Nature Vs. Nurture: World's Grandest Debate

Nature or Nurture. Nature may be all of the genes and hereditary factors with which influence them to become who they are such as physical appearances and personality characteristics. Nurturing impacts people’s lives as well as how they are raised and all the environmental factors. In combination, these qualities can be the true identity of oneself. Many people may argue that nurture appears to a play huge factor in the two, but others may think otherwise. Not having both as a characteristic can have a negative effect on a person physically and mentally. The debate of nature versus nurture appears to be the oldest argument known to man, and it still remains to be unanswered. In the old-age argument nature versus nurture, nature may play a huge role in determining a person’s true identity.

One of the huge problems with the nature vs. nurture debate is that people often forget to include religion, beliefs, and God into the discussion. Religion, especially Christianity, plays a large role in the development of a person, being in part nature and nurture. Several people grow up believing God is real and He loves and nurtures everyone, and this can in turn give them an instinct to care and nurture others. But God also gives each person a natural instinct to love and protect others because He created mankind in His likeness, and His love is endless. The article Nature vs Nurture – Which Side is God On? makes the point that “God did not create us to be bad (it’s our nature). Nor does God provide an environment for us where we have to

The nature nurture debate discusses to what extent aspects of behaviour are a product of either inheritance or learning. The nature or inherited aspect of this debate is influenced purely by genetic inheritance and other biological factors. The biological approach to psychology states that behaviour is due to genetics, neurochemical and hormonal changes. Early philosophers such as Plato and Descartes suggest that certain things and behaviours are innate and not due to the environment. It has been excepted for a long while that certain physical characteristics are purely biological and are determined by genetic inheritance this includes aspects of a person such as their eye colour.

On November 15, 1959, four members of the prosperous Clutter family were murdered for seemingly no reason. This led many people to come up with their own ideas of what happened that night. This debate may be answered by psychology. One question that psychologists have is whether people are controlled more by their nature-genetics-or nurture-how they were raised (Mcleod 1). This debate can be used to discuss the motive of murderers, and argue for or against the death penalty in their case. Richard ¨Dick¨ Hickock and Perry Edward Smith, the ¨Clutter Killers,¨ are a perfect example of the nature vs. nurture debate. Perry was more influenced by nurture, while Dick was more influenced by nature.

The nature vs. nurture debate has been a long and bloody battle for the longest time for psychologists. Some believe that we are the products of our environment, meaning that we become who we are as a result of our upbringing, social influences, and schooling among other factors. On the other hand, the naturists believe that outside influences have nothing to do with how we turn out; it all depends on our genes. One psychologist, however, has made the attempt to bridge these two sides together. Robert Plomin’s work in genetics and psychology has helped people understand the roles the environment and genetics play in areas such as education, behavior, and development.

The controversy of nature vs nurture is how children develop in life. Nature is when we develop naturally without any human interference and, nurture is when are taught by humans. the Impact on developmental theories are nature theorist believe in biological explanations, while nurturing theorists believe in observation and age. Children can develop in continuity (continuous) we see that in the all ages the book gave an example of a 2-year-old has no individual friends that are continuously in all 2-year-olds. When a child turns 8 he or she has several friends this is discontinuity friends

Millions of children start new lives every day. The process of their development has always been of question to us; we are completely unaware of the exact processes that they go through. Human psychologist continue to ponder the dispute of whether the factors that structure a human are biological or circumstantial. Several contradicting theories have been made about the nature versus nurture discussion. Through personal experience and being an older sibling, I am able to clearly analyze and make my own conclusions. I believe that nurture is the dominating force compared to nature.

The battle between nature and nurture has been everlasting, a constant debate about what exactly causes criminal behaviour. Psychologists have identified important information and have created assumptions as to why individuals commit crimes. The two most significant clarifications lie in genetic and environmental aspects, which conveys to the nature and nurture controversy. Some believe that criminals are born, these are philosophers who argue that genetics play an important part in how a person behaves. Some believe criminals are made and influenced by society, these are philosophers who argue that it is the environment in which the person is in, such as a person's interaction with society that structures the behaviour

The argument of nature versus nurture is seen throughout parenting books and psychology journals. Can a parent truly change a child or is their future preprogrammed from conception? Parents and psychologists alike grapple with the relationship between nature and nurture. Orenstein (2011), a mother of a young girl, argues that gender is a socially constructed concept. Although she acknowledges general heritable and biological aspects of gender, she believes the environment a child matures in affects their expression of gender. Specifically, she believes young girls are socially reinforced to grow up loving dolls, the color pink, and the idea of princesses. Orenstein discusses how biases regarding gender are reinforced by environment, specifically

The nature vs. nurture debate focusses on the extent to which aspects of behaviour are a due to either inherited (genetic) or acquired (learned) characteristics1. Historically, some theorists have argued that we are born to be the way we are. Others have argued that it is the way we are brought up and influenced by our surroundings that makes us the way we are2. A fixed belief in either one of these theories is referred to as Determinism, whereas a belief that a person’s life can be influenced by the choices they make is known as the ‘free will’ viewpoint. The most commonly held belief, however, is that it is a

Nature vs. nurture debate is one of the oldest arguments in history. Many psychologists have studied the debate, but everyone seems to have a different opinion. “Thousands of people have been investigated

To be honest I believe that nature and nurture are both contributing factors to your life and personality. For example in this quote. “The study, published in Nature Genetics, reviewed almost every twin study done in the last 50 years and found that 49% of the average variation for human traits and diseases were down to genetics, and the other 51% were due to environmental factors. When visiting the nature versus nurture debate, there is overwhelming evidence that both genetic and environmental factors can influence traits and diseases," said lead researcher Dr. Beben Benyamin, from the Queensland Brain Institute (QBI), in a statement. "The findings show that we need to look at ourselves outside of a view of nature versus nurture, and instead look at it as nature and nurture.” (IFLScience.) This study supports my argument by bringing things together instead of keeping them apart. One thing that we as humans do is always separate things so we can identify ourselves separately because it is easier to process. What we should be doing is try to study things as a whole first instead of separately the first time given the opportunity to do

One of the oldest arguments in the history of psychology is the Nature vs Nurture debate. Some famous philosophers suggested that certain things are inborn and occur naturally regardless of environmental influences. In contrast to those beliefs, other thinkers such as John Locke believe that the mind begins as a blank slate.

The idea of “Nature vs. Nurture” is a heavily debated topic of psychology, is a person prone to certain behaviors based on their DNA or based on the environment they are raised in (Montag). As a child who struggles with sensitivity, perfectionism, and anxiety, this is a question I am very curious about. What do I need to know about the environment and people around me as I shape and define my identity? I have been influenced by the socioeconomic, political, and spiritual values of my family.

For more than a century, researchers and psychologists, such as Sir Francis Galton, Charles Darwin, Sigmund Freud and many others, have been trying to understand how people are transformed by their environment. Researchers have mainly argued whether it is in fact our environment or rather genetics, our biological pre-wiring, which has influenced human behavior. This concept ultimately facilitated what is now known as the Nature versus Nurture debate. The Nature aspect states that human behavior is predetermined by our inherited genes or is the product of our innate behavior. The Nurture side of the disagreement postulates that human behavior stems from acquired attributes through individual learning and experiences. Correspondingly, the Object Relations Theory in psychoanalytic psychology supports the position that a person’s natural environment (i.e. family, peers, acquaintances, society) forms human development. The Object Relations theory stresses that it is the relationships between people, more specially family, often between mother and child, that crafts the human psyche.