Naxico Essay

Donald J. Trump, the frontrunner for the Republican nomination for the American 2016 Presidential election, has proposed building a complete and securely patrolled border wall along the 700+ mile border between American and Mexico. Trump has called for complete cooperation and collaboration from Mexico’s government. However, ex-Mexican President Fox, and current Mexican governmental leaders, have stated that they will have no part in helping to finance and build a border wall. This has led Trump to provoke the Mexican government and state that he’ll only build the wall higher if Mexico does not cooperate (Justin & Stanley, 2016). As such, Trump is creating a political mess within American and

In 1994, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was enacted between two industrial countries and a yet still developing nation. This was an agreement that was the first of its kind due to the relationship that the countries had and the investment opportunities that it presented. The United States, Canada, and developing Mexico decided to work towards eliminating most tariffs and non-tariff barriers between the three in order to increase the flow of trade in goods and services. Since its enactment NAFTA has led to the providing of over 40 million more jobs throughout the countries, and it has also tripled merchandise trade between the three participants to an astounding $946 billion USD in 2008 (NAFTA Now). However even then it is still not very clear whether enacting NAFTA was worth the time and effort and in fact the United States may have been better off not having joined NAFTA.

When NAFTA was created, no one really understood the impact that the measure would have on the world economy. Drilling down, NAFTA impacts put Mexican farmers out of business due to the “government-subsidized U.S. Farm products.” (Source: https://www.thebalance.com/disadvantages-of-nafta-3306273) As described in the New York Times, exports from the US to Mexico of “corn and other staples” that were subsidized on average of $20,000 per year by the US Government, resulted in “small farmers finding themselves unable to make a living. Some two million have been forced to leave their farms since Nafta.” (Sources: http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2013/11/24/what-weve-learned-from-nafta/under-nafta-mexico-suffered-and-the-united-states-felt-its-pain

The North American Free Trade Agreement, commonly known as the NAFTA, is a trade agreement between the United States, Canada and Mexico launched to enable North America to become more competitive in the global marketplace (Amadeo, 2011). The NAFTA is regarded as “one of the most successful trade agreements in history” for its impact on increases in agricultural trade and investment among the three contracting nations (North American Free Trade Agreement, 2011). Supporters and opponents of the NAFTA have argued the effects of the agreement on participating nations since its inception; yet, close examination proves that NAFTA has had a relatively positive impact on the economies of the United States, Canada, and Mexico.

NAFTA, North American Free Trade Agreement, is a treaty between the United States, Mexico, and Canada. It is very important especially to American farmers, because it allows the farmers to ship major amounts of corn, cotton, rice, and soybeans to Canada and Mexico. CEO Dwight Roberts said, “There is nothing better going on for the commodities we grow than NAFTA. We are very fortunate that we are next door to Mexico, a country of 120 million people who buy so much of our commodities. For rice, Mexico is the number one market in the world.”

Since its creation in 1994, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is a major issue of debate in the United States. The most important issue with NAFTA is how the agreement affects the U.S. economy. NAFTA has had a broad impact on the U.S. economy through creative destruction, globalization, job restructuring, and isolationism. All of these components have had both positive and negative influences on the U.S. economy. Creative destruction creates new jobs to replace the ones that were originally ended by NAFTA, globalization expands ideas, products, and business, but also causes the U.S. to lose money, job reconstruction recreates jobs to fit the functions of NAFTA and sometimes causes workers to lose their original jobs, and isolation

In fact, trade with Canada and Mexico supports 14 million American jobs and generates $1.3 trillion annually in goods and services traded across our borders. However, with the implementation of trade agreements such as the NAFTA, the world has become more interconnected, and citizens must be aware of the effects such trade agreements have on their living standards and job security.

Unlike the United States 7.25/hr minimum wage, Mexico’s minimum wage is set at just few dollars per day. Careless of the American working class, large corporations closed factories in the US and moved them south of the border to Mexico where they could pay workers a minimum wage and not have to conform to regulations. Since Mexico was added, the US manufacturing sector has outsourced five million jobs (Blecker). Many of these workers did not have a backup plan or funds to support them after they lost their job therefore they fell into extreme poverty. Sadly, these workers could not provide for their families and struggled to survive. Not only did NAFTA ruin the US manufacturing job market, the trade deficit between the USA and Mexico grew exponentially and now sits at an unfathomable amount. The deficit took a turn for the worse due to NAFTA, the United states had a 1.7 billion dollar surplus in 1993 (prior to Mexico’s addition), to a 54 billion dollar deficit by 2014 (Mcbride). Clearly, the United States lost a significant amount of currency due to NAFTA. Although the US is commonly on the losing side of trade deals, NAFTA is by far the most detrimental to the

Since 1993, total trade between the three signatory nations has gone from $290 billion to $1.1 trillion in 2016, with foreign direct investment (FDI) in Mexico increasing by over $90 billion (“NAFTA’s Impact on the U.S. Economy,” 2016). In addition, per capita American GDP growth is estimated to have been around $400 (“NAFTA’s Impact on the U.S. Economy”). Critics, however, still have plenty of material to work with. Though American jobs created by the deal pay on average 15-20% more than jobs lost, across the border in Mexico wages have stagnated with an increase of only 400,000 new jobs (“NAFTA’S Impact on the U.S. Economy”). It is also reasonable to argue that free trade has come at the price of necessary regulation. Since companies could move operations north or south more easily, many unions lost their bargaining power and some businesses began ignoring environmental regulations (Faux, 2013). Mexican small businesses also suffered, giving rise to the claim that NAFTA could have caused more illegal immigration (Faux). As far as FDI was concerned, the U.S. and Canada benefitted significantly more than Mexico (Feils & Rahman, 2008, p. 162). Job losses in labor intensive industries like auto manufacturing were felt the most as the low wage labor became available elsewhere (“NAFTA’s Impact on the U.S. Economy”). Inevitably, these various effects created groups of winners and losers that struggled to agree on NAFTA’s true

American manufacturing jobs were lost as U.S. firms used NAFTA’s new foreign investor privileges to relocate production to Mexico to take advantage of that country’s lower wages and weaker environmental standards. U.S. job erosion worsened as a new flood of NAFTA imports swamped gains in exports, creating a massive new trade deficit that equated to an estimated net loss of one million U.S. jobs by

This article outlines a difference of opinion between former Mexico President Vicente Fox, and the president of the United States Donald Trump. The difference of opinion is over Mr. Trump building a wall dividing Mexico and the U.S., where Fox gets frustrated at is how Trump wants Mexico to pay for the wall, and how speaks down on Mexico. Fox also hopes that the current president Nieto does not back down to Trump's order on the matter, and that he stands ground, telling Trump to “Go to hell”.

NAFTA has been a modest success to the extent it was designed to benefit its member nations. In general, the agreement has helped to boost environmental standards. It has improved conditions in Mexico and helped to lower prices in the US (Cherniwchan, 2017). It has also helped to create a special relationship between the US and Mexico, which could be valuable down the road. However, it has also created something of an offshoring and outsourcing crisis, which has crippled many different rural communities in the US. There are entire communities that depended on factories that have been moved out of town. This is difficult on these communities and surely will lead to long-term problems in the US (Cherniwchan, 2017).

In the article “NAFTA at 20: Overviews and Trade Effects” by Villarreal and Fergusson, we are given and account of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Specifically, the article is broken down into four main sections. They are: trade liberalization before the implementation of NAFTA, an overview of NAFTA provisions, trade trends and economic effects, and policy considerations respectively. In each of these sections, the article discusses in detail how what NAFTA is and how it has affected the US, Canadian, and Mexican economies. Therefore, let us briefly examine NAFTA.

The U.S. goods and services trade deficit with NAFTA was $116 billion in 2007.” The economic advantages of NAFTA are substantial, in 2015 the trade administration has stated that trade had increased to $1.15 trillion. With such a drastic increase this has shown how valuable NAFTA is to the U.S. and certainly Mexico. According to the Foreign Trade Analysis, many businesses within Mexico rely on the trade agreement in order to ship their goods and services to the U.S. and Canada without increased tariffs, for example, the Mexican local-content requirements.

NAFTA has been a hot topic of conversation over the last two decades. This agreement has many implications that not only affect Americans, but also the global market. In the United States, many people have been adversely affected by NAFTA. This is because they have lost jobs and some industries, such as the automobile industry, has gone to other countries because of cheaper costs. There are many advantages and disadvantages to this pact. Since NAFTA has harmed people in the United States, many people believe that we should get rid of it. On the other hand, others have pointed to the increasing global domestic product (GDP) in the United States, Mexico, and Canada as support to keep the agreement. The objective of this paper to weigh these pro’s and con’s and make a logical conclusion to what we should do about NAFTA in the future.