Negative Effects Of Animal Testing On The Economy

Animal testing is a common practice in current life that is necessary to ensure the safety of the humans that will be using the tested product. There are many good and bad aspects of animal testing, but the pros clearly outweigh the cons. Animal testing has been around since ancient times when animals were dissected to gain knowledge about the body and organs. The animals killed from animal testing make up a tiny percentage of the total animals killed every year. When just considering the animals used for food compared to the animals used for testing, testing animals make up a mere 2.6 percent of that number. Public safety far outweighs the lives of the small amount of animals killed.

The issue of animal testing being bad is because of how inhumane testing labs can treat animals as subjects. The issue is controversial because while some believe that it helps benefit humans, others believe that there are other alternatives for helping humans.

Millions of animals suffer due to effects of testing they must endure. This testing is usually done unethically and causes major harm. It’s wrong to harm animals for the sake of testing products for society. Furthermore, animals are living creatures just like humans and should not be treated differently. While testing animals may be cheaper, it is morally wrong and causes many harmful side effects in animals.

At this moment, tens of millions of animals, such as rats, rabbits, monkeys, cats, and dogs, plus more, are being locked inside cages in labs all throughout the country due to being used in horrific experiments. These animal experiments are used to develop and enhance new drugs and to test the safety of products before being used on humans. Many of these experiments inflict pain to the animals and decrease their satisfactory of life. More than a hundred million animals suffer and die every year in the U.S. from medical education and clinical experiments, as well as merciless chemical, drug, food, and cosmetic tests. Animals also suffer and die in classroom biology experiments and dissection.

There are some good things about animal testing but also bad things. The bad things of animal testing is that it can either kill animals or cause them long lasting harm. If the animal gets hurt during animal testing then it could heal but sometimes that’s not the case and some animals will suffer from permanent damage. That permanent damage might even be painful. The tests done on the animal may be painful as well. Some of the drugs and products that pass animal testing aren’t necessarily safe. Animals are also very different from people. The animal testing can also mislead researchers to ignoring potential cures and treatments for diseases and illnesses.

Animal testing is a huge problem. The methods used to test on them are dangerous and cruel. To measure the toxic effects, animals are forced to swallow or inhale massive quantities of a test substance or have the chemical smeared in their eyes and on their skin. This makes the animals endure severe abdominal pain, convulsions, seizures, paralysis and extreme internal and external bleeding. These horrific things happen to the animals before they are killed and eventually die from all the chemicals and toxins put on and in them. That is why animal testing is a big problem.

There are many good and bad things about animal testing. Everyone has a different opinion on animal testing. But not enough to fully tip the scale to the side that everyone likes. Some bad things about animal testing are that testing can harm the animals, substances may never be used, and testing is unnecessary.

First and foremost, animal testing is harmful to the animals. In statistics from the USDA, they state that over 100 million animals are killed in the U.S. annually from animal testing (USDA). George Dvorsky said, “it was a call to reduce the severity of distress, pain, and fear experienced by many lab animals.” (Dvorsky).

The second reason why animal testing is bad is animal testing brings down the economy. For example the government spends millions of dollars on taking care of these animals and most of the time the animals die or escape or die trying to escape and, that’s just stupid to spend millions of dollars on caring for animals that have a higher percentage of dying than living (Murnaghan). And most of the drugs that are tested will never be approved or will be approved and won’t work and kill some

I think that animal testing is a cruel and inhuman thing to do especially if you are hurting the animal on purpose. Even though animals don't have rights you should still not abuse them by burning them, pulling their eyes out, or just beating them. Did you know that over hundred million animals are abused in U.S. labs every year? Imagine if you were in the animals place how would you feel, would you try to do something about it?

Imagine you're a scientist. You get a rat. You stuff drugs in it. The rat slowly dies. Animal testing is a problem and should be banned because it harms animals, the results are unreliable, and other countries banned it.

Animal testing is good because; no humans have to die for something that may not

Animal testing is where humans test medicines and makeup on animals. The good side too it is a lot of life saving medical discoveries. The bad side is a lot of the animals are mistreated.

Do you think Animal Testing is good or bad? If you said bad you're correct. According to Dictonary.com animal testing means ¨The use of non-human animals in research and development projects, esp. for purposes of determining the safety of substances such as foods or drugs.¨ Each year, more than 100 million animals die from animal testing. According to the article by Noah Berlatsky, “Most animal experiments are not relevant to human health, they do not even contribute meaningfully to medical advances and many are undertaken simply out of curiosity and do not even pretend to hold promise for curing illnesses.” The article also states, “The only U.S. law that governs the use of animals in laboratories-the Animal Welfare Act-allows animals to be burned, shocked, poisoned, isolated, starved, forcibly

I believe animal testing is bad, because as time goes by we have come up with and developed many different alternatives to animal testing. These new technologies are far superior to animal testing and are more accurate in the sense that they produce results that mirror human testing. This is because the technology mimics muscular functions and thus can produce lab results that would come up in human trials without the risk of harming humans or animals. Because of this, we can be certain how a drug or treatment will react in a person and whether it will give the intended results. I also strongly believe we should not test on animals simply because they don’t have the capacity to understand what is being done to them and they can’t resist. In human trails, it’s illegal to test on someone without having written consent and that they know what is being done to them so we should under this premise not allow animal testing to continue. A rational person would know that it would be unfair, illogical and downright cruel to continue testing on animals. Animals should share the same right as people do to live in a world without having to suffer or go through these