preview

Neighbor Rosicky And The Tomorrow-Tamer

Decent Essays

In this essay, I will compare and contrast the endings of “Neighbor Rosicky” by Willa Cather and “The Tomorrow-Tamer” by Margaret Laurence. In both stories, the protagonists figuratively live on after their deaths through reflection from other characters and setting, and have their respective life purposes fulfilled, making their deaths seem beautiful rather than tragic. “Neighbor Rosicky” ends with Doctor Ed visiting the graveyard that Rosicky is buried in. He denounces the cemeteries in the cities that Rosicky has spent half of his life living in, and decides that the country graveyard is perfect for Rosicky, “a man who … had always longed for the open country and had got to it at last” (Cather, 40). The contrast between country and city emphasizes the importance of the country to Rosicky in both life and death. Rosicky is not merely “dead, forgotten or put away,” like Doctor Ed claims those buried in city cemeteries …show more content…

The “metallic humming of the cables” make it seem “almost alive,” and it becomes “part of Owuraso at last” (Laurence, 106), implying that Kofi sacrificed and transferred his life to the bridge so that it could finally be accepted by the town. Like Rosicky, Kofi is remembered by other characters after his death, who praise him and claim that “a man consumed by the gods lives forever.” Through the stories that are told of him, Kofi does indeed “live forever,” much like Rosicky. However, while Kofi is mythologized by the entire village, with “many tales woven around his name,” Rosicky is remembered by his family and close friends. The contrast between the communal and the personal reflects the goals of each character in their lives. While Kofi wishes for the bridge in Owurasu to be completed, Rosicky longs for his and his family’s own happiness and freedom in the country. Both characters ultimately have these dreams realized in

Get Access