Nature Vs Nurture On Intelligence

The brain is one of the most complex, unknown organs of the human body. Researchers often break down the characteristics of the brain to whether tendencies are achieved through nurtured environments or the inheritability of genetics. Intelligence is one of the most controversial topics when it comes to deciding whether environment or genetics are most influential. Many argue that intelligence is based on environmental factors and the unique ability to work hard, but fail to realize the essential cognitive qualities concerning what truly defines intelligence. Although some may consider this trait as based on environment, intelligence is a cognitive attribute established by the nature of genetics.

When including intelligence with nature vs. nurture, many thoughts come to mind. As we previously learned in our textbooks, nature is “the biological inheritance and

One of the main, and most controversial topics discussed in a child’s development is, nature vs. nurture. Nature pertains to genetic influences that a child has inherited from their parents, such as traits, abilities, and capacities. For instance, what color eyes the child may have, how athletic they may be, and even their brain development. Whereas nurture, refers to the environment the child is raised in and how this shapes their behaviors. Such factors can include, the family’s socio-economic status, schooling, parental discipline, as well as whether the child is provided with enough resources. When it comes to nature or nurture having a stronger influence then the other, the answer is both, nature and nurture, influence the outcome of the child. This idea that both nature and nurture, play a part in how the child will develop, is known as the nature-nurture continuum.

The nature versus nurture debate is the scientific, cultural, and philosophical debate about whether human culture, behavior, and personality are caused primarily by nature or nurture. Within the field of psychology, this so-called nature-nurture debate, is very often associated with the issue of intellectual quotient, better known as IQ. In the past psychologists have argued that the way in which a child developed was based solely on nature, genetic or hormone-based behaviors, or nurture, environment and experience. Nevertheless, this extreme way of thinking is now long outdated, and it is clear that both nature and nurture have great effect on our intellectual development. The question now lies in just how much impact each has on an

Nurture intelligence is another factor which is still unfolded. Some believe that upbringing a child in a proper environment can effect their mood, body and their views towards to world. If someone’s brought up in an environment where he or she gets all the facilities and necessities of daily life, it will help through the entire life, in saying that if the person receives the correct surroundings, family support, supportive friends circle, it can help them throughout the journey of life. Family habits, interests and company of good people as mentioned above will leave a significant effect on the person’s development. The nature theory holds the genetic influence over abstract traits however, the environmental factors are the real origins of our behaviour. We want to be according to the environment around us. At the end we are still confused which way is right nature or nurture since both sides have valid reasons to be right. Some traits come to us by genes and some we experience through travelling and experiencing different situations in our lifetime, which is a proven fact. Nurture helps shape our intelligence in the sense that what surrounds us is what we end up liking and

Studies have shown a discrepancy in average IQ scores between whites and minority groups in the United States. The reason IQ is such of big factor is because many people associate IQ with high mental functions. More specifically it is considered that having a high, average, or low IQ presents qualities are an important factor in success for example: dedication; motivation; self-confidence; and social skills. Nature vs. Nurture has been skewed in recent years rather than even 10 years ago because of this concept of IQ because the thing that I wanted to understand was that can one’s metal functions be impacted by what you inherit from your parents alone (nature) or can it be influenced by where and how you matured in life

nurture” and its effects. The article that I found on the internet stated that when people were first trying to understand the mind, people tended to be more extremist with their opinions on nature vs. nurture. “John Locke believed in what is known as tabula rasa, which suggests that the mind begins as a blank slate. According to this notion, everything that we are and all of our knowledge is determined by our experience.” (Cherry) . Over time, with more research, it seems to be that nature and nurture work together to form who a person is, but when it comes to intelligence, scientists still debate which of the two may be a more powerful determinant.

Is child development and learning affected by both nature and nurture? This is a world-wide phenomenon that is pathing the way to many healthy debates from human beings of all socio-economic status around the globe. Yes, both nature and nurture factor into child development in such immense ways, but when thinking about what is the makeup to child development, which influence plays a more significant role in that theory, or are they on equal playing fields. Nature and nurture work simultaneously to address the physical, emotional, relational, intellectual, and spiritual aspects of a child's life, but if we decode the whole child and lay out the concrete steps to child development there are more key and important rudiments submerged into nurture.

Throughout time, nature and nurture have been examined to be two of the most essential topics to which the human was developed. However, the troublesome question that is asked is whether or not one has a more critical impact on human development. Before one can conclude if either is the key component of human development, one must first understand what both nature and nurture establish. While nature is characterized as the genetic makeup of a person through the inherited traits of one’s parents, nurture confronts the perception that adapting and changing to fit certain environmental factors form humans. Many theorists have brought into consideration their theories to demonstrate which approach resolves the question. Unfortunately, there is

Throughout history, philosophers, scientist and psychologists have always possessed different opinions on what gives humans distinct characteristics. “Nature”, includes heredity which is a biological component that is believed to affect IQ while “Nurture” is when one’s environment which shapes us through various experiences. Those who are inquisitive about life commonly reflect on their lives, wondering whether they would be different if their experiences in childhood were altered; childhood experiences or our social environment ever so greatly affects our personalities. Withstanding that, nurture has the ability to change an individual's characteristics based on social environment. However, the severity of these changes is different for each

Intelligence has been a cause of debate between psychological researchers for many years. This question of nature vs nurture can be examined in many ways. Although many psychologists argue for and against the nature nurture debate and agree that the many characteristics and personality traits are caused by nature and nurture both working together. Through the many developmental studies of famous researchers, it helps us assume that the influence of nurture outweighs that of nature. Plato and Aristotle, for instance, were both philosophers with different views on the issue. Plato believed that knowledge and behaviour were due to innate factors, meaning heredity, whilst Aristotle, also written by philosopher John Locke backed up the idea of tabula

With all this said, the point of view that there are external influences that can affect one’s intelligence, become very convincing.

The nature or genetics of a person are the raw basis that describes a person while the nurturing or environment of a situation is what shapes a person in to what they become. In my case of athletic ability, nature and nurture go hand in hand. The genetics of my parents helped shaped my raw athletic talents, but the environment that they created helped develop those talents in to what they are today. If it was not for the nurturing that they provided me, I may not have worked as hard and may not be as good of an athlete that I am. My academic success is also a product of my genetics with the development of my environment. It is proven that genetics play a very significant role in a person’s intelligence, but if it was not for my parents teaching me the importance of an education, I may have never pursued academic success like I do. The nature of a person gives them a raw intelligence, but if their environment does not teach them how to use or the importance of that intelligence, it may not develop

The subject introduced has nothing to do with the nurture vs nature theory. During the development of a child genetics are an important factor, but it is not the most important when determining the intelligence of an individual. The most important element to a child's intelligence development is the baby's environment. The baby’s surrounding can change

Intelligence is used by everyone to help them in everyday life. Where people get their intelligence, however, is debatable. A person is born with an amount of inherited intelligence; this intelligence is considered nature, genetic, or heredity. Then there is intelligence that comes from the ability to learn from experience; this intelligence is impacted by nurture or the environment. It is known that both genetic and environmental factors determine intelligence, but the subject is controversial among professionals. Does nature or nurture have a bigger impact on intelligence? Is it true that some people are born with high intelligence, but are limited by their environment? Given the proper tools, can a person increase their intelligence? How accurate are IQ tests?