Nature Vs Nurture Research Paper

Nature vs Nurture is something that has been researched for many years especially when it comes to finding the reason for someone committing a crime. When talking about nature, I am talking about how you are born. The genes that you are born with that make you who you are. When referring to nurture I am talking about how someone is raised. Such as the environment you live in and what is taught to you. As humans we cannot control our nature it is simply what you are born with. When you are born you have all your genes that will decide what you look like, how tall or short you will be, so why do we not believe that our behavioral tendencies, and personality attributes come from our genes too. Psychological theories such as the biological approach, and psychoanalysis have helped to show us how are genetics predetermine our behavior. Researchers have found multiple facts that support each side and for years no one has been able to decide which one influences us over the other one. I believe that our nature has a greater impact on us then our nurture especially when it comes to criminal actions.

One of the oldest debates in psychology is nature versus nurture. Nature is the inborn, innate character of an organism. (Spencer A. Rathus pg. 56) Nurture is the sum total of the environmental factors that affect an organism from conception onward. (Spencer A. Rathus pg. 56) Basically nature is what you have from heredity and nurture is you environmental influences.

The debate over nature vs. nurture has been researched and studied today and as well in the past amongst many different scholars with different views. Nature defines the characteristics that we are born with, like our genetics, stable personality traits, and physical conditions. While on the other hand, nurture is when our environment determines who a person is and who they will become; the experiences that mold and change us throughout our lives are all examples of nurture. Today, within many types of research it has been proven that a person is not born as a killer, instead, they are nurtured into one considering the way their parents raise them, what they are taught at school, and their culture. (Examination of the Psychology of Serial Killers,

The nature vs Nurture debate allows us to see if behavioral tendencies, personality attributes and mental abilities are already a part of us before we are already born. Nature is influenced by genetic inheritance and biological factors. Nurture is the influence of external factors after conception, with experience and learning

When it comes to the debate of whether counselors and born or made, I think that my stance falls more in the center of both extremes. I don't think that it is impossible to be a good counselor if you were not praised for your abilities to be easy to talk to at an early age, but I do think that there are some personalities that may be better suited for different types of counseling. I believe that counselors should approach the field and developed both, from scientific and intuition or feeling based skills. I think that over time even if you did not begin with a natural therapeutic way of being you can develop into a good counselor, if that it what you really want and strive for. I also don't that counseling should only be based off learning from experiences but should also partly rely on the scientific foundations and theories in which counseling was based upon.

“In the real world there is no nature versus nurture, only an infinitely complex and moment-by-moment interaction between genetic and environmental effects,” (Gabor Maté, goodreads.com). Nature is something no one has control over, but nurture is another story. Nature is what is passed down from the parents, such as eye, skin, and hair color. Nurture are the influences around someone, such as peers, the media, friends, and parents. “High school students them former classmates of Nancy and Kenyon Clutter, chanted cheerleader rhymes, bubbled, bubblegum, gobbled hotdogs, and soda pop” (The Answer, 192). In the following paragraphs, I will explain why I believe nurture is more overpowering than nature.

Throughout growing up, an individual is told they can do and become anything they want to as long as they put their mind to it. That is great for someone to understand, but despite knowing this philosophical viewpoint, people quickly learn that some individuals are better than others at certain activities. I’m sure throughout school you realized that some students comprehended skills quicker than others.

nurture is environmental factors, where nature is what a person is born with. Both of these are very important and it is actually quite hard to decide whcih is more important than the other. I did some research on this topic and found there are many debates. For this assigment i decided to say nurture is more important in a childs learning because if a teacher does not no whats going on at home they may jump to concolusions about the child. Nurture doesnt just mean home life either, its friends, neighboors, groups and children can become easily peerpresured into doing something they dont want to do which could lead bullying, and i believe it is our goal as future educators to provvent that from happing. that is why i sided on team nurture though

Nurture is one of the two things that will deal with our lives. Nurture for my preference has a 51% because it deals with how you talk, Etc.Nurture deals alot with how you act, walk, talk, and your brain doesn't grow like it is supposed to. The girl that was abused and was disconnected from the outer world

What impacts us more? Is it Mother Nature or Mother Nurture? That is the question that has been on debate for generations. Is it the genetics given to us by our parents and what comes along, or perhaps the environment we were raised in that determines our future? Most biologists and scientists will likely say that nature is more powerful. Psychologists on the other hand believe the nurturing aspect of raising a child is more powerful. The significance of this issue is that this is the determining argument of what makes us who we are, who we are likely to be and how we compare to everyone else.

In psychology, one of the number one questions asked is nature or nature? In the case of nature versus nurture, we know that nature has to do with our genetics and nurture has to do with the environment. In application, nature versus nurture is trying to decide what is the cause of the condition under question. We ask, do the people with personality disorders have these disorders because it was passed down from their parents, or is it because of some experience in their life?

Dr. Carol Staley-Abney asked the questions, “One of the oldest and most studied questions within all disciplines of psychology is the nature versus nurture debate. What influences us to think and act the way we do-nature or nurture?” Well, what is nature and nurture you ask? Nature is the inborn, innate character of an organism. Nurture is the sum total of the environment factors that affect an organism from conception onward.

Nature plays a huge part in our lives. It is believed we are born with these characteristics. Over the course of our lives these features will come across us and the people around us. The same article argues that “children brought up in a ghetto environment tend to score lower on tests because they are denied the same life changes as a more privileged members of society”. This section agrees with nurture. If a person is raised in a family where beliefs, values and morals are high expected their way of thinking will have a positive impact on their life. This will be reflected in their behavior. It may be the opposite of a person who was never thought values and morals. There is not an accurate answer for the nature and nurture debate as of now. Many believe is a combination of the two. A section from our textbook implies that “psychologists

“Modern science wields dozens of senses. And scientists do not claim these to be the expression of special powers, just special hardware. In the end, of course, the hardware converts the information gleaned from these extra senses into simple tables, charts, diagrams, or images that our inborn senses can interpret.” -Mr. Neil deGrasse Tyson, accomplished astrophysicist and director of the Hayden Planetarium at the American Museum of Natural History.

Are we who we? Is it solely based on nature, nurture or do the two both play an intricate part in our make up. This is one of the oldest arguments in the history of psychology. Each side has interesting points that make it difficult to decide whether a person’s development is decided through DNA, or is it influenced through the environment in which they grow up. We do know that both nature and nurture play important roles in human development. It is a debate that will probably continue for centuries to come.