Truman Capote Nature Vs Nurture

This literature review will analyze what people think about the nature versus nurture debate. It will talk about the nature side and the nurture side of the debate.

"Nature or nurture?",A common psychological question about whether a person acts a certain way because of their DNA or their upbringing. Nature is inherited traits of which can 't be controlled such as eye color. Nurture is the upbringing by our parents and family members. In the story In Cold Blood, Truman Capote talks about how Dick Hicock and Perry Smith committed four brutal murders. In this essay, we will go more in depth on how the nature and nurture of Dick made him do what he did.

Richard Mulcaster, a British instructor of English, once wrote, “Nature makes the boy toward, nurture sees him forward.” Mulcaster recognizes that both genetic and environmental factors determine the type of a person one becomes. Truman Capote’s nonfiction novel, In Cold Blood gives the reader an opportunity to see prime examples of how nature and nurture influence one’s character. Capote’s novel, In Cold Blood introduces the reader to two men; Richard Eugene Hickock known as Dick throughout the novel, and Perry Edward Smith whose lives of crime are almost identical; although both Perry and Richard come from very humble backgrounds, their childhood particularly their family life, has very little in common. It is not until later in their

People have their theories about the existence of criminals. Quite a few claim that it is due to “nurture”, that undesirable environments create lawbreakers, while others claim that it is just “nature”, that certain people just have a natural attraction to crime. In Cold Blood, a 1965 nonfiction novel by Truman Capote, documents the grisly murder of a beloved family that had left the little town of Holcomb in unrest and two men's attempts to evade law enforcement on their journey through the states.

The historical debate regarding nature and nurture has been going on for years and is still unresolved. Many theorists believe what we have inherited and our genes, makes us the way we are and how we develop. Other theorists believe it is the way we are brought up and our experiences, that make us the way we are and how we develop.

masterfully depicts the lives of Dick Hickock and Perry Smith, the reaction of a small town

Truman Capote’s In Cold Blood was revolutionary on several accounts, one being that it created an entirely new genre that combined nonfiction with literature. Another groundbreaking aspect of the novel was how effectively Capote was able to establish his opinion on whether nature or nature had the greatest effect on the fate of an individual. In artful descriptions of the personalities and backgrounds of the characters Perry Smith and Dick Hickock, Capote expertly discloses his opinion that both nature and nurture can create criminals. Capote presents Dick as a young man with an average childhood and loving parents; Perry, on the other hand, emerged from a childhood of trauma, a life of abuse, and no authority figure to show him clear morals.

Truman Capote’s acclaimed “non-fiction” novel, In Cold Blood explores the concept as to whether killers are born or made, following the brutal murders of the Clutter family in rural Kansas. Capote develops Perry Smith’s horrid, unfortunate upbringing as a key narrative device which serves to illustrate the effect of childhood experiences on adult behaviour. Capote manipulates the reader’s idea of morality, controversially portraying Perry Smith in a sympathetic fashion despite his crimes, in an attempt to explain, if not justify, his actions. Capote juxtaposes two different perspectives on the crime, emphasising the difference between the victims’ background and that of the

One of the main, and most controversial topics discussed in a child’s development is, nature vs. nurture. Nature pertains to genetic influences that a child has inherited from their parents, such as traits, abilities, and capacities. For instance, what color eyes the child may have, how athletic they may be, and even their brain development. Whereas nurture, refers to the environment the child is raised in and how this shapes their behaviors. Such factors can include, the family’s socio-economic status, schooling, parental discipline, as well as whether the child is provided with enough resources. When it comes to nature or nurture having a stronger influence then the other, the answer is both, nature and nurture, influence the outcome of the child. This idea that both nature and nurture, play a part in how the child will develop, is known as the nature-nurture continuum.

The ongoing debate of the topic “Nurture” is more important than “nature”, has been considered true many times throughout the world from books to real life scenarios and events, but what is our meaning of “nurture” and “nature”? The common aspect of “nurture” is where outside influences determine what we will be like society being an example, while “nature” is basically that genetics determine the outcome of how people turn out. There is an easy argument for the case of “nurture”, but just because of the argument being an easy case, is it really true? People acquire their personalities, opinions and beliefs through “nurture”, while they also inherit a much deeper meaning of quality through “nature”, being that, quality is the trait which it takes to commit murder, seek risk, or become an accountant. That is why the statement “nurture” is more important than “nature”is false.

Through history, the idea of nature vs. nurture has been a hotly debated issue. Nature, or genetics is often believed to be the most important aspect of a persons’ upbringing, as nature is something intrinsic to any one person. However, many debate that nurture, or the care and encouragement of any human life, trumps nature. The earliest evidence and rebuttals of these theories have been honed and developed over time by specific psychologists and educational theorists – all who hoped to prove their own ideas as fact at one time in history.

In this document I wish to inform the reader of the merits of both theories, rather than choosing a side. I wish to express that both have their merits, and their flaws. The nature theory place importance on the biological characteristics of one, whereas the nurture theory place its point on the importance of how one is acted towards and treated. I wish to inform the reader beforehand that I will base the paper off of my own experiences. The theories will be in order. (Nature, Nurture, Nature, Nurture, etc…)

The debate between nature verse nurture theories focus on whither a person’s development is dependent upon ones genetic blueprint or the

Individuals wanted to find out if the formation of who they are was due to them being a product of nature or nurture. Many people think we are who we are because of either nature or nurture although what researchers have concluded is that it is in fact due to both. Nature is known to be all the characteristics one would be born with, meaning factors inherited from family members at birth, as it is in their genes. Nurture, on the other hand is identified as the environment and the experience. This is suggesting it’s similar to the outside world; the surroundings they encounter throughout their life, as well as the way in which they were brought up as a child. It is said that “The reality is far more complex, involving not only interactions between

The Nature vs. Nurture has been a long never ending debate for some time now. Nature vs Nurture has been so profoundly debated, that now it’s unclear whether what makes us who we are and what we do, nature or nurture. For purposes of this essay Nature is going to be defined as characteristics we acquire through our genetic and biological factors, while that Nurture is going to be defined characteristics we acquire through our interactions and influences with the environment. There are endless ways of taking an approach to the Nature vs Nurture conflict, thus the reason that it’s truly unclear if its Nature or Nurture or even both what makes us who and what we are.