Nature Vs Nurture Research Paper

One of the oldest debates in psychology is nature versus nurture. Nature is the inborn, innate character of an organism. (Spencer A. Rathus pg. 56) Nurture is the sum total of the environmental factors that affect an organism from conception onward. (Spencer A. Rathus pg. 56) Basically nature is what you have from heredity and nurture is you environmental influences.

Nature versus Nurture is the issue of the degree to which environment and heredity influence behavior and development. In this issue nature can be defined as, behaviors due to heredity. Which means behaviors are based on the genetic makeup of an individual and is an influence of the individuals' growth and development throughout life. On the other hand nurture are causes of behaviors that are environmental. Which means the influence is from, parents, siblings, family, friends and all other experiences to which the individual is exposed to.

Nurture can also relate to the saying “ Surround yourself with people you want to be like in life”. The people someone associates with in their life can cause either a positive or negative impact in someone’s life. Studies show that because that school is where kids spend most of their time and interacting with their peers. Bullying is prime example for how people can affect someone's life with bullying you can make someone’s life a bad experience and influence them to feel worthless and may become depressed and can end up harming

Nurture refers to society, family, and church that impacts who we become. Some examples are how we are raised, where we are raised and our experiences during childhood. If a person is raised in a religious setting they will probably have those same morals and beliefs when they are older. If they were in foster system that will effect who they become depending on their experience in foster care.

Today most interest in twins serves to determine whether traits come from ones environment or from genetics. However, throughout time, twins have been a constant source of entertainment and amazement for society. Twins differ very little, and according to an e-mail interview with Dr. Nancy Segal, the American attraction to them is due to our high value and appreciation of independency and personal differences. Segal believes the similarity of twins contrasts greatly with Americans values and this contrast sparks interest, almost to the nature of a circus sideshow. Because most singletons find the eerie alikeness of twins mystifying, myths and urban legends about twin behavior are not uncommon. For instance, the belief twins share more

Very Well Mind has explained the definitions and thought processes of scientists and biologists. Nature refers to all of the genes and hereditary factors that influence who we are—from our physical appearance to our personality characteristics. Nurture refers to all the environmental variables that impact who we are, including our early childhood experiences, how we were raised, our social relationships, and our surrounding culture. Biological variables have been seen as one of the biggest nurturing parts of children. However, some things happen naturally, no matter the influence coming from outside sources.

Numerous people, like Galton, have tried to find where these two terms separate in their means of influence, whereas for others “who used the terms, nurture was rarely, if ever, seen as separable from nature; instead, it was referred to as helping and assisting, or as responding to, nature; nurture was more of a verb than a noun.” (Plonka, 2016) Similar to many things in the world, ideas that state that something works solely by itself is harder to believe than if it were to work with another component of the world around it. Those who believe that nature and nurture work together in sync to influence an organism believe that they show “a crucial biological phenomenon of mutual influences of both hereditary and environmental factors in the trait formation.” (Plonka, 2016) Nature alone cannot determine a person alone, yet nurture only has limited influence as

The topic of whether nature or nurture is more important in the shaping of a person's personality. To start off, the heredity is the passing of mental and physical characteristics from one generation to another. On the other hand of the debate, the nurture/environment is basically the place a person grew up in, personal experiences, early childhood life etc... The debate has a long history as one of the oldest debates in psychology. The longevity of the debate and the great importance of both aspects of a person's personality makes side picking extremely difficult. However, one side does have an advantage over the other.

According to the dictionary the term "Nurture" means to feed and protect, and "Nature" means the particular combination of qualities belonging to a person. Although the brothers have one similarity that I would consider nurturistic, which is there willingness to help people thorough their occupation, I believe the rest of the other similarities that the brothers share fall along the lines of nature. For example, both brothers share the same shoe size which seems to be an inheritance from their parents and that is a natural similarity. Also, the brothers share similar interests such as smoking, reading, exercising, coffee, music, brand of clothing, and religion, which also falls into the category of natural characteristics.

Nature is inherited characteristic that affect development and nurture is environmental condition that effected development. They both have an influence on growth and development in children one way nature influences physical growth is if a child has a chronic illnesses such as asthma, epilepsy, kidney disease and multiple sclerosis. For example people who have multiple sclerosis have problems with their brain and spinal cord people with MS have weakness, tingling, numbness, blurred vison and muscle stiffness. Child who would be diagnosis with MS would have a hard time developing and growing because they man not be able to the things a normal child would be able to. Walking and trying to ride a bike might be harder for them than to a child

In regards to being a “natural born killer”, behavior in a person can ultimately be broken down into it’s biological components. Humans have a “warrior gene” built inside of them and sometimes it’s an uncontrollable urge that just releases with little to know warning. For example, on a drastically smaller scale, you get punched in the face and your immediate reaction is to strike back. That feeling, that action is the “warrior gene” inside of you. That’s part of your DNA to adapt and survive. Some people are born with extremely bad tempers. Where do you think that came from? It’s passed down from generation to generation. Men are more common to strike back, have a poor attitude or make a big deal out of something

Throughout growing up, an individual is told they can do and become anything they want to as long as they put their mind to it. That is great for someone to understand, but despite knowing this philosophical viewpoint, people quickly learn that some individuals are better than others at certain activities. I’m sure throughout school you realized that some students comprehended skills quicker than others.

Nurture Debate states, “The term ‘nurture’ has historically been defined as the care given to children by the parents...”. This states that nurturing is a learned skill important to emotional development. Let us not forget the wisdom from our Grandparents, too. For instance, the love that your family shares with you shows you how to care for and respect other people. Nurturing may also include your culture as it can shape your religious practices and traditions. Further, the nurturing received from your families, friends, and teachers influences decision making, and exposes us to career pathways.

nurture is environmental factors, where nature is what a person is born with. Both of these are very important and it is actually quite hard to decide whcih is more important than the other. I did some research on this topic and found there are many debates. For this assigment i decided to say nurture is more important in a childs learning because if a teacher does not no whats going on at home they may jump to concolusions about the child. Nurture doesnt just mean home life either, its friends, neighboors, groups and children can become easily peerpresured into doing something they dont want to do which could lead bullying, and i believe it is our goal as future educators to provvent that from happing. that is why i sided on team nurture though

A debate on Nature versus Nnurture has been going on for a long time. In this essay I will describe my views on the subject. To examine them side by side we will explore how they both affect intelligence. The Pearson Custom Library Psychology defines nature as “the influence of heredity or genes… (P. 342)” and Nnurture as the “environment (P. 342 Ciccarelli)” affecting one’s personality or intelligence. In other words, how is someone’s environment affecting their mental development compare to their genes?