Essay on Negative Consequences of Gender Role Stereotyping

be accepted into their society (Hussain et al.). The authors also note that members of a society

Due to social conformity, along with the advancement of technology and surgical procedure intersexed persons are aimed to be "fixed" at birth.  Although otherwise healthy, there is a need to perform surgery on the baby in order to remove certain sexual organs that don't fit with the perfect idea of what a girl or boy should look like.  This often leaves scars, and the psychological and emotional confusion along with it.

First and foremost, a person’s genitalia does not and cannot define their gender, as gender is an expression and is unrelated to genitalia. One’s assigned sex at birth, based solely off of genitalia, is defined as that person’s ‘cisgender’(insert citation). This may be different from the gender one expresses themselves as. People who must represent themselves as their cisgender are enslaved into their body; they are stuck in place, being restrained by the crushing weight of a ball and chain of societal values, with no say as to what they truly believe they are. Each and every individual suffers, knowing they do not pertain to any kind of body that which they identify with. Ignorant parents and doctors find themselves misgendering their children at birth, and as an unfortunate consequence, for the rest of their lives. The child never is able to express their opinion as what they themselves may identify as. One possible example of a parent showing at least a shred of respect for their newborn could be showing their baby the color spectrum and allow them to pick their favorite color that represents a gender. That is one of the ideal

Gender, rather than being a binary distinction between male and female, is a spectrum-- and so is sex. Intersex and gender non binary people have existed throughout human history, from the Indian hijra to the Indonesian calabai and calalai. Binary sex and gender are social constructs: they are created, idealized, and enforced by society through harassment, estrangement, and mutilation of those whose experiences do not fit the “norm”. By operating on healthy genitals to force them to fit a specific and exclusive definition of sex, doctors and parents who consent to infant intersex surgery are enforcing the social construct and allowing for discrimination. Let’s bring it back to birth certificates. With only two choices, male and female, there is little option NOT to assign

International, national and provincial policy needs revision as the legal rights still vary from different countries and states when it comes to gender identification and poses a significant threat to discriminate against intersex individuals. This lack of support from society strengthens the urgency of medical assignment and surgical interventions to intersex children. However, the psychological ramifications of surgical interventions cannot be ignored. While scholars, ethicists and scientist continue to provide insights and work on the ideal approach, surgical interventions are still being practiced today; heavily influenced by socio-cultural views of gender binarism. In an ethical standpoint, nurture over nature raises the question of who gets to decide what normal genitals should look like? Having the “correct” genitals, chromosomes and hormones shouldn’t be the only way to guarantee a legal spot in a

Genitals that were ambiguous were just thought of as a natural variation of human anatomy [2]. Due to a huge leap in medicine in the 20th century, the medical field started to view intersexual conditions as abnormal and curable through surgery and other options. Starting in the 50s, doctors have used the “concealment-centered model” of healthcare when intersexuality is encountered. Using this model’s derivation, the “optimum of gender rearing model”, doctors “correct” the ambiguous genitals by means of surgery and hormonal treatments. Under this model, gender assignment should be done as early as possible so that children would “grow up to be good (believable and straight) girls and boys” [1]. This method of healthcare tries to “normalize” intersex individuals because it is trying to prevent the individuals from being “ostracized” in society

Gender: a word society uses far too often without realizing its true complicated meaning. Children are born every day and the golden question becomes “Is it a boy or a girl?” What would a person do if they heard their child was neither or both? According to the National Institutes of Health, “One out of every 2,000 kids is born with genitals that cannot be clearly identified as male or female.” These types of children are called “Intersex”, and they break the boundary of gender identification. Intersex is a broad category for many situations where an individual’s genital or reproductive anatomy, or chromosomal pattern, lies between the normal standards of both male and female. The prefix “inter” stands for between; therefore, the simple definition of intersex is “between the sexes.” Intersex conditions usually result from a genetic

The society we live in today has expectations for everyone from birth till death. These expectations can make us become a person we never thought we would be, or a person we are glad that we became. You can call these many expectations your gender role which is a set of societal norms dictating what types of behaviors are generally considered acceptable or appropriate for a person based on your actual or perceived sex. Everyone living in society today has them to fill. Gender roles do not always have a positive impact on a person. When you are growing up your parents always told you to be who you wanted to be and to chase your dreams. The requirements your suppose to fill while perceived as a male or a female make

The choice to perform surgeries on intersex bodies are not only violent but continue to institutionalize gender roles and norms. 1 in 1,500 children are born with atypical genitalia (“How Common Is Intersex”) and about 10,829 children are born each day, causing 7 intersex babies to be born daily (“How Many Babies are Born Each Day”). As doctors continuously choose to implement surgical procedures to “correct” intersex infant’s genitalia, doctors are also choosing to further marginalize the intersex population. Many children who undergo gender corrective surgeries are never told about the procedures, with the idea that it will help the children more easily conform to their newly assigned gender. However, by decreasing the population of intersex

Have you even classified or label the other only by their age, religion, age, race, and gender? And, you will think who they are. They would have a thought about the others are good or bad, educated or uneducated, and rich or poor. Although some of the stereotypes are innocuous, but some of it are offensive. Those offensive stereotypes would make stereotypees get some bad impression by the other. They would always stereotype the others based on their religion and gender, but those stereotypes would impact people’s lives negatively.

The subject of intersex individuals is a mystery to many, as it was to me before my research began. I found it interesting to discover that many babies born with ambiguous genitalia, such as a very small penis or a larger than normal clitoris were often surgically altered to make their genitalia appear more ‘normal’, regardless of their internal body structures. In addition, I found that many of these infants’ bodies were able to function without pain or discomfort and yet intervention surgery was still

The theme of this paper is gendered stereotypes in the media.This paper will investigate the question, “To what extent are females stereotyped more than men in the media in the U.S.?” while looking specifically at examples from movies, music, and advertisements. To begin, an overview of history was given to provide insight on the progression of gender roles and the expanding media. Viewpoints on both male and female stereotypes in the media were investigated and analyzed to determine if females are, in fact, stereotyped more. The sources used in this investigation were evaluated to determine their credibility and what support, if any, they offered to the argument. After analyzing the information and sources, it was concluded that women are stereotyped more than men in the media based on the societal norms developed throughout history.

Previous to the 19th century, most intersexual individuals led ordinary lives. Their genital difference was mostly accepted as part of the difference which occurs in nature. Intersex was never a health problem (Daaboul, 2000). It was in the 19th century where intersex became a medicalized and individuals born intersex were categorized as “abnormal” and “diseased” (Daaboul, 2000). The drive of medicine in the last century has been to “cure” intersexed individuals by using surgical, hormonal and psychological therapies to make them clearly female or male. However, the practical and psychological outcomes of this approach have been poor. Many intersexed individuals have suffered severe mental and bodily damage from medicine’s efforts to make them

For decades, researchers have been studying how children develop gender-stereotyped behaviour, such as preferences for pink or blue. Some have suggested, for example, that since gender-stereotyped colour dressing is so common in infancy, infants develop a preference for these familiar colours as they grow older (Chiu et al., 2006; Cohen,