Darwin had a significant impact on Francis Galton. In Galton’s two publication, Hereditary Genius (1869) and English Men of Science: Their Nature and Nurture (1874), he explored the world of inheritance and

Through history, the idea of nature vs. nurture has been a hotly debated issue. Nature, or genetics is often believed to be the most important aspect of a persons’ upbringing, as nature is something intrinsic to any one person. However, many debate that nurture, or the care and encouragement of any human life, trumps nature. The earliest evidence and rebuttals of these theories have been honed and developed over time by specific psychologists and educational theorists – all who hoped to prove their own ideas as fact at one time in history.

The significance of nature and nurture has been a prolonged debate that has caused quite a controversy and the discoveries made on this topic have made harder to determine which side is the most crucial. Multiple experiments and research studies have been conducted to prove one is better or stronger than the other and they continue to be conducted. As a species, human beings inherited DNA from our ancestors, but what impacts our actions the most is our environment. The predetermined genes are impactful, but it is what one makes of it that shapes oneself. The path is driven by the human being. The way we carry ourselves out is affected by the choices we make, but the way we have evolved mentally comes from the nurturing of our caretakers.

Nature against nurture – that’s one of the most popular questions ever studied in psychology. Even today no one knows for sure what’s more valuable for our human development – nurture or nature. Many researches, experiments and discussions have been conducted to answer this question, but positive results are still unavailable. In this nature vs nurture essay you’ll find a brief history, significant characteristics of the nature versus nurture problem and fresh original thoughts on the

The controversial debate of nature versus nurture has been around since 1869. The phrase “Nature Versus Nurture” was created by the English polymath, Francis Galton. Galton was influenced by a book written by his cousin, Charles Darwin, On the Origin of Species. Darwin’s book introduces the scientific theory of how populations evolve through the process of natural selection. Galton was the first to apply statistical methods to the study of human intelligence inheritance. This allowed him to determine what percentage of a person’s knowledge came from their genetics. Galton’s studies still continue to be used to this day.

Nature versus Nurture is a popular debate about whether our genetics, or environmental influences "mold" more of who we are. An example is whether you get your out-going personality because of your DNA, or because you grew up in an environment that made you out-going. Nature is your genes, Nurture is environmental influences.Read more: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_argument_of_nature_vs_nurture#ixzz29QTunXP3

In many social fields the discussion of nature vs. nurture is a common theme. However, in recent discussions it is being found to be too simplistic. This argument is being rejected for two claims, according to Brian Garvey, the stronger claim states that it is possible to attribute a trait wholly to the influence of genes or wholly to the influence of the environment (Garvey, 2005). While the weaker claim states that it is possible to talk of traits more or less under the control of genes or environment. Garvey explains that both of these claims are rejected, “because it makes no sense to talk of a trait as more the product of genes than of environment (Garvey, 2005).” Since the nature vs. nurture theory deals with the stronger of the two claims,

Do genes make us who we are? Or, is it the environmental factors that we were raised in? Nature and nurture play an important role when it comes to our characteristics and traits. Evidence of the two has been proven over the years, and are shown to be entwined due to many years of studies, in many countries, and on many test subjects.

Through history, the idea of nature vs nurture has been a hotly debated issue. Nature, or genetics is often believed to be the most important aspect of a persons’ upbringing, as nature is something very intrinsic to any one person. However, many debate that nurture, or the care and encouragement of any human life, trumps nature. The earliest (proofs?) and rebuttals of these theories have been honed and developed over time by specific psychologists and educational theorists – all who hoped to prove their own ideas as fact at one time in history.

Nature and nurture terminologies are used concurrently to explain human behavior. Initially brought forward by Francis Galton, they study the impact of the environment and heredity on an individual’s behaviour. Nature dictates that an individual’s behaviour and reaction to stimuli is determined by their DNA formation. Charles Darwin influenced Galton’s theory. Nurture, on the other hand, holds the view that traits and characteristics are formed from an individual’s interaction with family and the community, beginning with primary socialization. John Locke in 1960 referred to this situation as tabula rasa, or an empty slate (Larkin 2009).

The term ‘nature versus nurture’ is a widely discussed phenomenon in modern day psychology. It refers to the debate of whether human behavior is attributed more to inherited traits or to environmental influences. When psychologists discuss environment, they can include a physical place, cultural practices, or just the people one surrounds themselves with in social settings. Social psychology discusses how people influence others’ behaviors, actions and beliefs (Lilienfeld, S; Lynn, S; Namy, L; Woolf, N, 2014, pg 496). Our environment, or more specifically the people around us, can influence us to act in atypical ways without our realizing it. Because humans are a social species, we are affected by our society and have a natural tendency to conform to the behaviors of people around us (Lilienfeld et al, 2014, page 503).