Negative Factors Of The Internet On Health And Health

Caveat lector is a Latin phrase meaning, “let the reader beware.” Health information on the internet is growing at an alarming rate. However, some information on the internet is not accurate or current, and unfortunately, many web sites regarding healthcare offer misleading, incomplete, and incorrect information. Many consumers do not have the knowledge to judge and evaluate the quality of online information. This paper aims to discuss how the website WebMD presents information to readers. It will evaluate WebMD according to its source, where was the source obtained; type of funding, is it commercially funded or private; the validity and quality, how valid is the information and can it be verified; and privacy, is your personal information

Education of patients and families regarding the reliability of internet information is prudent. Given the enormous amount of information available via the World Wide Web, not all of which, as you illustrate, is reliable, it is of great importance that patients and families comprehend the unreliability of some of the information they may acquire. Patients who are unable to gain access to health care secondary to a lack of funds, insurance, or availability of their provider, may be inclined to review their symptoms utilizing a search engine. Moreover, patients who were incapable of accessing healthcare due to reasons other than a lack of insurance are more likely to utilize the internet to obtain health related

However, take notice that the information you find from whatever website should never replace your doctor’s advice. Don’t go telling your doctor that the internet says you should get an injection and not some damn bitter tablets. Remember that diseases manifest themselves differently in different people and because the internet has not examined you, it should not your diagnosis. In essence your doctor’s advice should hold the final say. Similarly, do not self-diagnose based on internet symptom description and most importantly, do not start control routines you saw on a consumer health information website without the knowledge and a go ahead from your

With the advancement of technology it is becoming increasingly easy to diagnose illnesses via the internet. According to one article written by college student Hilly Nguyen under UWIRE Text the act of self-diagnosing could potentially be harmful. While plugging in a persons sympomtons on an online symptom checker could save both time and money there are many reasons to go see a professional instead. Firstly, there are no guarentees that online resources are accurate. While some websites may be more reliable than others, many people have the capablility to post an article spreading false information about diseases. Seconly, many illnesses have common symptoms. This would mean that there is a possibility of assuming a person is experiencing a

Health and medicine are important for a society to run smoothly. The internet can be very dangerous. First of all, one does not know who is putting this information on the internet and many illnesses have similar symptoms but need different treatments. It is not always easy to decide what is reliable. 80% of internet users go online to find health related information. Many people rely and trust the internet which makes them sicker. When one is unhealthy, it leads to them not being able to perform their role in society and become exempt from normal obligations. Doctors play a vital role in keeping people healthy and productive in our society. People tend to believe what they read on the internet. But as we have learned

This is a cause for concern since many users are developing traits toward a condition coined as "cyberchondriasis". Cyberchondriasis is a type of hypochondriasis that develops when a person, who is on the internet, identifies with the symptom that lead to one or more conditions. The individual then convinces him or herself that he or she is suffering from those conditions without an accurate medical diagnosis from a trained medical professional. The majority of people are receiving misleading information regarding their health from the content they read online. By not seeking out a mental or medical health professional, the online "guidance" may only intensify the problem over

In a technologically advanced society we are constantly bombarded with information. In recent years, the emergence of medical and self helpself-help sites have evolved to answer the medical needs of patients in the twenty-first21st century. The abundance of information on these sites can lead them to be inaccurate or unhelpful.; Hhowever, the sites continue to hold a strong following, pushing forward into a billion dollar industry year after year . When looking at the results it yields, some might wonder how something as questionableskeptical as an online symptom checker can yield such a following. However, byBy examining what information people are searching and how they are applying the found results, we are able to grasp a better idea on the appeal of online health care sites. Perhaps the answer lies not in the direct results produced by the online sites, but in the need the sites fulfill for their its new age users.

The second advantage is Patient Care. The demonstration of the use of web-based system administrations and smartphones for direct patient care is progressively being recognized by clinicians and health care facilities. Recent studies have found that doctors have started to build up an eagerness for connecting with patients on the web. A few doctors are utilizing online networking, including Twitter and Facebook, to improve correspondence with patients. Roughly 60% of doctors found to support connecting with patients through web-based social networking for motivation behind giving patient instruction and well-being checking, and for empowering behavioral changes and medication adherence, with the expectation that these attempts will prompt to

Internet communication was not common in 2004. However, there were still many people wanted to use the Internet to speak with their health providers and physician. Physician-patient communication is vital to patient satisfaction, treatment adherence, and health outcomes (Thomas et al 601). The authors believed that the use of the internet could improve the physician-patient communication (601). In order to prove their hypothesis, they utilized a cross-sectional study. At the beginning, they conducted an Internet-based survey of patients who used the Internet to look for health information. Then, they made telephone interviews among those who filled in the survey and had used email to communicate with their physicians.

In today’s society people rely on the Internet through computers, smart phones, and pads for information needs. The Internet provides an abundance of information from fashion trends to medical information. Unfortunately not everything on the Internet is true which is dangerous in the medical community, especially for patients with chronic illnesses. Many people self-diagnose or treat themselves using information from the Internet. One way to help ensure that patients are getting the correct information and also being compliant with treatment is through telehealth. According to Hebda & Czar (2013), telehealth is the use of telecommunication technologies and electronic information to exchange healthcare information and to offer and support

Computer networking enables quicker communication. Computers and the Internet have proven to be a boon in all the spheres of life. In the field of medicine, computers allow faster communication between a patient and a doctor. Doctors can collaborate better over the Internet. Today, it is possible to obtain experts' opinions within seconds by means of the Internet. Medical professionals sitting on opposite sides of the globe can communicate within minutes with the help of the Internet. It is due to computer networking technology that network communication has become easy. Medical practitioners can discuss medical issues in medical forums, they can blog, write articles, contribute to medical journals available online. Updates in the medical field, advancements in medicine, information about new methods of treatment, etc. can reach the common man within minutes, thanks to the Internet and easy access to computers. Doctors can exchange images and messages in seconds and derive conclusions speedily. They can seek advice and share knowledge in a convenient manner over the Internet.

The following paper discusses how everyday use of the Internet to seek information regarding health issues is empowering people and changing the doctor–patient dynamic, as patients become autonomous decision makers. In order to understand this, the paper details the history of asserting an active role in one’s health. The focus then turns to three main concepts: how the effect of using the Internet to pursue health information is refocusing patients as passive receivers of information to active consumers of information; the benefits of being an Internet informed doctor when consulting with empowered patients; and the inevitable change in dynamics between doctor and patient. The context and limitation of the discussion is that of people who use the Internet to gain health information and attend face-to-face doctor consultations.

Using the internet as a tool to solve unanswered questions is pretty quick and straight to the point. When a person is searching a topic, he may come to an article and begin to skim it; he follows a hyperlink. This hyperlink gives assistance in finding other information on the topic. After clicking on it, the person finds a whole new article. “Russ warner says, Many websites put links with intriguing titles next to every article. There are some sites that have links on all sides of the article, so that no matter which way you look, there’s an article enticing you to click just once more.” This process just sends one on a journey and most times a person does not find what they were originally searching for. There are many different views and opinions on whether or not internet has a positive or negative effect on a person’s life. The internet inhibits one’s ability to retain newly explored information; it constantly distracted and interrupted which causes a short attention span; and the Internet causes “addicts brain”.

basic internet connection can easily research and share scientific discoveries and advice. Self help services, support groups, and online groups all contribute to instant access to health information.

While there is nothing wrong with going to the doctor’s office prepared with an arsenal of documents printed out from a search result on google.com, using google.com in place of a doctor is a strict no-no. The 35% of online diagnosers that did not visit a clinic to get a medical professional’s help are putting themselves in grave danger.